General Discussion

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)

96. So does mine

Reply to ProSense (Reply #86)

Sat Jan 18, 2014, 02:24 AM

Jan 2014

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023469856

As just one of many examples

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

416 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who determined that the NSA and TPP are the most important issues? [View all] ProSense Jan 2014 OP

Is this a serious thread? YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #1

Yes, very serious. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #2

What happens with the TPP and the NSA are incredibly serious issues... YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #4

Yes, they're serious ProSense Jan 2014 #6

The American people have decided how important they are. That's how democracy works. sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #35

The OP is how "democracy works." I am one of the American people. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #54

Wrong. The corporate media has decided how important they are. No democracy was involved. baldguy Jan 2014 #131

It's difficult if not impossible to bestow obxhead Jan 2014 #279

People can disagree treestar Jan 2014 #148

I certainly agree about income inequality over NSA hfojvt Jan 2014 #180

Nice rant :) Egnever Jan 2014 #3

Thanks. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #11

Wall Street reform? PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #5

Please ProSense Jan 2014 #8

Do you deny that crimes took place on Wall Street? YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #10

What does that have to do with the point of the OP? ProSense Jan 2014 #13

This adminstration's notable lack of prosecutions on Wall Street.... YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #17

Has nothing to do with the point. Nothing. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #22

Yes it does because you listed it as one of the accomplishments BuelahWitch Jan 2014 #33

No, I didn't friggin list prosecution of crimes as "one of the accomplishments". ProSense Jan 2014 #42

The lack of prosecutions is important because it demonstrates that while Obama likes to talk JDPriestly Jan 2014 #62

No, "prosecutions" are not "important" to the point I made. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #82

The lack of prosecutions places in question Obama's sincerity on the economic inequality issue. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #115

Again ProSense Jan 2014 #118

bwahahahahaha. yikes. yikes. yikes. cali Jan 2014 #129

LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #144

IKR!?! Rex Jan 2014 #353

Yes! They are. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #280

No, it's not and no amount of text is going to make it relevant to the point. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #281

Because you can not successfully move forward PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #18

Simplistic BS, and that still has nothing to do with my point. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #21

It has everything to do with it. PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #24

No, it doesn't, and maybe you should reread the OP. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #25

Facepalm PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #30

Again, ProSense Jan 2014 #34

Prosense PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #36

There were plenty of legal grounds to prosecute some of the bankers based on old fashioned fraud JDPriestly Jan 2014 #66

Good grief with the proseuctions ProSense Jan 2014 #69

A heads up. There is a twitter hash tag... Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #114

Wow, that's some stupid shit. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #116

Kerrraaaazzzzeeee! Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #117

Someone did a phony alert on this- pretending you're calling the OP a Nazi!! bettyellen Jan 2014 #125

When you're losing an argument on the internet, go for the Godwin. baldguy Jan 2014 #133

You've got the wrong Nazi baldguy Jan 2014 #132

Goebbels was the Reich minister of propaganda n/t Fumesucker Jan 2014 #142

And Goering made the relevant comment. baldguy Jan 2014 #250

The package of regulations didn't deal with the most important cause of the corruption. sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #40

OK, you don't think it goes far enough. What does that have to do with the point? ProSense Jan 2014 #47

You are ignoring one very important thing that has so angered the American people wise politicians sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #65

What do crimes have to do with the point of the OP? ProSense Jan 2014 #75

Mortgage companies and banks committed fraud but the individuals who actually committed the JDPriestly Jan 2014 #56

There is still ProSense Jan 2014 #64

They're too busy with more important things.... YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #9

So why does he support the TPP? flying rabbit Jan 2014 #7

What does that have to do with my point? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #12

To save time I would direct you to the subthread that begins with post 31 flying rabbit Jan 2014 #143

TPP is unrelated to the plight of the middle class income disparity? Bonobo Jan 2014 #14

Did I say that? No, I fucking didn't. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #15

Good to see we agree. nt Bonobo Jan 2014 #28

Bingo. One month before ACA goes live we get Eddie, Glenn, and Senator KY ucrdem Jan 2014 #16

Because the Fourth Amendment is a precious right. It is a matter of safeguarding the Constitution. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #70

The many, many millions buying smartphones and going online don't seem terribly worried ucrdem Jan 2014 #81

"their precious right to privacy" Hissyspit Jan 2014 #119

It's all cool until a Republican wins the Presidency and then neverforget Jan 2014 #165

