General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Searching For The Science Behind Reincarnation [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I s'pose. In my mind the fact that the kids are talking of mostly nobody in importance in historical records, and not the usual suspects...the research has been done carefully as well.
It was started over fifty years ago after the first researcher came across spontaneous statements from kids and decided to follow through. He dared ask, what if? And until QM he had no good explanation that "fit" just a strange problem.
My problem with this is that while it might offer an explanation, it also provides plenty of fodder for religious people who will grasp at this as proof. Science on the edges is at times now quite weird, but that is what makes it fascinating. In my mind we problably are at the edge of another scientific revolution.
But my other problem is people who pretty much treat science like another religion, and the scientific method as god given and unchanging. And the best part is they don't realize that. The method itself has evolved and it is very different today than it was in the 16th century when it started to take form. This research, is bleeding edge, and some of it can't be proven. Some of it might be bedieveled by researcher bias. Some it might be a matter of scientific equipment. But when it comes to this, that famous cat in a box comes to mind.
It is still quite fascinating.
If you want real weird, not directly related to this, read into to the holographic universe and consciousness. Now that is just plain out weird.