Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats plead with Obama to abandon Social Security cut [View all]rpannier
(24,927 posts)222. Since plead is in the title of the article what would you suggest?
That he omit it?
That he not post it?
What is your objection?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
258 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Our Federal Reserve is still buying seventy-five billion in "Derivatives" from banks every month.
another_liberal
Jan 2014
#116
It is even more sad that some won't acknowledge it even when is is bearing down on them.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jan 2014
#4
BHO is a former Reagan Republican. He said so himself. Why won't people believe him ???
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#149
That is because there is no Democratic Party. Only the Repug party and TeaParty. NT
bonniebgood
Jan 2014
#232
Don't you know that this post, Democrat's uneasyness with PBO's proposed cuts, and anybody
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jan 2014
#3
Isn't he the senator that spent a day shadowing a homeless man to know what it's like?
CrispyQ
Jan 2014
#117
For the rest of his term, and I'm no fucking mind reader or Rocket scientist but....
Phlem
Jan 2014
#8
Or maybe he agrees with them on several issues? If so, I wish he would have told us back in 2008.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#245
It's really upside down when there are those who think Christie is Presidential material
VPStoltz
Jan 2014
#16
Lame duck president fouling the waters for democrats at midterm. uggghhh.
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2014
#17
Looks like the SS give-away, will be just in time to hurt the DEMS at midterms.
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#154
PAY NO ATTENTION TO DEMOCRATIC SENATORS WHEN THEY VOICE CONCERN OVER SOCIAL SECURITY
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#129
If you exempt the elderly and disabled, you have exempted 100% of benficiaries of Social Security
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#182
Can YOU maybe, answer a question I have been asking for years since Bush et al
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#247
Thank you for your civil response. I do see your pov and obviously I do not agree that Democrats
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#249
I'm glad this is in GD. I got banned from the Obama forum for saying what I think
loudsue
Jan 2014
#18
We should start a forum of our own: people who got kicked out of the Obama forum
loudsue
Jan 2014
#37
Or it would be populated with a bunch of anti-President Obama folks ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2014
#56
Short answer: you don't know, and are trusting the military and the CIA to not lie to us.
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#239
Wow you make it sound good. I don't see most of it your way but let's hope you are right.
A Simple Game
Jan 2014
#151
I'm in. No dissent allowed over there. Just pretty pictures, and praise of all things Obama.
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#157
You probably were "banned" because you insist on promoting a false narrative ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2014
#55
So, you believe that most Social Security recipient's benefits are too generous?
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#107
If the offer is okay then you are saying benefits are too generous except for the very bottom
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#177
So, you appear to be supportive of the offer as some type of political calculation.
Broward
Jan 2014
#184
It exempts only those on means tested benefits, it includes those on Social Security. It just does.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#187
he gives them are things they have wanted for decades, but they don't dare because it would be
DJ13
Jan 2014
#195
Social Security has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the debt or the deficit
MiniMe
Jan 2014
#20
'Social Security has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the debt or the deficit.."
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#159
once again the far left are standing in the way of entitlement reform
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2014
#23
Evidently it is their own elections that concern them, not the plight of those depending on SS
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#27
His proposal is at this link and it sure as hell is not what you claim it is....
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#188
Why do you defend "crying wolf" by forwarding this proposal over and over then?
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#229
Isn't that the point of the article posted? That Democrats are trying to make sure
SomethingFishy
Jan 2014
#48
If it isn't going to happen then stop the phony discussions and move on to the people's business
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#181
As a 60 something DU'er, my first inclination is to say something very rude.
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2014
#46
That's the key to the whole thing. Truthfully, as one going on SS shortly, I'd be for that.
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#99
I wish folks would sit back and really look at the bind President Obama's
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2014
#104
So wait, they would be ok with screwing us if it wasn't going to cause them problems next fall?
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2014
#34
The first sentence is really telling. It is NOT because it will be so bad for all of us, but so that
robinlynne
Jan 2014
#45
Oh now they need the liberal base? What happened to their corporate 3rd way right leaning centrists?
L0oniX
Jan 2014
#52
On the contrary, that will make his real objectives all the easier to accomplish
FiveGoodMen
Jan 2014
#84
+1. That's the REAL 11-Dimensional Chess. Most everyone is waking up to the fact that WE'VE BEEN
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#162
Regarding Sen. Murphy's statement: whether or not the Rs make concessions...
FlyByNight
Jan 2014
#68
Everybody knows that cuts to SS won't affect the budget one single whit. Even Obama knows it.
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#163
Let's not forget that "Dems" - Prez and Congress - "borrowed" money from SS fund...
polichick
Jan 2014
#95
People who say they trust the President to negotiate the TPP for us should READ THIS! n/t
hughee99
Jan 2014
#108
Yes, the President does seem to keep trying to put Social Security on the cutting block
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#137
The "Grand Betrayal" timed to cost DEMS the midterm election for 2014? Obama can then go farther to
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#174
Where's the logic in that? What reason do you suggest exists for making proposals which are not
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#167
Thank you. And what a dishonest, despicable Third Way talking point
woo me with science
Jan 2014
#142
The senators are right. If you want liberal Democrats to stay home, just put that chained
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#146
I hope they are also planning to give back to me, some of the bread I paid into SS over a lifetime.
meti57b
Jan 2014
#196
Considering inflation, the lousy 1% cost of living increase they give to SS is pathetic.
liberal_at_heart
Jan 2014
#203
maybe he's doing this on purpose in response to the great sit-out of 2010 or maybe
leftyohiolib
Jan 2014
#209
Obama, your legacy isn't to do a deal with the repukes, it's to whip their ass
on point
Jan 2014
#214