Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

randome

(34,845 posts)

5. Christie would have had as much of a chance as Perry. Now he has none.

Reply to sufrommich (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 12, 2014, 10:35 AM

Jan 2014

I don't understand this obsession some have with 2016. Not only is the President the weakest of the three branches of government but Republicans don't have a chance to win the WH for the foreseeable future.

2014.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I didn't know the republicans had strong candidates for 2016 [View all] bigdarryl Jan 2014 OP

The problem is that they THINK they do.... Pholus Jan 2014 #1

it's all relative. remember the potential candidates they're used to fielding. unblock Jan 2014 #2

I think Christie would have been a strong candidate. sufrommich Jan 2014 #3

Christie would have had as much of a chance as Perry. Now he has none. randome Jan 2014 #5

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #4

Marco Rubio is still delusional about his chances. eom mfcorey1 Jan 2014 #6

Hey Ted Nugent has said he is considering a run Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #7