Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who determined that the N...»Reply #46
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Who determined that the NSA and TPP are the most important issues? [View all]

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
46. The TPP is a big obstacle to better wages for working people and for lifting up the middle class.
Reply to ProSense (Original post)
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 01:27 AM
Jan 2014

That is why it is the big issue.

If Obama wants to help the middle class recover and create jobs, why is he promoting the TPP? The TPP will cost us jobs and further harm our ballooning trade deficit. Obama should have stopped the negotiations on the agreement before they started.

And NSA is a big issue because of the development of the internet and the almost complete control of our lives that the NSA's use of the data from the internet and our other electronic communications could give it.

We all support a higher minimum wage and protection for the safety net, but we have to get beyond the Republican Congress to get them.

I live in a strongly Democratic district. Not much I can do to get Republicans out of Congress.

The Democratic Party has to do it, and in order to do it, they need to really represent working people. Sponsoring TPP is not the way to let working people know you are on their side.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

416 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Who determined that the NSA and TPP are the most important issues? [View all] ProSense Jan 2014 OP
Is this a serious thread? YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #1
Yes, very serious. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #2
What happens with the TPP and the NSA are incredibly serious issues... YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #4
Yes, they're serious ProSense Jan 2014 #6
The American people have decided how important they are. That's how democracy works. sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #35
The OP is how "democracy works." I am one of the American people. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #54
Wrong. The corporate media has decided how important they are. No democracy was involved. baldguy Jan 2014 #131
It's difficult if not impossible to bestow obxhead Jan 2014 #279
People can disagree treestar Jan 2014 #148
I certainly agree about income inequality over NSA hfojvt Jan 2014 #180
Nice rant :) Egnever Jan 2014 #3
Thanks. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #11
Wall Street reform? PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #5
Please ProSense Jan 2014 #8
Do you deny that crimes took place on Wall Street? YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #10
What does that have to do with the point of the OP? ProSense Jan 2014 #13
This adminstration's notable lack of prosecutions on Wall Street.... YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #17
Has nothing to do with the point. Nothing. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #22
Yes it does because you listed it as one of the accomplishments BuelahWitch Jan 2014 #33
No, I didn't friggin list prosecution of crimes as "one of the accomplishments". ProSense Jan 2014 #42
The lack of prosecutions is important because it demonstrates that while Obama likes to talk JDPriestly Jan 2014 #62
No, "prosecutions" are not "important" to the point I made. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #82
The lack of prosecutions places in question Obama's sincerity on the economic inequality issue. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #115
Again ProSense Jan 2014 #118
bwahahahahaha. yikes. yikes. yikes. cali Jan 2014 #129
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #144
IKR!?! Rex Jan 2014 #353
Yes! They are. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #280
No, it's not and no amount of text is going to make it relevant to the point. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #281
Because you can not successfully move forward PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #18
Simplistic BS, and that still has nothing to do with my point. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #21
It has everything to do with it. PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #24
No, it doesn't, and maybe you should reread the OP. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #25
Facepalm PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #30
Again, ProSense Jan 2014 #34
Prosense PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #36
There were plenty of legal grounds to prosecute some of the bankers based on old fashioned fraud JDPriestly Jan 2014 #66
