General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: All day long I have been fuming about this and I am glad that I waited to post it. I COULD BURN [View all]RainDog
(28,784 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 18, 2014, 10:06 PM - Edit history (1)
It's not a straw man to indicate the same sort of false equivalency with another one. This is done in an absurd manner to point out, easily, the absurdity in the original statement.
I never questioned the incident. So, you are the one who is pretending to be upset by something that wasn't said. Would that be a straw man argument - to put words into people's mouths that weren't said? Or just mere misunderstanding? I don't know. Doesn't matter.
If you don't understand the use of various forms of figurative language to illustrate a point, I'm not really interested in explaining it to you, but you can find lots of resources online.
You might be interested in reading this report - http://www.clasp.org/resources-and-publications/states/0314.pdf
The organization that discusses the work is endorsed by Gwen Moore and is an advocate for solutions to poverty and surrounding issues.
"CLASP is an organization that both parties rely on. Even if members don't agree, they can't run from what CLASP has to say. Their work is solid, thorough and extremely well-respected on the Hill." Gwen Moore, U.S. House of Representatives, D-Wisc.
take care
eta for a "teaching moment" (that should certainly be offensive, I'm sure, to this person.) The person is discussing me as a writer rather than the point of rhetoric, which is the study of figurative language used in persuasive speech, and, thus, often political speech. However, if you read something with your mind in a gutter of hate, you assume I was talking about my own writing, rather than the point of the writing itself. As Buddha noted: Your enemies are your best teachers. They have been for me.