Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Mild Paedophilia Never Did Me Any Harm': Atheist Scientist Richard Dawkins Declares [View all]applegrove
(132,004 posts)158. That's it. I'm done with him.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
160 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Mild Paedophilia Never Did Me Any Harm': Atheist Scientist Richard Dawkins Declares [View all]
onehandle
Jan 2014
OP
The FUCK he did: "I don't think he did any of US (caps mine) any lasting damage."
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2014
#99
I'm not bashing him as a victim, I'm bashing him as someone who says pedophilia
Common Sense Party
Jan 2014
#114
I agree, this is creepy. But enjoy his books before I knew this. Smart man. Weird though. n-t
Logical
Jan 2014
#3
You mean like 'minimize the effects of molestation on children' as Dawkins just did?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#79
'other boys had been molested' 'I don't think he did any of us any lasting damage.'
onehandle
Jan 2014
#21
I've been trashing the anti-religion threads, and this one will get trashed as well.
liberal_at_heart
Jan 2014
#26
I know what it's like to be forcibly raped as a child and I find what Professor Dawkins said to be
Arcanetrance
Jan 2014
#75
There's another "great thinker" who says that we should "look forwards and not backwards"
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#38
"Copping a feel. Fondling. Inappropriate touching." Another word for it? MOLESTATION.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2014
#101
Would the outcry here be different if it was someone besides Dawkins? Someone you admire?
Hamlette
Jan 2014
#51
I know you were harmed because you admitted you didn't want to be known as the boy who was molested.
newcriminal
Jan 2014
#76
he does not imply others should no complain, and there is no way you can know it did lasting damage.
Hamlette
Jan 2014
#72
Go ahead and explain to me the "Degrees of MOLESTATION". Explain it like I'm a child. n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2014
#102
Ok, for the sake of discussion, let's define a scale from 1 to 10. 1 is just 'creepily' looking at,
Electric Monk
Jan 2014
#131
Exactly. It is childish to look at life as if there are only 2 choices on everything
BlueStreak
Jan 2014
#150
Am I understanding this? Dawkins was a molested as a child and calls it no big deal?
Orrex
Jan 2014
#97
No, you don't have it right. Thanks for playing though. Don't forget your door prize.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2014
#103
I am glad to hear that. I just want it to be known I don't do the religion thing or post veiled
ScreamingMeemie
Jan 2014
#112
Richard Dawkins has been demonstrating he's a complete asshole for quite some time
CrawlingChaos
Jan 2014
#123
Please log off the internet and don't post again, if that's what you got from this. nt
Electric Monk
Jan 2014
#132
The subject is so emotional for people that many don't even know what he said.
ZombieHorde
Jan 2014
#136
This sort of attitude is not uncommon in older men who went to English 'public' schools
LeftishBrit
Jan 2014
#137