Good grief with the proseuctions ProSense Jan 2014 #69
A heads up. There is a twitter hash tag... Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #114
Wow, that's some stupid shit. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #116
Kerrraaaazzzzeeee! Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #117
Someone did a phony alert on this- pretending you're calling the OP a Nazi!! bettyellen Jan 2014 #125
When you're losing an argument on the internet, go for the Godwin. baldguy Jan 2014 #133
You've got the wrong Nazi baldguy Jan 2014 #132
Goebbels was the Reich minister of propaganda n/t Fumesucker Jan 2014 #142
And Goering made the relevant comment. baldguy Jan 2014 #250
The package of regulations didn't deal with the most important cause of the corruption. sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #40
OK, you don't think it goes far enough. What does that have to do with the point? ProSense Jan 2014 #47
You are ignoring one very important thing that has so angered the American people wise politicians sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #65
What do crimes have to do with the point of the OP? ProSense Jan 2014 #75
Mortgage companies and banks committed fraud but the individuals who actually committed the JDPriestly Jan 2014 #56
There is still ProSense Jan 2014 #64
They're too busy with more important things.... YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #9
So why does he support the TPP? flying rabbit Jan 2014 #7
What does that have to do with my point? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #12
To save time I would direct you to the subthread that begins with post 31 flying rabbit Jan 2014 #143
TPP is unrelated to the plight of the middle class income disparity? Bonobo Jan 2014 #14
Did I say that? No, I fucking didn't. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #15
Good to see we agree. nt Bonobo Jan 2014 #28
Bingo. One month before ACA goes live we get Eddie, Glenn, and Senator KY ucrdem Jan 2014 #16
Because the Fourth Amendment is a precious right. It is a matter of safeguarding the Constitution. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #70
The many, many millions buying smartphones and going online don't seem terribly worried ucrdem Jan 2014 #81
"their precious right to privacy" Hissyspit Jan 2014 #119
It's all cool until a Republican wins the Presidency and then neverforget Jan 2014 #165
Single Issue advocates.... stevil Jan 2014 #19
Dismsising a whole slew of great progressive activists as "single issue advocates"? YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #20
Like Julian Assange, the RW Libertarian? And Snowden, the Rand Paul acolyte? ucrdem Jan 2014 #26
What you are doing is dismissing the millions of Democrats who opposed these policies from the sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #44
Sabrina... Snowden, Glenn and Randy do not represent millions of Democrats. ucrdem Jan 2014 #63
This NSA is populated with Bush appointees and loyalists. Why? Why were they not all fired? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #76
McChrystal and Petraeus were also Bush holdovers Obama reappointed. ucrdem Jan 2014 #93
'Snowden and Greenwald didn't expose any' I guess that's why Obama was surprised by what he learned sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #130
"any statutory or ethical violations that would merit disciplinary action," and no, ucrdem Jan 2014 #135
So we were lied to again when we were told that Obama was surprised when he heard they had spied sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #138
You didn't give a link, date, name, quote, or title so all I can surmise ucrdem Jan 2014 #140
Same old bullshit, hunh? Hissyspit Jan 2014 #120
This message was self-deleted by its author stevil Jan 2014 #27
Who stopped fighting back? neverforget Jan 2014 #23
Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #29
Lol okay. How you get to there from that is neverforget Jan 2014 #32
.. Egnever Jan 2014 #48
Personally, I think that economic inequality is the biggest issue of our time. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #72
Because lip service about the minimum wage while pushing the TPP NuclearDem Jan 2014 #98
What ProSense Jan 2014 #101
"Free Trade" has done so much to screw up the economy since the 1990's. That it IS a core issue Armstead Jan 2014 #31
Again, ProSense Jan 2014 #37
"You illustrated my point perfectly." bobduca Jan 2014 #41
God no kidding. nt Puglover Jan 2014 #159
TPP is a continuation of previous "free trade policies" whose results are already known. Armstead Jan 2014 #43
"And we're trying to prevent it from becoming law." ProSense Jan 2014 #52
You are doing your usual nitpicking Armstead Jan 2014 #60