Single Issue advocates.... stevil Jan 2014 #19

Dismsising a whole slew of great progressive activists as "single issue advocates"? YoungDemCA Jan 2014 #20

Like Julian Assange, the RW Libertarian? And Snowden, the Rand Paul acolyte? ucrdem Jan 2014 #26

What you are doing is dismissing the millions of Democrats who opposed these policies from the sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #44

Sabrina... Snowden, Glenn and Randy do not represent millions of Democrats. ucrdem Jan 2014 #63

This NSA is populated with Bush appointees and loyalists. Why? Why were they not all fired? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #76

McChrystal and Petraeus were also Bush holdovers Obama reappointed. ucrdem Jan 2014 #93

'Snowden and Greenwald didn't expose any' I guess that's why Obama was surprised by what he learned sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #130

"any statutory or ethical violations that would merit disciplinary action," and no, ucrdem Jan 2014 #135

So we were lied to again when we were told that Obama was surprised when he heard they had spied sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #138

You didn't give a link, date, name, quote, or title so all I can surmise ucrdem Jan 2014 #140

Same old bullshit, hunh? Hissyspit Jan 2014 #120

This message was self-deleted by its author stevil Jan 2014 #27

Who stopped fighting back? neverforget Jan 2014 #23

Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #29

Lol okay. How you get to there from that is neverforget Jan 2014 #32

.. Egnever Jan 2014 #48

Personally, I think that economic inequality is the biggest issue of our time. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #72

Because lip service about the minimum wage while pushing the TPP NuclearDem Jan 2014 #98

What ProSense Jan 2014 #101

"Free Trade" has done so much to screw up the economy since the 1990's. That it IS a core issue Armstead Jan 2014 #31

Again, ProSense Jan 2014 #37

"You illustrated my point perfectly." bobduca Jan 2014 #41

God no kidding. nt Puglover Jan 2014 #159

TPP is a continuation of previous "free trade policies" whose results are already known. Armstead Jan 2014 #43

"And we're trying to prevent it from becoming law." ProSense Jan 2014 #52

You are doing your usual nitpicking Armstead Jan 2014 #60

"Perhaps it is not THE most important issue." ProSense Jan 2014 #67

As far as I'm concerned you (anyone) can focus on any damn issue they want Armstead Jan 2014 #77

That's ProSense Jan 2014 #83

I dion't see much of that going on, but feel free to fret about it if you want Armstead Jan 2014 #92

It happens a lot. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #95

So this is whining about how others rank the importance of issues? Why should it matter Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #167

No, it's not. ProSense Jan 2014 #170

Big Ed had seven Democratic congress members come on his show today think Jan 2014 #71

It will be if people ignore it. Which is the answer to your question. Why is it so important now? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #55

Great post, so thanks Sabrina 1. n/t truedelphi Jan 2014 #134

No, ProSense Jan 2014 #145

But Obama is sponsoring TPP. That's why we don't totally believe his sincerity about dealing JDPriestly Jan 2014 #74

So? That's on you...what you choose to believe. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #79

It's about things not adding up - but of course, you know that. polichick Jan 2014 #292

"TPP isn't a fucking law yet"????? OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #294

Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #297

Yes. See post #37 OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #300

Where does ProSense Jan 2014 #302

Yes, that is what it implies. OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #310

No, it doesn't. ProSense Jan 2014 #312

Zzzzzzzzzz OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #314

Tax cuts for the rich, corporate deregulation, 'right-to-work laws', slashing the safety net pampango Jan 2014 #136

How does the TPP affect any one of those things? treestar Jan 2014 #149

You thought the Bush economy was fine? JAYSUS! No wonder folks are world's apart on economics TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #189

Please explain exactly how NAFTA caused it all treestar Jan 2014 #190

What can't be traced to free trade? laundry_queen Jan 2014 #191

No, it's those who claim NAFTA caused consequences treestar Jan 2014 #203

NAFTA included provisionbs that made it eassier and more attractive to remove econoimic sovergnty Armstead Jan 2014 #205

Where have we been unable to set standards for our goods and services? treestar Jan 2014 #207

Try reading the services, financial serv and ag chapters of NAFTA, the WTO, or OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #307

Nice deflection laundry_queen Jan 2014 #206

NAFTA has been accused of causing all sorts of ills treestar Jan 2014 #209

Well, I understand economic issues laundry_queen Jan 2014 #242

How would the TPP make outsourcing even easier? treestar Jan 2014 #262

The percentage of middle class people that benefit enough from the stock market to make a difference laundry_queen Jan 2014 #268

