Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: LA Times: Non-smokers "have the right not to be sickened by the choices of others" [View all]OwnedByCats
(805 posts)79. I wouldn't say Nazi
More like Nanny state. It's all fine and dandy to regulate that you must not smoke in certain areas, I agree with that. What I would not support is telling people what to do in their own homes (unless they rent and aren't allowed to smoke per their lease agreement or whatever), or outside secluded from everyone else. It's a slippery slope and if you're not very careful, something you like to do could be attacked also.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
LA Times: Non-smokers "have the right not to be sickened by the choices of others" [View all]
alp227
Jan 2014
OP
One smoker has the capability to invade the personal space of 100 non-smokers in a closed space.
onehandle
Jan 2014
#1
Don't try to tell me what to do. You said "you know my answer." I don't.
Comrade Grumpy
Jan 2014
#68
I sometimes remind people that smoking tobacco is *not* an illegal activity.
Arkansas Granny
Jan 2014
#2
yea i said that and stand by that. i am sorry if that offends but smoking needs to go and
leftyohiolib
Jan 2014
#41
Given the choice between sharing the world with smokers or those who'd put humans in pens
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#52
I've seen fully enclosed smoking areas at airports, smoking pens. They exist already.nt
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#98
incentive, because it would lead to healthier people which is a good thing
leftyohiolib
Jan 2014
#73
then he loses, honey. I think the last place nazi talk belongs is here. Mazel tov, honey for your
roguevalley
Jan 2014
#25
of course he did, i believe he knows smoking needs to go but habits r easier to defend than break
leftyohiolib
Jan 2014
#28
Well, banning smoking is exactly the same as the ruthless murder of millions, so there you go.
Arugula Latte
Jan 2014
#26
Non-smokers are free to avoid the smoking areas just as people who don't drink
Arkansas Granny
Jan 2014
#39
smoke disperses and when smokers huddle around entrances to buildings you need to enter
leftyohiolib
Jan 2014
#42
i know people like that my wife's aunt ( who died from smoking related emphysema )
leftyohiolib
Jan 2014
#9
Dispersed smoke in the air doesn't serve you cancer. example is too narrow
leftyohiolib
Jan 2014
#40
"The lung development...was stunted — about 20 percent smaller than average..."
Cerridwen
Jan 2014
#45
The reason I chose my screen name is that I ride a bicycle and I'm constantly breathing car fumes
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#46
It will be interesting to see some of the same people who fought against cigarette smoking
hughee99
Jan 2014
#49
I don't disagree on this, but there are people who are looking to ban cigarettes all sorts of places
hughee99
Jan 2014
#54
I just know that life became a lot easier when smokers couldn't smoke in public buildings.
KitSileya
Jan 2014
#50
I don't blindly cross the street, I don't eat raw or rotten meat, I don't gulp large quantities of
DrDan
Jan 2014
#69
I stay away from smokers, as I said . . . that means I recognize the science surrounding
DrDan
Jan 2014
#92
ok - (although you are the one who continues to bring up 3rd hand smoking, not me)
DrDan
Jan 2014
#96
If we can get rid of the smokers, can we also get rid of the gungeoneers, too? nt
valerief
Jan 2014
#64
Both have equal rights under the law...as long as we're all choosing to wear perfume
ScreamingMeemie
Jan 2014
#81