General Discussion

surfdog

(624 posts)

31. At least you admit...

Reply to sabrina 1 (Reply #14)

Fri Mar 16, 2012, 08:51 AM

Mar 2012

That the police have the authority to kill somebody without due process

Thanks for making my point

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice denied: Obama must defend killing citizens without a trial [View all] The Northerner Mar 2012 OP

Treason doth not prosper gratuitous Mar 2012 #1

They've made "due process" equal to "the President ordered him shot." kenny blankenship Mar 2012 #28

Yep, but you can't really say that gratuitous Mar 2012 #30

Do the police have the authority.... surfdog Mar 2012 #2

Because those killed were not in the United States. RC Mar 2012 #5

So if you can get across the border, it is all good, right? quaker bill Mar 2012 #17

Police officers are held accountable, or are supposed to be, when someone is killed. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #14

Indeed they are quaker bill Mar 2012 #18

At least you admit... surfdog Mar 2012 #31

You Have 2 Anti Obama Posts on Same Afternoon ..Is this a Trend with You? indykatie1955 Mar 2012 #3

"Anti-Obama" ? bvar22 Mar 2012 #7

The constitution does not rule out the use of lethal force quaker bill Mar 2012 #19

And yet, there has to be some evidence that the citizens were a threat worthy of the death sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #21

Deadly force is legal against fleeing felons here quaker bill Mar 2012 #26

And here comes the Al Qaeda defendant surfdog Mar 2012 #32

And here comes the Al Qaeda defendant surfdog Mar 2012 #34

Did you just call me an 'Al Queda Defendant'? sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #35

Simply put.... surfdog Mar 2012 #36

Post it please. You made the allegation, it is up to you to post some proof of your claim. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #38

Here you go... surfdog Mar 2012 #40

Just as I thought. You made a vile false allegation and can not back it up. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #43

McCarthyism is alive and well it seems. white_wolf Mar 2012 #44

This particular McBreitbartiate is dead now: Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #49

First off, that word doesn't mean what you think it means. Second, way to channel Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #46

Are you now or have you ever been...? girl gone mad Mar 2012 #9

Welcome to the new DU! nt woo me with science Mar 2012 #10

It's like the evil-doers must be wasted at any cost, hang the collateral indepat Mar 2012 #4

I'm suprised by the number of DUers willing to help him out with this defense. hughee99 Mar 2012 #6

hehehe SammyWinstonJack Mar 2012 #8

It's shameful _ed_ Mar 2012 #12

Ding, ding! saras Mar 2012 #25

No shit ed. rudycantfail Mar 2012 #29

Every time I read this story, I wonder if Holder also means a metaphorical killing. Trillo Mar 2012 #11

k & freakin r! nt wildbilln864 Mar 2012 #13

Am I ProSense Mar 2012 #15

So a question. USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #16

Good question. Swede Mar 2012 #20

There would have to be some evidence that this was the case, otherwise anyone could sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #22

Appears ProSense Mar 2012 #23

I'm speaking in general about the 'Rule of Law'. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #37

I see. USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #24

Who's going to make him? kenny blankenship Mar 2012 #27

Did FDR have to defend the policy during WWII? Thx in advance uponit7771 Mar 2012 #33

I don't know the answer to that. Can you post some examples of where FDR sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #39

Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #42

Prove it! You've already failed to do so so far. I'm sure everyone is now waiting for you sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #45

Calm down Slappy. You don't wanna have a heart attack at 43. Or maybe you do. Who knows. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #47

Internment camps were ok JoePhilly Mar 2012 #41

No they weren't, and they are and will remain a stain on FDR's sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #48

Maybe I needed the sarcasm tag?? Guess so. JoePhilly Mar 2012 #50