Everyone I know in the middle class has 401ks etc. treestar Jan 2014 #274

1) To countries offering the lowest wages and most lax environmental regulations... SMC22307 Jan 2014 #271

That would happen anyway treestar Jan 2014 #276

The overall results of NAFTA on the working class are negative in both the US and Mexico. ronnie624 Jan 2014 #366

How do we know that? treestar Jan 2014 #381

Your post suggests ronnie624 Jan 2014 #398

uncalled for conclusions about me treestar Jan 2014 #402

I said it was "as if". ronnie624 Jan 2014 #403

The only solution is some type of isolationism? OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #305

You said the economy was fine, I did not say that NAFTA was the sole cause TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #395

Opposition to TPP needs to be mobilized now. moondust Jan 2014 #38

Some dude even gave a boring speech about the NSA today. think Jan 2014 #39

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #45

This is the most sadly amusing post I've seen all day Armstead Jan 2014 #50

Yup...... think Jan 2014 #51

Thankfully MIRT'd before he could start any flames bobduca Jan 2014 #58

Wow welcome to DU Egnever Jan 2014 #73

The TPP is a big obstacle to better wages for working people and for lifting up the middle class. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #46

Potentially, ProSense Jan 2014 #53

The most important issue is free and fair voting. If the corps control our votes, all other issues rhett o rick Jan 2014 #49

Even on this ProSense Jan 2014 #88

Wow that's a lot of schutf and links. But none will matter if our votes go thru rhett o rick Jan 2014 #246

If none of it mattered ProSense Jan 2014 #252

My point is you can register millions and fix gerrymandering rhett o rick Jan 2014 #265

Answer: anyone who is even a casual student of history. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #57

How about you let each DUer decide for themselves what the most important issues kelly1mm Jan 2014 #59

The President did, by giving a speech today about the window dressing you are calling reform bobduca Jan 2014 #61

You decided NSA was important. Not long ago, you were posting almost Hourly Anti-Snowden, Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #68

No, I didn't. I can post about a number of things often and in a timely manner. ProSense Jan 2014 #78

Lol! Revise history much? Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #84

"often and in a timely manner" n/t bobduca Jan 2014 #85

My point stands. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #86

So does mine Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #96

Posting a statement published in WaPo is an "NSA screed"? ProSense Jan 2014 #97

True, not screed this particular one. Just Pro NSA propaganda Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #99

Thanks for acknowledging that the point was false. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #102

That one particular post. You sometimes posted screeds. But it was mostly Pro NSA propaganda Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #106

Nonsense. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #108

Lol!! Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #122

I've come to believe that when that account posts the word "nonsense"... Marr Jan 2014 #231

"I can post about a number of things often and in a timely manner." Hissyspit Jan 2014 #123

"So can other people." ProSense Jan 2014 #146

Do an advanced search for the threads you started between June 6 and July 3 in GD muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #141

Ridiculous ProSense Jan 2014 #160

So are you saying we shouldn't pay any attention to your threads, because you babble muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #161

What the hell are you talking about? Suggestion ProSense Jan 2014 #162

You say 'Volume doesn't equal "most important."'; so I ask you what does equal "most important" muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #163

Good grief ProSense Jan 2014 #164

You still aren't saying how we're meant to know what you think is important muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #166

You're ProSense Jan 2014 #168

So you can't justify starting about 5 NSA threads per day for a month, and then complaining muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #169

What the hell does "starting" threads about the NSA have to do with my point? ProSense Jan 2014 #171

No, it's when you start 150 of them in a month, a clear majority of the threads you started muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #177

Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #181

Your verbal gymnastics are energetic LondonReign2 Jan 2014 #172

LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #174

I know, right? LondonReign2 Jan 2014 #179

Again, ProSense Jan 2014 #182

Au contraire LondonReign2 Jan 2014 #183

Here's the deal ProSense Jan 2014 #184

Then every last one of us missed the point. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #413

Not true, but I can see why you'd want to believe that. ProSense Jan 2014 #414

I do have to say, Prosense has always been on top of the NSA. Way back to 2006 Autumn Jan 2014 #249

Yes, ProSense Jan 2014 #293

Nailed it! whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #216

+1 Marr Jan 2014 #229

Our Planet is ultimately the most important issue.. Cha Jan 2014 #80

Agreed the planet is the most important issue. Egnever Jan 2014 #87

.. Cha Jan 2014 #91

Today, Nebraska filed a lawsuit ProSense Jan 2014 #94

President Obama keeps trying to help our Environment without a Cha Jan 2014 #105

As long as it's up here. Just, wow... Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #89

