Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
13. The explanation detailed in the NY Times article is perfectly plausible
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:25 AM
Jan 2014

They (Stevens and Co.) misread the situation. It happens all the time. Government officials are not all-knowing. They're human and fallible like the rest of us. They misread crowds all the time. Hell, in 1979 a mob took over the entire US Embassy in Pakistan and burned it to the ground, killing a US Marine. We hardly ever hear about that (we always hear about Iran).

The explanation we have - a fired up mob in an increasingly unfriendly environment had an odd trigger (that imbecile film) and attacked the facility. Done. US personnel were there for their ordinary business, and didn't realize how unstable the situation was until it was too late. Shit moves slowly because people were caught off guard. I don't understand what's not "plausible" about any of this. It strikes me as not only plausible, but utterly likely.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

True shenmue Jan 2014 #1
My theory on Benghazi. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #2
It wasn't covert when the Republicans cut funding for embassy security. tridim Jan 2014 #5
Nor is that speculative. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #6
But that fact is never included in any reports about the attack. Ever. baldguy Jan 2014 #8
That is my opinion also, we will never know... because it was a covert operation secondwind Jan 2014 #10
Yes. The CIA told the State Department what to say. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #11
The explanation detailed in the NY Times article is perfectly plausible alcibiades_mystery Jan 2014 #13
It's not a theory watoos Jan 2014 #14
Damn liberal media! B Calm Jan 2014 #3
Crazy like a damn fox they are Fumesucker Jan 2014 #4
More blame from whom? merrily Jan 2014 #7
Absolutely. Like the time Pelosi said ''Impeachment is off the table.'' Octafish Jan 2014 #12
True. Media make me so mad I could spit. merrily Jan 2014 #22
Bush was at 90% approval after 9/11. Everyone fell in line. CJCRANE Jan 2014 #21
True, merrily Jan 2014 #23
Like Shrub and Darth Cheney, for Obama and Hillary to get a pass they kairos12 Jan 2014 #9
That's because Republicans don't 'turn the page, look forward not back' Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #15
toon for you n2doc Jan 2014 #16
I have realized that the media does asjr Jan 2014 #17
more blame than bu$h got for starting an 'unnecessary' war..killing HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS spanone Jan 2014 #18
Yes there is a dramatic assymetry to our system. jimlup Jan 2014 #19
That's a tough stick to stick Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has it dawned on DUers th...»Reply #13