Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There's a brain-dead corpse whose family is being forced [View all]HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)79. A corpse incubating a fetus
Excuse me, but the organs cannot be used without PERMISSION before being donated, but a CORPSE can be used as an incubator? Total disrespect for the DEAD. Living or dead don't matter, only the unborn. What happens after birth, these people could care less.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And that is the problem. They didn't unplug anyone from mechanical support.
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#20
Micropreemies are likely to be severely damaged due to brain bleeds and the like
Hekate
Jan 2014
#72
21 weeks now...it was only 14 weeks when this travesty of human rights began....
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#92
Why do you continue saying fetus is alive? Proof of that? And is it ethical to go against what
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#154
There is no proof it is alive. Is it ethical to keep mechanical support on someone against their and
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#158
Fetal heartbeats can be detected in fetuses that fail to develop a brain at all.
jeff47
Jan 2014
#111
the very, very long list of men's rights posts you've compiled makes it not surprising
CreekDog
Jan 2014
#165
Yes or no? Is it ethical to force her to stay on mechanical support even though she and her family
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#82
Tests? Tests? Again there are not tests at 14 weeks and still none at 21 weeks...IT was deprived
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#95
You state that there is no possibility of the fetus becoming a healthy child,
hedgehog
Jan 2014
#104
That is a strawman no starter...the fetus was only 14 weeks when this started and the plug
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#107
I just finished reading the 2013 Texas abortion law before posting...abortion in Texas is LEGAL up
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#126
I see you are correct the supremes decided not to recind in a 5 4 decision...but again what
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#139
Is it ethical to force life support on someone who has said, whose family says, no?
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#151
But using that logic, if she was 9 months pregnant but brain dead, insurance can refuse
LisaL
Jan 2014
#32
I would think hospital would bill the insurance and insurance would have to pay to avoid the
LisaL
Jan 2014
#52
Thats not how it works most of the time but yes they can refuse...insurance companies make
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#99
Is it ethical to keep her on mechanical support? She and her family said they didn't want it. Is it
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#40
Yes or no? Is it ethical to force her to stay on mechanical support even though she and her family
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#55
Did you miss this question? I know it can be confusing to keep the discussions straight.
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#59
If the family wishes to uphold her wishes, it is the family's business. wtf?
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#60
Are you really this dense or are you just baiting people to get your jolly's off.
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#100
Try answering the points I made in #76--or anybody else's. Skip the canned speech; we've seen it...
Hekate
Jan 2014
#160
Why do you say the fetus isn't in the same state as the woman? Heart beats in both.
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#15
Did anyone verify that the fetus has a functioning brain? No. Does anyone beyond you think
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#24
Yet you claim "The fetus isn't" braindead. Since you have no clue, how can you claim that?
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#39
I did say the people doing the forcing, yes? And unless the dead woman doing the incubating agreed
Solly Mack
Jan 2014
#11
Should the fetus come out impaired, I'm sure all those well intentioned *people
Solly Mack
Jan 2014
#19
All the while voting to shred the safety net for the disabled & impoverished among us.
CrispyQ
Jan 2014
#26
Exactly! But they'll count that forced birth as a 'moral' (coughcough) victory.
Solly Mack
Jan 2014
#29
and then walk away as the Dad is forced to care for an impaired child for life
SoCalDem
Jan 2014
#75
All this will be a walk in the park - if the fetus becomes viable but on being born is
srican69
Jan 2014
#37
Legally they are both dead. brain dead only can incubate a fetus with mechanical and other support.
magical thyme
Jan 2014
#65
Using that logic, it's perfectly fine to turn off life support from a full term pregnant woman.
LisaL
Jan 2014
#67
um... a full term baby can be removed and survive. viability is an important point in this.
PeaceNikki
Jan 2014
#74
Nonsense. What is your motivation in this continuing argument? Life begins at conception?
Hekate
Jan 2014
#76
If the person is brain dead, the laws say hospital has a right to turn off life support.
LisaL
Jan 2014
#141
With a full term pregnant woman, or even a woman at 24 weeks, a baby can be delivered
pnwmom
Jan 2014
#134
" can't recall any stories of a Death Certificate being issued for someone who's still in the...
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#131
They didn't "just issue it". She HAS been moved. And, to be fair, lots of death certs are issued
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#142
Exactly. They did "just issue it" like you wrote. Is it ethical to keep someone on mechanical suppor
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#148
Is it ethical to force life support on someone who has said, whose family says, no?
uppityperson
Jan 2014
#143
Wot? Wait you never heard of anyone signing a death certificate to have someone pop awake on
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#121
WAIT...I GOT AN IDEA. IF they wont declare her dead then technically shes alive and a patient
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#108
Family argues a legally dead person is not a "patient", therefore statute does not apply
stg81
Jan 2014
#61
The very second that child is delivered, the husband needs to file a wrongful birth lawsuit
kestrel91316
Jan 2014
#96
No one is denying that fact. But when you're talking about a family member's loved one....
Th1onein
Jan 2014
#169