"Perhaps it is not THE most important issue." ProSense Jan 2014 #67
As far as I'm concerned you (anyone) can focus on any damn issue they want Armstead Jan 2014 #77
That's ProSense Jan 2014 #83
I dion't see much of that going on, but feel free to fret about it if you want Armstead Jan 2014 #92
It happens a lot. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #95
So this is whining about how others rank the importance of issues? Why should it matter Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #167
No, it's not. ProSense Jan 2014 #170
Big Ed had seven Democratic congress members come on his show today think Jan 2014 #71
It will be if people ignore it. Which is the answer to your question. Why is it so important now? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #55
Great post, so thanks Sabrina 1. n/t truedelphi Jan 2014 #134
No, ProSense Jan 2014 #145
But Obama is sponsoring TPP. That's why we don't totally believe his sincerity about dealing JDPriestly Jan 2014 #74
So? That's on you...what you choose to believe. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #79
It's about things not adding up - but of course, you know that. polichick Jan 2014 #292
"TPP isn't a fucking law yet"????? OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #294
Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #297
Yes. See post #37 OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #300
Where does ProSense Jan 2014 #302
Yes, that is what it implies. OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #310
No, it doesn't. ProSense Jan 2014 #312
Zzzzzzzzzz OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #314
Tax cuts for the rich, corporate deregulation, 'right-to-work laws', slashing the safety net pampango Jan 2014 #136
How does the TPP affect any one of those things? treestar Jan 2014 #149
You thought the Bush economy was fine? JAYSUS! No wonder folks are world's apart on economics TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #189
Please explain exactly how NAFTA caused it all treestar Jan 2014 #190
What can't be traced to free trade? laundry_queen Jan 2014 #191
No, it's those who claim NAFTA caused consequences treestar Jan 2014 #203
NAFTA included provisionbs that made it eassier and more attractive to remove econoimic sovergnty Armstead Jan 2014 #205
Where have we been unable to set standards for our goods and services? treestar Jan 2014 #207
Try reading the services, financial serv and ag chapters of NAFTA, the WTO, or OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #307
Nice deflection laundry_queen Jan 2014 #206
NAFTA has been accused of causing all sorts of ills treestar Jan 2014 #209
Well, I understand economic issues laundry_queen Jan 2014 #242
How would the TPP make outsourcing even easier? treestar Jan 2014 #262
The percentage of middle class people that benefit enough from the stock market to make a difference laundry_queen Jan 2014 #268
Everyone I know in the middle class has 401ks etc. treestar Jan 2014 #274
1) To countries offering the lowest wages and most lax environmental regulations... SMC22307 Jan 2014 #271
That would happen anyway treestar Jan 2014 #276
The overall results of NAFTA on the working class are negative in both the US and Mexico. ronnie624 Jan 2014 #366
How do we know that? treestar Jan 2014 #381
Your post suggests ronnie624 Jan 2014 #398
uncalled for conclusions about me treestar Jan 2014 #402
I said it was "as if". ronnie624 Jan 2014 #403
The only solution is some type of isolationism? OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #305
You said the economy was fine, I did not say that NAFTA was the sole cause TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #395
Opposition to TPP needs to be mobilized now. moondust Jan 2014 #38
Some dude even gave a boring speech about the NSA today. think Jan 2014 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #45
This is the most sadly amusing post I've seen all day Armstead Jan 2014 #50
Yup...... think Jan 2014 #51
Thankfully MIRT'd before he could start any flames bobduca Jan 2014 #58
Wow welcome to DU Egnever Jan 2014 #73
The TPP is a big obstacle to better wages for working people and for lifting up the middle class. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #46
Potentially, ProSense Jan 2014 #53
The most important issue is free and fair voting. If the corps control our votes, all other issues rhett o rick Jan 2014 #49
Even on this ProSense Jan 2014 #88
Wow that's a lot of schutf and links. But none will matter if our votes go thru rhett o rick Jan 2014 #246
If none of it mattered ProSense Jan 2014 #252
My point is you can register millions and fix gerrymandering rhett o rick Jan 2014 #265
Answer: anyone who is even a casual student of history. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #57
