General Discussion

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)

38. interesting. There are tons of scientists physicists included who put out a hypothesis

Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:10 AM

Jan 2014

that cannot be tested at the present time. Hell, in has just been in the past couple of hundred years that we have been able to test the theories of scientists of centuries ago. Until it is tested and evidence is found it is just a hypothesis, but there is nothing wrong with that. It's an interesting hypothesis.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dr. Robert Lanza, considered one of the leading scientists in the word... [View all] 1monster Jan 2014 OP

Consciousness creates the universe is basic Scientology. postulater Jan 2014 #1

Sounds like bullshit to me. GeorgeGist Jan 2014 #2

... Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #3

Aaand there it is. ProgressSaves Jan 2014 #10

Cable boxes don't get satellite signals Fumesucker Jan 2014 #4

He's a medical doctor, not a quantum physicist. Marr Jan 2014 #5

Oh dear, quantum mechanics. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #6

Cold But Fair, Sir.... The Magistrate Jan 2014 #11

Strictly speaking, magic DOES exist. sir pball Jan 2014 #47

Arguments from authority in science are invalid. longship Jan 2014 #7

Exacerbated times a million when such authority is speaking outside their field. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #8

Yup, that's always a warning sign. longship Jan 2014 #12

thank you for posting this magical thyme Jan 2014 #9

I don't have an axe to grind here; but I'm always amazed at how people who have 1monster Jan 2014 #15

He happens to be a biologist / biochemist, so it's unsurprising that he would propose a biocentrist magical thyme Jan 2014 #21

Precisely. He's a biochemist. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #27

It's an untestable hypothesis, so it's more philosophy than science. Codeine Jan 2014 #13

Woo. And because he's selling a book, I guess it may also be quackery. Orsino Jan 2014 #46

"We don't get it so we are going to denounce it and denigrate it as 'woo.' Sneer." - SMs* Berlum Jan 2014 #14

;:o) 1monster Jan 2014 #17

Isn't he the father or related to the shooter LukeFL Jan 2014 #16

because he happens to have the same last name? seriously? magical thyme Jan 2014 #19

Nope Dash87 Jan 2014 #20

mental masterbation leftyohiolib Jan 2014 #18

This is the Secret of Life. CanSocDem Jan 2014 #22

I'd like to believe this...splains a lot! Auntie Bush Jan 2014 #23

None of us know because none of us are dead, Holly_Hobby Jan 2014 #24

Is there a testable experiment or prediction anywhere in there? ThoughtCriminal Jan 2014 #25

Why do you hate science? Orrex Jan 2014 #26

My answer to the Great Question is superior! NuclearDem Jan 2014 #29

No. TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #36

Three articles that show Lanza for the crackpot he is... SidDithers Jan 2014 #28

That's gonna leave a mark! opiate69 Jan 2014 #30

Just saying - LibertyLover Jan 2014 #41

Yeah, but I'm just echoing the attempted insult from this dumbass thread... SidDithers Jan 2014 #43

Oh, well in that case - LibertyLover Jan 2014 #45

FFS... you can't credential yourself out of crack-pot science cthulu2016 Jan 2014 #31

How are his credentials valid? DemocraticWing Jan 2014 #32

Yup, it's an argument from authority, nothing more. n/t X_Digger Jan 2014 #35

He's a believer Warpy Jan 2014 #33

Woo is woo. Archae Jan 2014 #34

Plenty of people are reliable in one area, but completely whacked in another bhikkhu Jan 2014 #37

interesting. There are tons of scientists physicists included who put out a hypothesis liberal_at_heart Jan 2014 #38

And one more, to finish off the thread completely... SidDithers Jan 2014 #39

Get off his lawn, Sid!!!! nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #40

I think he misinterpreted the double-slit experiment. Dash87 Jan 2014 #42

some scientists believe in creationism. so what? nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #44