Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Edward Snowden Vindicated: Obama Speech Acknowledges Changes Needed To Surveillance - HuffPo [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)34. You have cites to support that Snowden is in favor of no intelligence services at all for the US? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Edward Snowden Vindicated: Obama Speech Acknowledges Changes Needed To Surveillance - HuffPo [View all]
WillyT
Jan 2014
OP
I bet most libertarians also love ice cream and our Constitution and sunny days and Sundays
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#69
No self respecting Democrat would ever give a click to that blog. Is it still going?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#38
You might enjoy the press conference given by whistleblowers Binney, Tice, et al.
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#70
I think we should prosecute no one until Bush is prosecuted! Free Bernie Madoff!!! nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#66
I never noticed him asking for shit. He exposed crimes he witnessed that is the duty of any citizen
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#40
Didn't the President say something about revising the NSA 3wks. before the Snowden leak?
The Wielding Truth
Jan 2014
#36
Since this has been upheld dozens of times as Constitutional by the courts...
ConservativeDemocrat
Jan 2014
#30
That's what I thought also, that the violations of Constitutional Rights using 9/11 was the heart of
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#44
You have cites to support that Snowden is in favor of no intelligence services at all for the US? nt
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#34
Given all he's broadcast about how we collect from foreign countries TO those countries
ConservativeDemocrat
Jan 2014
#42
Got a link to this: 'He's told the Chinese ... He's told the Russians' I've asked
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#45
You mean he spoke to the press? We know that, that's what Whistle Blowers generally do.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#51
Are you seriously trying to say, Sabrina, that no one in China reads Chinese newspapers?
ConservativeDemocrat
Jan 2014
#58
When the NYT published the Pentagon Papers are you seriously saying that no one in Russia
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#60
Have there been any indictments against War Criminals, Wall St Criminals, Torturers, people who lie
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#46
Sabrina, did you get a chance to watch the news conference by the other whistleblowers including
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#72
vin·di·cate [vin-di-keyt] - to clear, as from an accusation, imputation, suspicion, or the like
baldguy
Jan 2014
#50
The biggest changes will be to stop future "Snowdens" from getting access to sensistive data.
DCBob
Jan 2014
#56
We need more Snowdens, Mannings, and whistle blowers to get "transparency" and action.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2014
#67