Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whoa, And... Oopsie... 'The Danger of NSA Spying on Members of Congress' - TheAtlantic [View all]malaise
(296,283 posts)15. From Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Harman#Warrantless_wiretapping
<snip>
Harman defended the Bush administration's use of international (cross-border) warrantless wiretapping through the National Security Agency, saying: "I believe the program is essential to U.S. national security and that its disclosure has damaged critical intelligence capabilities".[22] Harman suggested that both the original "despicable"[23] whistleblowers and the New York Times, which broke the story, should be investigated, and in the case of The Times, "limits on press immunity" should be looked into.[24] Harman repeatedly pressured the Times not to publish the warrantless wiretap story. In late 2004, Harman called Phillip Taubman, the Washington bureau chief of the Times, to discourage him from running the story. In December 2005, Harman was among a group of lawmakers who visited Taubman in an attempt to convince him not to run the story.[25] Following reports in April 2009 of her conversations being recorded without her knowledge, she appeared to take a different stance regarding wholly domestic wiretaps. In an interview with Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC:
That's what I've asked Attorney General Holder to doto release any tapes, I don't know whether they were legally made or not, of my conservations about this matter... and to hope that he will investigate whether other members of Congress or other innocent Americans might have been subject to this same kind of treatment. I call it an abuse of power in the letter I wrote him this morning...I'm just very disappointed that my countryI'm an American citizen just like you arecould have permitted what I think is a gross abuse of power in recent years. I'm one member of Congress who may be caught up in it, but I have a bully pulpit and I can fight back. I'm thinking about others who have no bully pulpit, and may not be aware, as I was not, that right now, somewhere, someone is listening in on their conversations, and they're innocent Americans.
Jane Harman, [26]
More than a few DUers were 100% right about her
<snip>
Harman defended the Bush administration's use of international (cross-border) warrantless wiretapping through the National Security Agency, saying: "I believe the program is essential to U.S. national security and that its disclosure has damaged critical intelligence capabilities".[22] Harman suggested that both the original "despicable"[23] whistleblowers and the New York Times, which broke the story, should be investigated, and in the case of The Times, "limits on press immunity" should be looked into.[24] Harman repeatedly pressured the Times not to publish the warrantless wiretap story. In late 2004, Harman called Phillip Taubman, the Washington bureau chief of the Times, to discourage him from running the story. In December 2005, Harman was among a group of lawmakers who visited Taubman in an attempt to convince him not to run the story.[25] Following reports in April 2009 of her conversations being recorded without her knowledge, she appeared to take a different stance regarding wholly domestic wiretaps. In an interview with Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC:
That's what I've asked Attorney General Holder to doto release any tapes, I don't know whether they were legally made or not, of my conservations about this matter... and to hope that he will investigate whether other members of Congress or other innocent Americans might have been subject to this same kind of treatment. I call it an abuse of power in the letter I wrote him this morning...I'm just very disappointed that my countryI'm an American citizen just like you arecould have permitted what I think is a gross abuse of power in recent years. I'm one member of Congress who may be caught up in it, but I have a bully pulpit and I can fight back. I'm thinking about others who have no bully pulpit, and may not be aware, as I was not, that right now, somewhere, someone is listening in on their conversations, and they're innocent Americans.
Jane Harman, [26]
More than a few DUers were 100% right about her
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Whoa, And... Oopsie... 'The Danger of NSA Spying on Members of Congress' - TheAtlantic [View all]
WillyT
Jan 2014
OP
He is the President and the State Department is part of the Executive Branch
neverforget
Jan 2014
#18
It's way to early for me to get worked up about the 2016 primaries. Hillary is not
neverforget
Jan 2014
#24
Every politician, every judge, every cop, every prosecutor. What could possibly go wrong.
Scuba
Jan 2014
#22
It's remarkably dishonest reporting from a conservative writer at the now-conservative Atlantic
struggle4progress
Jan 2014
#25
And Sometimes... The Left And Right Find An Issue They Can Agree On... This Is One Of Those Times.
WillyT
Jan 2014
#26
Friedersdorf's resurrecting a five year old story alleging unethical behavior by Harmon
struggle4progress
Jan 2014
#30
Yet another April 2009 story based on Stein's CQ report can't provide additional evidence to us:
struggle4progress
Jan 2014
#32
I spent much of the Bush era pissed at Harmon -- but that's a separate issue.
struggle4progress
Jan 2014
#37