General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Will men ever start seeing woman as people first, sex objects last? [View all]Shandris
(3,447 posts)I think some amount of superficiality is healthy, good, expected, and intended. I would find someone who is -completely- unsuperficial to be very creepy and, well, downright anti-social. I would also point out I never spoke of doing it to look for mates, only to fit into societal interplay/norms/expectations. I will most certainly get glammed up at -my- wedding without looking for a mate; everyone else will be too, so I'd like to fit in somewhat!
That's why I was a bit curious about the nature of the question -- it seems (to me) like such an obvious thing, but I suppose there probably is a fine line between what I call 'little superficiality' and others call 'no superficiality'. To me, Ted Kaczynski would be someone with 'no superficiality', and I'm quite certain none of us want to emulate him.