Lame. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #90

Who decided? Well, apparently, a whole bunch of people. Maedhros Jan 2014 #100

He gives a lot of speeches ProSense Jan 2014 #104

Here in Calif., those of us in the know understand that truedelphi Jan 2014 #137

And Jerry Brown created a surplus. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #152

Do you know how he created that surplus? By cutting social programs, by cutting truedelphi Jan 2014 #267

Why do we shoot spies, but only imprison uniformed enemy? MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #103

What ProSense Jan 2014 #107

Sneakiness magnifies these things in the minds of many. MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #110

Fine, that's on you. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #111

you don't think the TPP will impact inequality and the middle class? why do I hear "Aegukka"? MisterP Jan 2014 #109

Nothing in my comments imply that, and I can help with your hearing. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #112

The most important issues? Really? Spider Jerusalem Jan 2014 #113

^^ This ^^ Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #251

This message was self-deleted by its author Hissyspit Jan 2014 #121

The middle class is dying, yes. davidthegnome Jan 2014 #124

some force or group within government or the MIC that ... gives marching orders Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #248

Well, it's killing the working class, which is about 60 or 70% of the country. Deep13 Jan 2014 #126

Bravo. SoapBox Jan 2014 #127

gad. the everlasting gob stopper defense of Obama no matter what. cali Jan 2014 #128

Another ProSense Jan 2014 #150

I agree with you completely... giftedgirl77 Jan 2014 #192

On DU you know the names and they're good at milking the same issues. great white snark Jan 2014 #139

There is only ONE Democrat on record supporting the TPP. Max Baucus think Jan 2014 #156

The NSA is a tempest in a teapot treestar Jan 2014 #147

On another message board, we called what the OP is doing a "Clown Dance"... Romulox Jan 2014 #151

Freerepublic? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #153

The only "ex" freeper we have here on DU agrees with you 98% of the time. Ooops! Romulox Jan 2014 #154

The operative being "ex," huh? ProSense Jan 2014 #155

No. The operative word is "freeper". Rightwing bullshit with a (D) after it remains rightwing Romulox Jan 2014 #157

Obviously, you're an expert ProSense Jan 2014 #158

... MineralMan Jan 2014 #188

Nailed it. HEY EVERYBODY LOOK AT THIS POSITIVE THREAD NOT THOSE OTHER ONES bobduca Jan 2014 #195

+ My household. n/t truedelphi Jan 2014 #269

If ridiculousness is the point, what's the purpose? polichick Jan 2014 #291

151 House Dems Telling President They Will Not Support Outdated Fast Track for TPP Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #173

? ProSense Jan 2014 #176

Incoherent and nonresponsive as usual Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #185

Maybe you can explain what the hell a letter to the President has to do with the OP? ProSense Jan 2014 #187

Maybe if we shout the answers at you they will get through to you? bobduca Jan 2014 #194

No, ProSense Jan 2014 #196

so you deny asking who determined that these issues are most important/ bobduca Jan 2014 #197

LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #198

Post removed Post removed Jan 2014 #199

Clearly you don't, but you think you do. ProSense Jan 2014 #200

No clearly you need to think that or you wouldnt seem so condescending in every post bobduca Jan 2014 #201

That's called ProSense Jan 2014 #202

hey now we're into pro-sense response bingo bobduca Jan 2014 #204

Do you ever post anything that makes sense? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #208

my posts make plenty of sense bobduca Jan 2014 #210

LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #212

QED bobduca Jan 2014 #213

See what a waste of time that was? Rex Jan 2014 #218

yep bobduca Jan 2014 #226

. Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #254

Obviously, it wasn't ProSense Jan 2014 #365

While I can respect your position, BelgianMadCow Jan 2014 #175

My "framing is outdated"? ProSense Jan 2014 #178

I don't think any one person determined it but... hollowdweller Jan 2014 #186

I went ahead and decided that our surveillance state is pretty goddamned important. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #193

Ok, TPP has nothing to do with income inequality. DireStrike Jan 2014 #211

Wow, you offered your own theory and agreed with it ProSense Jan 2014 #214

I am looking for a job DireStrike Jan 2014 #239

Wait, ProSense Jan 2014 #240

LET THE SPIN BEGIN! whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #215

Couldn't come up with anything better? ProSense Jan 2014 #217

Didn't need to whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #219

Really? ProSense Jan 2014 #222

Well you spend every waking hour posting in this forum whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #228

