Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Laxman

(2,433 posts)

11. Christie and Loretta Weinberg...

Reply to avebury (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:35 PM

Jan 2014

HATE each other. Sticking it to her is an absolutely plausible reason. However, a lot of mysterious things have happened to towns with leaders who did not fall into line with Christie's wishes. He wanted that "bi-partisan" mantle bad. Just look at his press conference today. He must have said bi-partisan 20 times.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The thing I don't believe about Christie's bridge scandal.... [View all] TeamPooka Jan 2014 OP

Building an image as a bipartisan can doer. Warren Stupidity Jan 2014 #1

He was 30 points ahead in the polls. Why would he care? TeamPooka Jan 2014 #2

2016 . . . Journeyman Jan 2014 #3

Yep ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #5

Maddow is breaking a new theory about what it's really about. Tx4obama Jan 2014 #4

It is not about the Mayor's endorsement. avebury Jan 2014 #6

I'm still at the office but dvr the show everynight and watch when i get home. Awesome TeamPooka Jan 2014 #8

Christie and Loretta Weinberg... Laxman Jan 2014 #11

Rachel Maddow had a story on this tonight jeff47 Jan 2014 #7

ahhh. Much more understandable now as part of a true political war. Thank you TeamPooka Jan 2014 #9

Rachel Maddow's alternative theory makes MUCH more sense. Her theory is catbyte Jan 2014 #10