Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(40,416 posts)

11. The case will be tried on the evidence presented in court.

Sat Jan 18, 2014, 12:33 AM

Jan 2014

The only consideration about Rachel will be whether the jurors watched coverage of the events.

That's what voir dire is for.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Watching Rachael....Help. [View all] busterbrown Jan 2014 OP

Good question GP6971 Jan 2014 #1

Christie Lawyered up already.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #8

I saw that. n/t GP6971 Jan 2014 #10

No. She is not the President or a Judge. DURHAM D Jan 2014 #2

No warrior1 Jan 2014 #3

But isn't that kind of thing just for Duck Dynasty? Kurovski Jan 2014 #9

She's just trying to build a popular consensus for a trial at most Warpy Jan 2014 #5

Thanks and my intuition is that you are correct.. busterbrown Jan 2014 #7

The case will be tried on the evidence presented in court. longship Jan 2014 #11

You gotta worry about people who aren�t aware of the situation. busterbrown Jan 2014 #13

The "convicted in the media" defense has been used many times before. lpbk2713 Jan 2014 #12

No Gothmog Jan 2014 #14