Suggestion - If you are a fairly active DUer, use your jury blacklist

[Ohio Joe]

313. So... What? Skinner is lying? Or stupid?

"Others have posted how it is done here."

People have posted how they 'think' it could be done... Yet it is not happening, that is the fact.

"The evidence is in the jury results sent out."

There have indeed been some bad Jury results but not very many... That you might disagree with a given result does not mean it is unwarranted... It means you are not of the same opinion of what belongs here as the majority of DU.

"The subject matter of a post not in agreement with the usual suspects world view, even though there is nothing otherwise wrong with the post. The alerter's comments not fitting the contents of the post. Juror's comments not in tune with the contents of the post."

Again... This is not some group of "usual suspects" that can rig a Jury... It is a fantasy to keep up that argument... You have zero ability to know who is on a given Jury unless they put their name, and very few of us do, so to claim you know who they are is simply not true. Most times, if a post is hidden, it is because it is not appropriate for DU, not because of any one groups thoughts.

"I could post a few, but then you'd argue otherwise, so why bother?

The pile-ons are from a certain segment of DU. And always seems to be the same people."

Repeating the meme of the rigged Jury will never make it true.