Wow, ProSense Jan 2014 #232

DU Oxygen... rough estimate is 1 in 10 active posts...like owning the yellow and green properties... Octafish Jan 2014 #336

I like how this thread did not go any way, shape or form as attended. Rex Jan 2014 #220

Yep whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #223

We can dance if we want to! Rex Jan 2014 #224

"This thread" went exactly the way it was anticipated, including ProSense Jan 2014 #225

Nope went to shit and you cannot admit to it, it would cause you to admit to fault. Rex Jan 2014 #227

No it went to debate. ProSense Jan 2014 #234

Like I said, you lack the ability to find fault in yourself Rex Jan 2014 #260

Oh brother ProSense Jan 2014 #261

Debate? You're just angrily snarling at everyone. nt Union Scribe Jan 2014 #286

Maybe that's ProSense Jan 2014 #304

Let him pretend in his fantasy world that this thread went like he wanted it to. Rex Jan 2014 #349

I think they are very important issues. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #221

Good for you. What ProSense Jan 2014 #230

The NSA spying is one of the most important issues to me. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #233

That's fine. You seem ProSense Jan 2014 #236

I suppose you could ask your supervisor. Marr Jan 2014 #235

Yikes! ProSense Jan 2014 #237

What are you implying, Marr? MineralMan Jan 2014 #238

Marr please edit whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #243

I don't know ProSense Jan 2014 #245

Yes, excoriating the guy responsible for the reforms you now praise whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #247

Lots of fun, but evidently you're upset because ProSense Jan 2014 #253

Sad whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #255

Sorry to hear that. ProSense Jan 2014 #256

Well since you seem to know everything whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #257

I didn't claim to "know everything." n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #258

Can't say I expected an answer whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #259

Wow. demmiblue Jan 2014 #244

Valid suggestion in light of the posting pattern. polichick Jan 2014 #296

It seems idiotic to me. I mean, ProSense Jan 2014 #320

Is it "nasty" if it's true? As you know... polichick Jan 2014 #321

It's nasty because ProSense Jan 2014 #322

Could be true about anyone - but the payer would... polichick Jan 2014 #323

Yes, ProSense Jan 2014 #324

Look (as BO always says), I enjoy your posts - but the truth is... polichick Jan 2014 #325

Oh, ProSense Jan 2014 #326

Looks like I hit a nerve. polichick Jan 2014 #327

LOL! Ooh ProSense Jan 2014 #328

I'm not complaining about "nasty attacks" - your talking points don't upset me... polichick Jan 2014 #329

I see, ProSense Jan 2014 #330

I agree that you consider both their and my observations to be... polichick Jan 2014 #331

Do you ProSense Jan 2014 #332

Answered in #325 (regarding #298): polichick Jan 2014 #334

That's . ProSense Jan 2014 #341

Answered already - no, obviously. Why would I be afraid? polichick Jan 2014 #342

Good, you support nasty attacks that are against DU rule. ProSense Jan 2014 #345

Just because you call something a "nasty attack" doesn't make it one. polichick Jan 2014 #346

Do you disagree ProSense Jan 2014 #352

I disagree with you that it was a "nasty attack"... polichick Jan 2014 #355

You ProSense Jan 2014 #356

I don't feel "angry" or "pissed." Just calling it like I see it. polichick Jan 2014 #357

What do you see? Can you point to and provide actual evidence of what you "see"? ProSense Jan 2014 #358

You seem to be projecting. If you're interested in what I see... polichick Jan 2014 #360

That doesn't make sense. You're the one accusing people of being "paid shills/sock puppets" ProSense Jan 2014 #362

Where did I do that? polichick Jan 2014 #363

You know, it's becoming clear that you're deliberately not making sense. ProSense Jan 2014 #367

Can't find the quote? polichick Jan 2014 #368

Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #369

You'll have to do better than that. In #362 you said... polichick Jan 2014 #371

Hey, I'm "just calling it like I see it." ProSense Jan 2014 #373

I don't deny anything I said - I deny there's a quote that backs up your reading... polichick Jan 2014 #374

You're ProSense Jan 2014 #377

I stand by every post I made. Problem is they don't add up... polichick Jan 2014 #379

Let me ProSense Jan 2014 #380

Hint: In #362 you asserted that I am accusing people of polichick Jan 2014 #382

Why ProSense Jan 2014 #384

Are you afraid to own up to your projection? A simple apology will do. polichick Jan 2014 #385

