Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
9. I actually consider him the most dangerous GOP candidate.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:43 AM
Jan 2014

Yes, he's unpopular with the far-right. But I think the far-right voters who would simply stay home are no greater in number than what he'd gain in the middle (over a more conservative pick). This would be particularly true if Hillary is the Democratic nominee. She may be considered not nearly left-leaning enough for many people here, but she is utterly despised by the right. She could easily offset any demotivational effect on the far-right base that Christie's nomination created. They hate her. But knock Christie out, and the middle would swing hard towards Hillary.

A moderate, "RINO" candidate remains the GOP's best chance. It didn't work last time not because Romney was a relative moderateb, ut because he was a really unlikable asshole, a rather obvious sociopath. Asshole though Christie may be, he's not remotely in Mittens' league in that regard.

I'd much rather the GOP nominate someone like Cruz.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe I'm missing it but ...»Reply #9