How about you let each DUer decide for themselves what the most important issues kelly1mm Jan 2014 #59
The President did, by giving a speech today about the window dressing you are calling reform bobduca Jan 2014 #61
You decided NSA was important. Not long ago, you were posting almost Hourly Anti-Snowden, Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #68
No, I didn't. I can post about a number of things often and in a timely manner. ProSense Jan 2014 #78
Lol! Revise history much? Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #84
"often and in a timely manner" n/t bobduca Jan 2014 #85
My point stands. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #86
So does mine Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #96
Posting a statement published in WaPo is an "NSA screed"? ProSense Jan 2014 #97
True, not screed this particular one. Just Pro NSA propaganda Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #99
Thanks for acknowledging that the point was false. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #102
That one particular post. You sometimes posted screeds. But it was mostly Pro NSA propaganda Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #106
Nonsense. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #108
Lol!! Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #122
I've come to believe that when that account posts the word "nonsense"... Marr Jan 2014 #231
"I can post about a number of things often and in a timely manner." Hissyspit Jan 2014 #123
"So can other people." ProSense Jan 2014 #146
Do an advanced search for the threads you started between June 6 and July 3 in GD muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #141
Ridiculous ProSense Jan 2014 #160
So are you saying we shouldn't pay any attention to your threads, because you babble muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #161
What the hell are you talking about? Suggestion ProSense Jan 2014 #162
You say 'Volume doesn't equal "most important."'; so I ask you what does equal "most important" muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #163
Good grief ProSense Jan 2014 #164
You still aren't saying how we're meant to know what you think is important muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #166
You're ProSense Jan 2014 #168
So you can't justify starting about 5 NSA threads per day for a month, and then complaining muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #169
What the hell does "starting" threads about the NSA have to do with my point? ProSense Jan 2014 #171
No, it's when you start 150 of them in a month, a clear majority of the threads you started muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #177
Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #181
Your verbal gymnastics are energetic LondonReign2 Jan 2014 #172
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #174
I know, right? LondonReign2 Jan 2014 #179
Again, ProSense Jan 2014 #182
Au contraire LondonReign2 Jan 2014 #183
Here's the deal ProSense Jan 2014 #184
Then every last one of us missed the point. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #413
Not true, but I can see why you'd want to believe that. ProSense Jan 2014 #414
I do have to say, Prosense has always been on top of the NSA. Way back to 2006 Autumn Jan 2014 #249
Yes, ProSense Jan 2014 #293
Nailed it! whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #216
+1 Marr Jan 2014 #229
Our Planet is ultimately the most important issue.. Cha Jan 2014 #80
Agreed the planet is the most important issue. Egnever Jan 2014 #87
.. Cha Jan 2014 #91
Today, Nebraska filed a lawsuit ProSense Jan 2014 #94
President Obama keeps trying to help our Environment without a Cha Jan 2014 #105
As long as it's up here. Just, wow... Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #89
Lame. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #90
Who decided? Well, apparently, a whole bunch of people. Maedhros Jan 2014 #100
He gives a lot of speeches ProSense Jan 2014 #104
Here in Calif., those of us in the know understand that truedelphi Jan 2014 #137
And Jerry Brown created a surplus. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #152
Do you know how he created that surplus? By cutting social programs, by cutting truedelphi Jan 2014 #267
Why do we shoot spies, but only imprison uniformed enemy? MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #103
What ProSense Jan 2014 #107
Sneakiness magnifies these things in the minds of many. MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #110
Fine, that's on you. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #111
you don't think the TPP will impact inequality and the middle class? why do I hear "Aegukka"? MisterP Jan 2014 #109
