Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
46. Well, ONE Democrat proved that standing up to those threats was the right thing to do. And frankly
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:35 PM
Jan 2014

if you are correct, how depressing that our party is so vulnerable to threats when the other party doesn't appear to worry about them.

I'm not seeing how 'they were afraid not to' helps the image Democrats. On the contrary. I know there was the claim that Dems were fearful of retaliation. if anything, THAT ALONE should have generated so much ANGER at Cristie that Dems should have united to EXPOSE him. I mean I expected dirty tricks from Cristie too. So what? Are we as a part so weak that rather than STAND UP against this kind of bullying, we cave and endorse the very people even Politicians are afraid of?

Sorry, but that is no excuse for the overwhelming number of heartfelt endorsements Cristie received from Democrats. I was shameful frankly and many of us said so at the time.

But ONE Democrat refused to be intimidates, and because of his refusal to be intimidated, the whole phony bi-partisan BS has been exposed. Demonstrating that standing UP to bullies is the RIGHT thing to do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

started a war where Dems would not approve any judicial nominees bettyellen Jan 2014 #1
and Christie blew up and wouldn't renominate a Repug judge, Helen E.Hoens, which was unprecedented…. bettyellen Jan 2014 #2
this was 8/12, and he is livid at senate democrats……. next day Ft Lee gets it… which is represented bettyellen Jan 2014 #4
Christie presser Aug 12, email Aug 13 WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2014 #7
There you go: Weinberg. Ilsa Jan 2014 #13
thanks, I found it hard to get all the names and dates and listen… did you hear Weinberg... bettyellen Jan 2014 #16
Good point indeed! The fact that wildstein answered "Got it" means he already knew the proceedures calimary Jan 2014 #50
That Is Exactly What I Thought When I Saw The "Got It" Response DallasNE Jan 2014 #53
That's an awesome analysis nilesobek Jan 2014 #74
He called Senate Democrats 'Animals'. Hopefully all those who endorsed him have finally learned sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #37
I don't think they endorsed out of bipartisanship. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #41
Well, ONE Democrat proved that standing up to those threats was the right thing to do. And frankly sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #46
Oh fuck she's on it bigdarryl Jan 2014 #3
Amazing stuff malaise Jan 2014 #5
OMG!!! Dr. Maddow got to the bottom of this! Ilsa Jan 2014 #6
Loretta Weinberg BIO link below Tx4obama Jan 2014 #12
Thanks! And we need to keep this thread by bettyellen kicked to high heaven. Ilsa Jan 2014 #14
By Jove, I think she's got it! GreatCaesarsGhost Jan 2014 #8
I thinkg that she is on to something. nt avebury Jan 2014 #9
Wow, I think she has nailed the reason for the retaliatory closure! Spazito Jan 2014 #10
plus there were many Dem pols who also did not endorse... stg81 Jan 2014 #25
Exactly, others who didn't endorse were not targets... Spazito Jan 2014 #29
SOMEBODY NEEDS TO ALERT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ilsa Jan 2014 #11
isn't it the attorney general for NJ being confirmed next week? Brigit's boss is supposed to bettyellen Jan 2014 #70
Senator Weinberg pointed out that the emails about "traffic" were so brief and cryptic that they bettyellen Jan 2014 #15
Early today, she commented on Christie's claims ProSense Jan 2014 #32
NJ Dems are smart. Who would be satisfied with his 2 hour bully-pity party? Cha Jan 2014 #42
New Jersey's 37th Legislative District and State Senator Loretta Weinberg Tx4obama Jan 2014 #17
Tks Tx! bettyellen Jan 2014 #18
Now: Ft Lee Mayor Soccolich…. "Glad that he came…" bettyellen Jan 2014 #19
did he have any guess the traffic situation was hinky? "provided no notice…. rumor mill started and bettyellen Jan 2014 #20
says Ft Lee is in the middle of a multi million dollar redevelopment right at the bridges foot, bettyellen Jan 2014 #24
Well, what does that mean Biggs, 'hinky'? WinkyDink Jan 2014 #48
K & R bench scientist Jan 2014 #21
The e-mails mention the Mayor ChangeUp106 Jan 2014 #22
It looks like that area is an annoyingly blue holdout so maybe it was cumulative ... bettyellen Jan 2014 #28
Fort Lee was red ChangeUp106 Jan 2014 #34
See Comment #17. State Senator representing Fort Lee is a Democrat. n/t Tx4obama Jan 2014 #39
nope, more Dem voters. they went for Corzine, but Christie did much better their his 2nd try bettyellen Jan 2014 #47
I believe the Mayor is mentioned in relation to his request for info AFTER the traffic jam... Spazito Jan 2014 #40
See the 'two links' in the thread link below Tx4obama Jan 2014 #23
Rachel is doing a great job Gothmog Jan 2014 #26
The domino effect starting ffr Jan 2014 #62
Kicked. n/t louslobbs Jan 2014 #27
Chris Christie urges reporters to 'take the bat' to 76-year-old widow (Weinberg) Tx4obama Jan 2014 #30
WHOA. There it is! bettyellen Jan 2014 #31
+1 Segami Jan 2014 #38
Oh My God renate Jan 2014 #56
K&R. I don't understand NJ politics, but CC is a jerk. I haven't forgotten Tampa when he talked freshwest Jan 2014 #33
Calling him a jerk is too kind. He's a stew of scum vomit and slime snot. He's a low bastard. nt valerief Jan 2014 #45
He's just like Walker, LePage, Perry and the rest. A bunch of il duci. CC is a Koch kingdom duke. freshwest Jan 2014 #59
Rachel Maddow: An alternate theory of the Christie scandal - VIDEO link Tx4obama Jan 2014 #35
Thank you, Tx.. not worthy! Cha Jan 2014 #43
thanks for link.. hard to follow the thread without it :) Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #51
Thanks for the heads up about this, bettyellen! R B Garr Jan 2014 #36
Thank you, bettyellen, for the thread! Cha Jan 2014 #44
k&r... spanone Jan 2014 #49
K & R defacto7 Jan 2014 #52
Much better theory Rilgin Jan 2014 #54
The FULL Maddow show regarding Christie is now uploaded on the MSNBC website - link below Tx4obama Jan 2014 #55
Thank you, Tx.. I still haven't watched yet.. and Cha Jan 2014 #60
CAN'T WAtch vid concreteblue Jan 2014 #57
There is a shorter 8 minute excerpt on MEDIAite on the link below Tx4obama Jan 2014 #58
Thanks for your additions here Tx! I was just typing as she was telling the tale, and bettyellen Jan 2014 #71
The show is podcast and can be downloaded for one day only bananas Jan 2014 #79
Makes sense. jsr Jan 2014 #61
I want to know more about the supreme court justice whose husband works in Christie's office dansolo Jan 2014 #63
Good point. ananda Jan 2014 #65
Anybody in politics Delphinus Jan 2014 #84
Good question! He may have really tipped his hand with that! Let's see the cards. bettyellen Jan 2014 #69
this was all I could find on the husband, he stays out of the press….. bettyellen Jan 2014 #76
That was my exact thought while watching Rachel unc70 Jan 2014 #81
It's crazy Dorian Gray Jan 2014 #64
"Is there no one who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?" hatrack Jan 2014 #66
That bit of Puglover Jan 2014 #67
K&R & Bookmarked nt stevenleser Jan 2014 #68
This makes much more sense than some petty vendetta. This makes MUCH more sense. myrna minx Jan 2014 #72
Is there any chance Federal "Sandy" money could have been used Please proceed Jan 2014 #73
this has been the subject of gossip for a while… the Ft Lee mayor also mentioned bettyellen Jan 2014 #75
Here's the thing, too Aerows Jan 2014 #77
Saw the story last night...makes a lot more sense to me. nt truebluegreen Jan 2014 #78
added link to podcast, since the OP was rather sparse w/ info: bettyellen Jan 2014 #80
So now there are two Conspiracy Theories regarding the why there was rhett o rick Jan 2014 #82
I think it really can be a combo of who they wanted to hurt that put them over the edge bettyellen Jan 2014 #83
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»R Maddow is getting into ...»Reply #46