Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
8. The legal threshold
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:59 AM
Jan 2014

is a reasonable fear of death or grave bodily harm. A jury will decide based on a lot more information then has currently been reported, whether Reeves was justified in feeling that way or not.

Another relevant legal term is disparity of force, in this case, did Reeves, at 71 years old, maybe with physical impairments not reported, reasonably (something that the jury will decide) believe that a man almost 30 years younger and by current reports much larger and in decent physical shape, be capable of hurting Reeves with his bare hands beyond Reeves ability to defend himself without resorting to a firearm.

Simplified, it's the principle that allows someone 5 feet tall or someone suffering a physical disability to shoot a larger, healthy unarmed attacker.

I am NOT saying Reeves is innocent. I am also not saying he is guilty. There is a lot of information about this none of us are aware of and won't come out until the trial.

Having said that, based on what HAS been reported, Reeves is probably going to jail.










Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TDB: With Guns, the Threa...»Reply #8