Nothing in my comments imply that, and I can help with your hearing. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #112
The most important issues? Really? Spider Jerusalem Jan 2014 #113
^^ This ^^ Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #251
This message was self-deleted by its author Hissyspit Jan 2014 #121
The middle class is dying, yes. davidthegnome Jan 2014 #124
some force or group within government or the MIC that ... gives marching orders Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #248
Well, it's killing the working class, which is about 60 or 70% of the country. Deep13 Jan 2014 #126
Bravo. SoapBox Jan 2014 #127
gad. the everlasting gob stopper defense of Obama no matter what. cali Jan 2014 #128
Another ProSense Jan 2014 #150
I agree with you completely... giftedgirl77 Jan 2014 #192
On DU you know the names and they're good at milking the same issues. great white snark Jan 2014 #139
There is only ONE Democrat on record supporting the TPP. Max Baucus think Jan 2014 #156
The NSA is a tempest in a teapot treestar Jan 2014 #147
On another message board, we called what the OP is doing a "Clown Dance"... Romulox Jan 2014 #151
Freerepublic? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #153
The only "ex" freeper we have here on DU agrees with you 98% of the time. Ooops! Romulox Jan 2014 #154
The operative being "ex," huh? ProSense Jan 2014 #155
No. The operative word is "freeper". Rightwing bullshit with a (D) after it remains rightwing Romulox Jan 2014 #157
Obviously, you're an expert ProSense Jan 2014 #158
... MineralMan Jan 2014 #188
Nailed it. HEY EVERYBODY LOOK AT THIS POSITIVE THREAD NOT THOSE OTHER ONES bobduca Jan 2014 #195
+ My household. n/t truedelphi Jan 2014 #269
If ridiculousness is the point, what's the purpose? polichick Jan 2014 #291
151 House Dems Telling President They Will Not Support Outdated Fast Track for TPP Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #173
? ProSense Jan 2014 #176
Incoherent and nonresponsive as usual Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #185
Maybe you can explain what the hell a letter to the President has to do with the OP? ProSense Jan 2014 #187
Maybe if we shout the answers at you they will get through to you? bobduca Jan 2014 #194
No, ProSense Jan 2014 #196
so you deny asking who determined that these issues are most important/ bobduca Jan 2014 #197
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #198
Post removed Post removed Jan 2014 #199
Clearly you don't, but you think you do. ProSense Jan 2014 #200
No clearly you need to think that or you wouldnt seem so condescending in every post bobduca Jan 2014 #201
That's called ProSense Jan 2014 #202
hey now we're into pro-sense response bingo bobduca Jan 2014 #204
Do you ever post anything that makes sense? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #208
my posts make plenty of sense bobduca Jan 2014 #210
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #212
QED bobduca Jan 2014 #213
See what a waste of time that was? Rex Jan 2014 #218
yep bobduca Jan 2014 #226
. Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #254
Obviously, it wasn't ProSense Jan 2014 #365
While I can respect your position, BelgianMadCow Jan 2014 #175
My "framing is outdated"? ProSense Jan 2014 #178
I don't think any one person determined it but... hollowdweller Jan 2014 #186
I went ahead and decided that our surveillance state is pretty goddamned important. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #193
Ok, TPP has nothing to do with income inequality. DireStrike Jan 2014 #211
Wow, you offered your own theory and agreed with it ProSense Jan 2014 #214
I am looking for a job DireStrike Jan 2014 #239
Wait, ProSense Jan 2014 #240
LET THE SPIN BEGIN! whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #215
Couldn't come up with anything better? ProSense Jan 2014 #217
Didn't need to whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #219
Really? ProSense Jan 2014 #222
Well you spend every waking hour posting in this forum whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #228
Wow, ProSense Jan 2014 #232
DU Oxygen... rough estimate is 1 in 10 active posts...like owning the yellow and green properties... Octafish Jan 2014 #336
I like how this thread did not go any way, shape or form as attended. Rex Jan 2014 #220
Yep whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #223
We can dance if we want to! Rex Jan 2014 #224
"This thread" went exactly the way it was anticipated, including ProSense Jan 2014 #225
Nope went to shit and you cannot admit to it, it would cause you to admit to fault. Rex Jan 2014 #227
No it went to debate. ProSense Jan 2014 #234
Like I said, you lack the ability to find fault in yourself Rex Jan 2014 #260
