Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Unfortunately, I find myself in agreement with Rand Paul today. [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)137. Agree. Fuck Rand/Ron Paul,
....but lets try to keep the 4th Amendment limitations on our Government.
Yes?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I really, REALLY like that Amendment.
Hate to see it go.
You DO know that sooner of later a Republican or worse WILL sit in the Oval Office?
Do you know that your odds of being harmed by a "terrorist" are greater than being struck by lightening?
Do you know that the ongoing Spying on Americans has not stopped a SINGLE terrorist attack?
[font size=3]
Rampant Government Secrecy and Democracy can not co-exist.
Persecution of Whistle Blowers and Democracy can not co-exist.
Government surveillance of the citizenry and Democracy can not co-exist.
Secret Laws and Democracy can not co-exist.
Secret Courts and Democracy can not-co-exist.
Our Democracy depends on an informed electorate.
You either believe in Democracy,
or you don't.
It IS that simple.
Rampant Government Secrecy and Democracy can not co-exist.
Persecution of Whistle Blowers and Democracy can not co-exist.
Government surveillance of the citizenry and Democracy can not co-exist.
Secret Laws and Democracy can not co-exist.
Secret Courts and Democracy can not-co-exist.
Our Democracy depends on an informed electorate.
You either believe in Democracy,
or you don't.
It IS that simple.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Very bad job actually, if the purpose was to show 'inconsistency'. Good job if it was to show
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#102
Can't someone just actually feel vomit rising to even be subjected to Rand Paul praise?
VanillaRhapsody
Jan 2014
#135
The same mental process is at work whether one hero worships a public figure no matter how
GoneFishin
Jan 2014
#146
I see no inconsistency there. Thanks for the link. He is for the rule of law, and is consistent
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#100
That wasn't the topic, I'll be happy to veer off to another issue when we resolve the one you
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#105
Topic "rule of law" and "consistency" Relevant: droning a liquor store robber n/t
ProSense
Jan 2014
#108
Topic rule of law: Stay on topic and if you have answers to questions about your claims, provide
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#109
Is Rand Paul being consistent in support of killing a liquor store robber with a drone? n/t
ProSense
Jan 2014
#111
You didn't use that to prove inconsistency. You used a link directly related to the topic under
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#116
I asked the question regarding the link you used to prove, something. I'm not in the habit
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#120
The US Constitution is the Law of the Land. If you run for elected office you take an oath to
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#129
"The US Constitution is the Law of the Land." Is Citizens United a "law of the land"?
ProSense
Jan 2014
#131
Wow, I could not agree with Prosense on this. That was MY position also, and still is of course
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#113
Was Joe Biden being 'fundamental' when he made that statement about the Constitution, secret laws
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#118
What do you think of Biden's statement about Constitutional rights. He appears to agree with Paul?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#121
What do you think of Biden agreeing with Paul? Do you disagree with Biden's statement?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#124
Excellent post, bvar. Shameful to see what is going on here on this forum. I came here BECAUSE
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#126
I have never been tempted to visit the Bog that I recall. I am interested in discussion of the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#142
Liking or not liking an individual is not at issue. I can like someone and disagree with them.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#144
You also probably agree with launching an initiative to combat AIDS in Africa,
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#56
Anyone who says "whatever (person X) believes, I believe the opposite" is an idiot.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2014
#66
If you find yourself uncomfortable with agreeing with Paul, there are plenty
totodeinhere
Jan 2014
#73
Same goes for those who agree with some words by the Pope, plenty of others
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#114
I agree with you about the Pope although it may be off topic for this thread.
totodeinhere
Jan 2014
#149