Yup, ProSense Jan 2014 #387

Nice apology! polichick Jan 2014 #388

Must be a gang mentality thing Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #333

To me it looks like #298 was trying to call out "the gang." polichick Jan 2014 #335

Uhuh Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #337

Nice try. polichick Jan 2014 #338

Right Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #339

What are you talking about? polichick Jan 2014 #340

Seriously? Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #343

My response made sense. You could try that. polichick Jan 2014 #344

Uhuh. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #348

Still not making sense - what are you suggesting? Put it in words... polichick Jan 2014 #350

I did. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #351

And I said that #298 seemed to be calling out "the gangs"... polichick Jan 2014 #354

Playing dumb Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #359

It might help if you actually said anything or asked anything... polichick Jan 2014 #361

No, dear.... Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #370

Finally, enough words to say what you mean... polichick Jan 2014 #372

To the bitter end.... Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #376

Where's my "gang?" Perhaps you are projecting your gang... polichick Jan 2014 #378

Yeah Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #383

Still can't come up with that awful gang? polichick Jan 2014 #386

. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #389

Silliness doesn't get you off the hook. Gang names please. polichick Jan 2014 #390

Obtuse to the bitter end. Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #393

I'm not the one dangling. You make an accusation - back it up... polichick Jan 2014 #394

Great post! OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #309

The 1% decide EVERYTHING. nt valerief Jan 2014 #241

Unbelievable. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #263

Oh, ProSense Jan 2014 #264

No, you have an extremely high level of gall NuclearDem Jan 2014 #266

Actually, ProSense Jan 2014 #270

This thread went just splendidly donchaknow! Rex Jan 2014 #272

You can't seem to get enough of it. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #275

Yeah I know, I should stop posting in this epic failure. Rex Jan 2014 #347

Meh. 29 DUers agree with her. SMC22307 Jan 2014 #273

You know what's really funny? Marr Jan 2014 #298

Wow, ProSense Jan 2014 #316

Hmm, I hadn't thought of that. SMC22307 Jan 2014 #397

None. Puglover Jan 2014 #313

Yup, little ole irrelevant me. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #317

I do envy you however Puglover Jan 2014 #319

"Obama comes along, and is working to try to put the pieces back together" polichick Jan 2014 #277

It's ProSense Jan 2014 #282

And yet Elizabeth Warren wasn't made head of the bureau... polichick Jan 2014 #285

She ProSense Jan 2014 #287

And yet, as I said, she wasn't made head of it... polichick Jan 2014 #288

Here: ProSense Jan 2014 #289

The clip says Geithner and Obama fought for the agency... polichick Jan 2014 #290

The Hatch Act would have been violated. Can't you imagine the Issa hearing? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #391

OCPD... Obsessive–compulsive political disorder DCBob Jan 2014 #278

I don't know what "they" need. Puglover Jan 2014 #318

Ah, weekend prosense Union Scribe Jan 2014 #283

It seems ProSense Jan 2014 #284

Can't make the TPP smell like anything but shit, so try to marginalize and minimize it. djean111 Jan 2014 #295

Wait ProSense Jan 2014 #299

Exactly!!!!! To each his own! djean111 Jan 2014 #301

That ProSense Jan 2014 #303

Pardon me - more IMPORTANT is what I meant. djean111 Jan 2014 #306

No, it's ProSense Jan 2014 #308

Goodness, can't imagine thinking that at all! djean111 Jan 2014 #311

Good comment. Here ProSense Jan 2014 #315

Right on! Tired of the fratricide going on with Dems Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #364

Funny your OP here shows you doing just what you proclaim to hate Rex Jan 2014 #375

That's not even remotely true Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #392

I deem them, and the drone wars, the most important issues. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #396

Ending the costly trade agreements (&TPP) is essential to income equality. grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #399

Some poster by the name of ProSense did, back in 2006: friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #400

Awesome find. You win this thread, which is now an epic fail. Electric Monk Jan 2014 #404

I just can't get enough of that post. neverforget Jan 2014 #405

BTW, there's more than one Squealer on this thread friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #407

The cognitive dissonance is staggering! neverforget Jan 2014 #408

I sure you can't. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #410

Looks like *someone* wishes there really was a Memory Hole... friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #411

Try reading comprehension, it's a good cure for BS mind reading. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #412

Why so grumpy?- after all, the chocolate ration just got increased! friendly_iconoclast Jan 2014 #415

LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #416

When I ProSense Jan 2014 #409

agree..... madrchsod Jan 2014 #401

Here's ProSense Jan 2014 #406