Oh brother ProSense Jan 2014 #261
Debate? You're just angrily snarling at everyone. nt Union Scribe Jan 2014 #286
Maybe that's ProSense Jan 2014 #304
Let him pretend in his fantasy world that this thread went like he wanted it to. Rex Jan 2014 #349
I think they are very important issues. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #221
Good for you. What ProSense Jan 2014 #230
The NSA spying is one of the most important issues to me. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #233
That's fine. You seem ProSense Jan 2014 #236
I suppose you could ask your supervisor. Marr Jan 2014 #235
Yikes! ProSense Jan 2014 #237
What are you implying, Marr? MineralMan Jan 2014 #238
Marr please edit whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #243
I don't know ProSense Jan 2014 #245
Yes, excoriating the guy responsible for the reforms you now praise whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #247
Lots of fun, but evidently you're upset because ProSense Jan 2014 #253
Sad whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #255
Sorry to hear that. ProSense Jan 2014 #256
Well since you seem to know everything whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #257
I didn't claim to "know everything." n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #258
Can't say I expected an answer whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #259
Wow. demmiblue Jan 2014 #244
Valid suggestion in light of the posting pattern. polichick Jan 2014 #296
It seems idiotic to me. I mean, ProSense Jan 2014 #320
Is it "nasty" if it's true? As you know... polichick Jan 2014 #321
It's nasty because ProSense Jan 2014 #322
Could be true about anyone - but the payer would... polichick Jan 2014 #323
Yes, ProSense Jan 2014 #324
Look (as BO always says), I enjoy your posts - but the truth is... polichick Jan 2014 #325
Oh, ProSense Jan 2014 #326
Looks like I hit a nerve. polichick Jan 2014 #327
LOL! Ooh ProSense Jan 2014 #328
I'm not complaining about "nasty attacks" - your talking points don't upset me... polichick Jan 2014 #329
I see, ProSense Jan 2014 #330
I agree that you consider both their and my observations to be... polichick Jan 2014 #331
Do you ProSense Jan 2014 #332
Answered in #325 (regarding #298): polichick Jan 2014 #334
That's . ProSense Jan 2014 #341
Answered already - no, obviously. Why would I be afraid? polichick Jan 2014 #342
Good, you support nasty attacks that are against DU rule. ProSense Jan 2014 #345
Just because you call something a "nasty attack" doesn't make it one. polichick Jan 2014 #346
Do you disagree ProSense Jan 2014 #352
I disagree with you that it was a "nasty attack"... polichick Jan 2014 #355
You ProSense Jan 2014 #356
I don't feel "angry" or "pissed." Just calling it like I see it. polichick Jan 2014 #357
What do you see? Can you point to and provide actual evidence of what you "see"? ProSense Jan 2014 #358
You seem to be projecting. If you're interested in what I see... polichick Jan 2014 #360
That doesn't make sense. You're the one accusing people of being "paid shills/sock puppets" ProSense Jan 2014 #362
Where did I do that? polichick Jan 2014 #363
You know, it's becoming clear that you're deliberately not making sense. ProSense Jan 2014 #367
Can't find the quote? polichick Jan 2014 #368
Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #369
You'll have to do better than that. In #362 you said... polichick Jan 2014 #371
Hey, I'm "just calling it like I see it." ProSense Jan 2014 #373
I don't deny anything I said - I deny there's a quote that backs up your reading... polichick Jan 2014 #374
You're ProSense Jan 2014 #377
I stand by every post I made. Problem is they don't add up... polichick Jan 2014 #379
Let me ProSense Jan 2014 #380
Hint: In #362 you asserted that I am accusing people of polichick Jan 2014 #382
Why ProSense Jan 2014 #384
Are you afraid to own up to your projection? A simple apology will do. polichick Jan 2014 #385
Yup, ProSense Jan 2014 #387
Nice apology! polichick Jan 2014 #388
Must be a gang mentality thing Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #333
To me it looks like #298 was trying to call out "the gang." polichick Jan 2014 #335
Uhuh Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #337
Nice try. polichick Jan 2014 #338
Right Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #339
What are you talking about? polichick Jan 2014 #340
Seriously? Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #343
My response made sense. You could try that. polichick Jan 2014 #344
Uhuh. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #348
Still not making sense - what are you suggesting? Put it in words... polichick Jan 2014 #350
I did. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #351
