Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
23. True,
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 08:10 PM
Jan 2014

but I am guessing FDR's were high after Pearl Harbor--or would have been if they were doing that kind of polling then (no idea if they were or not, probably not).

Bush's approval ratings did not stay that high. Iraq and Katrina were factors, and deservedly so. By around 2007, his ratings were in the 30s overall, IIRC, and even lower among only Democrats. And Cheney's went down to Congressional levels among people from both parties. I think he was around 9 or 11 in one poll.

Obama had no equivalent of 911, but his approval ratings were quite high after his first election and overall, pretty good for a lot of years in office.

But the comment I made was about criticism. Yes, as another poster pointed out, Pelosi took impeachment off the table, but she and other elected Democrats did criticize Bush plenty publicly. As far as people who are not professional politicians, I heard and participated in tons of criticism about Bush (none of which I regret).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

True shenmue Jan 2014 #1
My theory on Benghazi. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #2
It wasn't covert when the Republicans cut funding for embassy security. tridim Jan 2014 #5
Nor is that speculative. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #6
But that fact is never included in any reports about the attack. Ever. baldguy Jan 2014 #8
That is my opinion also, we will never know... because it was a covert operation secondwind Jan 2014 #10
Yes. The CIA told the State Department what to say. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #11
The explanation detailed in the NY Times article is perfectly plausible alcibiades_mystery Jan 2014 #13
It's not a theory watoos Jan 2014 #14
Damn liberal media! B Calm Jan 2014 #3
Crazy like a damn fox they are Fumesucker Jan 2014 #4
More blame from whom? merrily Jan 2014 #7
Absolutely. Like the time Pelosi said ''Impeachment is off the table.'' Octafish Jan 2014 #12
True. Media make me so mad I could spit. merrily Jan 2014 #22
Bush was at 90% approval after 9/11. Everyone fell in line. CJCRANE Jan 2014 #21
True, merrily Jan 2014 #23
Like Shrub and Darth Cheney, for Obama and Hillary to get a pass they kairos12 Jan 2014 #9
That's because Republicans don't 'turn the page, look forward not back' Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #15
toon for you n2doc Jan 2014 #16
I have realized that the media does asjr Jan 2014 #17
more blame than bu$h got for starting an 'unnecessary' war..killing HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS spanone Jan 2014 #18
Yes there is a dramatic assymetry to our system. jimlup Jan 2014 #19
That's a tough stick to stick Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has it dawned on DUers th...»Reply #23