Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Woody Allen may well be a despicable creep and pedophile. He's still a great artist [View all]WeekendWarrior
(1,437 posts)75. It was the PROSECUTOR who said it
and a panel of judges found his behavior unacceptable. And prosecutors say a lot of things. I've seen plenty of them insist a wrongfully convicted man was rightfully convicted, even in the face of DNA evidence that proves otherwise.
Like I said, there's not proof. And, honestly, if a prosecutor felt there WAS enough evidence, he would have prosecuted. Lack of evidence has never stopped them before.
I find it interesting that people here on DU, who claim to be progressive, are so willing to convict Allen in the face of no credible evidence whatsoever.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
129 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Woody Allen may well be a despicable creep and pedophile. He's still a great artist [View all]
cali
Jan 2014
OP
Me, too. I'm amazed they gave him that award. I'm not surprised he didn't show.
valerief
Jan 2014
#80
She was a great artist. Her work is still studied in film school and film appreciation classes.
kelly1mm
Jan 2014
#28
David Lynch? The guy's a bit of a weirdo, but I've never heard of him doing anything especially
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#98
Everybody has to draw their own line - I do it, you do it, we all do it, consciously or not.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#97
they're just sculptures, nothing more. They're just poems, nothing more. they're just paintings
cali
Jan 2014
#13
So nobody is allowed to have an opinion about anything that isn't their metier?
stopbush
Jan 2014
#112
He was a young girl's father, then he had sex with her. He did that all by himself.
Squinch
Jan 2014
#69
Cardinal Law is said to be a good conversationalist....I don't wanna talk to him, though.
MADem
Jan 2014
#30
Look, everyone here is expressing "opinion" -- even you. And no one's, not even yours, not even
MADem
Jan 2014
#63
And the singer of that tune got the same award they just gave "Woody!" (Apt name, I suppose, the
MADem
Jan 2014
#79
Because Mia Farrow's daughter (not Soon-yi Previn, another one) says he abused her.
Donald Ian Rankin
Jan 2014
#40
The obvious rejoinder is "he may be a great artist, but he's still a despicable creep".
Donald Ian Rankin
Jan 2014
#42
Agreed. I don't know about the creep/pedophile part. But, he is a great artist.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2014
#46
Hello? FICTION. Plus, great literature, unlike pap, is more than a story-line.
WinkyDink
Jan 2014
#55
And IIRC, Humbert in Nabokov's mind was more "evil rapist" than "dashing anti-hero."
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#102
Actually, I think the -judge- said the opposite. Which is why he never got prosecuted.
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#95
Funny how someone can be cruel to dogs and be scorned...but being a molestor is ok..
HipChick
Jan 2014
#61
Is there an overlap of those who hold Vick to one standard and Allen to another?
LanternWaste
Jan 2014
#116
Both should be scorned for their actions. Neither's talent should be dismissed because of them.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#104
I think pretentious is the word you're looking for. Though I enjoyed Annie Hall. But I don't
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#96
I agree that an artist's life is totally separate from their work.
Waiting For Everyman
Jan 2014
#109