And I said that #298 seemed to be calling out "the gangs"... polichick Jan 2014 #354
Playing dumb Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #359
It might help if you actually said anything or asked anything... polichick Jan 2014 #361
No, dear.... Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #370
Finally, enough words to say what you mean... polichick Jan 2014 #372
To the bitter end.... Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #376
Where's my "gang?" Perhaps you are projecting your gang... polichick Jan 2014 #378
Yeah Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #383
Still can't come up with that awful gang? polichick Jan 2014 #386
. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #389
Silliness doesn't get you off the hook. Gang names please. polichick Jan 2014 #390
Obtuse to the bitter end. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #393
I'm not the one dangling. You make an accusation - back it up... polichick Jan 2014 #394
Great post! OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #309
The 1% decide EVERYTHING. nt valerief Jan 2014 #241
Unbelievable. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #263
Oh, ProSense Jan 2014 #264
No, you have an extremely high level of gall NuclearDem Jan 2014 #266
Actually, ProSense Jan 2014 #270
This thread went just splendidly donchaknow! Rex Jan 2014 #272
You can't seem to get enough of it. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #275
Yeah I know, I should stop posting in this epic failure. Rex Jan 2014 #347
Meh. 29 DUers agree with her. SMC22307 Jan 2014 #273
You know what's really funny? Marr Jan 2014 #298
Wow, ProSense Jan 2014 #316
Hmm, I hadn't thought of that. SMC22307 Jan 2014 #397
None. Puglover Jan 2014 #313
Yup, little ole irrelevant me. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #317
I do envy you however Puglover Jan 2014 #319
"Obama comes along, and is working to try to put the pieces back together" polichick Jan 2014 #277
It's ProSense Jan 2014 #282
And yet Elizabeth Warren wasn't made head of the bureau... polichick Jan 2014 #285
She ProSense Jan 2014 #287
And yet, as I said, she wasn't made head of it... polichick Jan 2014 #288
Here: ProSense Jan 2014 #289
The clip says Geithner and Obama fought for the agency... polichick Jan 2014 #290
The Hatch Act would have been violated. Can't you imagine the Issa hearing? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #391
OCPD... Obsessive–compulsive political disorder DCBob Jan 2014 #278
I don't know what "they" need. Puglover Jan 2014 #318
Ah, weekend prosense Union Scribe Jan 2014 #283
It seems ProSense Jan 2014 #284
Can't make the TPP smell like anything but shit, so try to marginalize and minimize it. djean111 Jan 2014 #295
Wait ProSense Jan 2014 #299
Exactly!!!!! To each his own! djean111 Jan 2014 #301
That ProSense Jan 2014 #303
Pardon me - more IMPORTANT is what I meant. djean111 Jan 2014 #306
No, it's ProSense Jan 2014 #308
Goodness, can't imagine thinking that at all! djean111 Jan 2014 #311
Good comment. Here ProSense Jan 2014 #315
Right on! Tired of the fratricide going on with Dems Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #364
Funny your OP here shows you doing just what you proclaim to hate Rex Jan 2014 #375
That's not even remotely true Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #392
I deem them, and the drone wars, the most important issues. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #396
Ending the costly trade agreements (&TPP) is essential to income equality. grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #399
Some poster by the name of ProSense did, back in 2006: friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #400
Awesome find. You win this thread, which is now an epic fail. Electric Monk Jan 2014 #404
I just can't get enough of that post. neverforget Jan 2014 #405
BTW, there's more than one Squealer on this thread friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #407
The cognitive dissonance is staggering! neverforget Jan 2014 #408
I sure you can't. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #410
Looks like *someone* wishes there really was a Memory Hole... friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #411
Try reading comprehension, it's a good cure for BS mind reading. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #412
Why so grumpy?- after all, the chocolate ration just got increased! friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #415
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #416
When I ProSense Jan 2014 #409
agree..... madrchsod Jan 2014 #401
Here's ProSense Jan 2014 #406
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who determined that the N...»Reply #46
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.