Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Initech

(108,674 posts)
21. But you could argue that the property creator isnt the copyright holder.
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 02:23 PM
Mar 2012

Ask Trent Reznor who had a huge fight with his label over intellectual property that he ultimately disbanded his group because of it. Ask Radiohead who made more money giving their album away for free than they ever did on a label.

The fact is that the label or corporate entity is the one in charge of the intellectual property not the content creator. The RIAA works for them - they couldn't give less of a shit about the content creators or the fans. They only care about the labels and their executives, that's it - they don't give a shit about anyon else.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does downloading stuff from Youtube count? limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #1
Sounds like they're concentrating on P2P networks - so probably not GOTV Mar 2012 #3
Almost certainly not. Youtube has a policy MineralMan Mar 2012 #7
Huh, I thought they already did that. eShirl Mar 2012 #2
No worries here. I don't download pirated MineralMan Mar 2012 #4
I disagree. randome Mar 2012 #5
Depends on what the file contains. MineralMan Mar 2012 #6
how do you know it is copyrighted before you download it? d_r Mar 2012 #8
And, on the sites where those videos, games, and music MineralMan Mar 2012 #9
What if you must download the work in order to use the product you purchased? Occulus Mar 2012 #10
With P2P systems, free and copyrighted works are lumped together. randome Mar 2012 #12
When someone loans you a CD, they no longer have MineralMan Mar 2012 #16
I don't think the owner gets to determine as much as you think. randome Mar 2012 #18
Here is an example d_r Mar 2012 #20
Remember - it never was or will be about copyright - it's about maximizing profits. Initech Mar 2012 #11
Copyright exists to make sure the owner of a work can profit from it. MineralMan Mar 2012 #17
But you could argue that the property creator isnt the copyright holder. Initech Mar 2012 #21
On a case-by-case basis. MineralMan Mar 2012 #23
"it won't yet lead to a total cut off" BadgerKid Mar 2012 #13
I sincerely doubt this will be allowed to go forward. randome Mar 2012 #14
You mean inspecting content? BadgerKid Mar 2012 #15
Yeah, you're probably right. randome Mar 2012 #19
Would VPN's make this whole thing useless? Zalatix Mar 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RIAA and ISPs to police y...»Reply #21