Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dan

(5,207 posts)
5. usually the governments
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 01:29 AM
Mar 2012

negotiate a treaty - think it called something 'statue of forces' agreement - which defines that in the case of U.S. soldiers, that the U.S. government/military retains control over the soldier in the event of a criminal act. What sometimes happens, based on the type of incident - is that the soldier is put on trial by the military, charged, discharged - and sometimes turned over to the host country.

In this case - in theory, the soldier was in uniform while committing the acts... so, the military probably wants to retain control over this situation.

It is ugly, regardless of how it plays out...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Isn't there a Afghan crim...»Reply #5