Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Pholus

(4,062 posts)

1. The problem is that they THINK they do....

Reply to bigdarryl (Original post)

Sun Jan 12, 2014, 10:16 AM

Jan 2014

We might find a million flaws with them, but their paid for propoganda has a million flaws with our guys.

Therefore by equivalency their candidates are as good as ours.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I didn't know the republicans had strong candidates for 2016 [View all] bigdarryl Jan 2014 OP

The problem is that they THINK they do.... Pholus Jan 2014 #1

it's all relative. remember the potential candidates they're used to fielding. unblock Jan 2014 #2

I think Christie would have been a strong candidate. sufrommich Jan 2014 #3

Christie would have had as much of a chance as Perry. Now he has none. randome Jan 2014 #5

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #4

Marco Rubio is still delusional about his chances. eom mfcorey1 Jan 2014 #6

Hey Ted Nugent has said he is considering a run Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #7