Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Harry Reid: Fast Track Free Trade Bill Goes Nowhere [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)7. Look at the part of the story that actually quotes Reid, rather
than the headline or the editorial commentary in the video.
The only direct quotes from Reid that I noticed in the story are:
Asked if he told Baucus that Reid would make time on the floor of the U.S. Senate to debate the measure, Reid said "No," four times.
"There's a lot of controversy on that, and I'm going to see how that plays out with my caucus and the Senate.," Reid told reporters on Capitol Hill.
As to the first sentence above, does it mean that Reid will never make time on the floor to debate the bill, or only that Reid did not already make a certain statement to Baucus?
As to the second sentence quoted above, what exactly does it mean?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
the leaks are vital to stopping this. We owe a debt of gratitude to Wikileaks and Assange
cali
Jan 2014
#2
Yes, thank you Wikileaks and Assange. Thanks for the reminder. Shows how different
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#32
Gee. Max Baucus is the President's pick for ambassador to China. What a coincidence. nt
GoneFishin
Jan 2014
#9
I guess no health insurance company wanted to hire a retiring 70-year-old crooked politician
Jack Rabbit
Jan 2014
#43
There is absolutely nothing in the trade agreement or any trade agreement thus far
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#11
Per Krugman: manufacturing wages declined 1973 to 1995, have increased since then
pampango
Jan 2014
#12
The chart is clearly labeled "Real wage of production and nonsupervisory workers"
Romulox
Jan 2014
#21
Or through some means we correct our trade imbalance. Perhaps by raising wages here
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#20
They will just hold it up until after the election. They are getting so much negative feedback and
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#29