Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(28,705 posts)

13. Happy to help anyway

Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:27 AM

Jan 2014

Your past swings in being able to assess reality on the subject long ago removed your opinion of me from the list of things I care about.

Here are a couple authoritative sources:

http://hps.org/documents/environmental_radiation_fact_sheet.pdf

http://www.ncrppublications.org/Reports/160

The second source is expensive, but the piece you're looking for is summarized in the USA column of the wikipedia entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_radiation

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ALL THE BEST, SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED, INFORMATION ON FUKUSHIMA IMPACTS [View all] Bonobo Jan 2014 OP

Thanks for the science. n/t Yo_Mama Jan 2014 #1

Even here at DU there are some who would rather spread panic. hobbit709 Jan 2014 #2

thanks Bonobo. mahina Jan 2014 #3

It's just math MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #4

Lord I hope this is right. TEPCO's track record keeps me skeptical. Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #5

Thanks, Bonobo, R&K nt longship Jan 2014 #6

I read this article in Popular Mechanics too madokie Jan 2014 #7

Testing makes up a very small part of the "normal radiation levels" FBaggins Jan 2014 #8

I was hoping Bonobo would give me an answer madokie Jan 2014 #12

Happy to help anyway FBaggins Jan 2014 #13

I'm sorry but I can't answer that question. Bonobo Jan 2014 #18

Thanks madokie Jan 2014 #22

That would be due to background radiation from granite, probably Spider Jerusalem Jan 2014 #19

not buying it maindawg Jan 2014 #9

Tell ya what... RC Jan 2014 #10

I know RIGHT! snooper2 Jan 2014 #11

The stupid, it burns. jeff47 Jan 2014 #15

Exactly! you never learned that in science class? snooper2 Jan 2014 #16

heh uppityperson Jan 2014 #20

Do you trust simple math? Try out the inverse square law. geek tragedy Jan 2014 #14

Well said. nt Bonobo Jan 2014 #17