Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: the people who defended the NSA most vociferously, are those [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)258. Worshiping at the alter of Consistency is a foolish game.
Everyone's viewpoints should be malleable when new information is presented. Otherwise, we are all robots.
Most of us who think Snowden is a fool agreed that reforms were needed. Now here they are and some DUers are still unhappy about it. It's an interesting view of society in a microcosm.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you don't give yourself the same benefit of a doubt you'd give anyone else, you're cheating someone.[/center][/font][hr]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
372 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We really need your hourly posts again. This time how well the Presidents doing to rein in the NSA
Katashi_itto
Jan 2014
#54
Are the rabies shot going to be your excuse for all of the personal attacks you've launched in this
Number23
Jan 2014
#206
I don't know what bit her. But she keeps posting about it so I'm sure it will be easy enough to find
Number23
Jan 2014
#341
Why did we need reforms of something we were told everyone knew for centuries and were no problem
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#228
Get rid of all the Republicans, which should have happened five years ago. That's why we elect
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#358
you would apply full criminal law standards for warrants to national security?
treestar
Jan 2014
#362
... Cables containing the guidance were sent in 2008 and 2009 ... "No one ever reads
struggle4progress
Jan 2014
#237
That's interesting. Airc, you have started threads of your own to call out DUers you disagreed with.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#232
Interesting that you joined in '08, but half your nasty posts have been in the last 90 days
Hekate
Jan 2014
#219
Sure, it is available for $69.99 from some contractor spin off, nothing they have is private, right
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#27
It's the spectacular nature of some of the twists of logic that make them so memorable
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#31
He can be a poor manager that doesn't have a clue what his agency is actually doing
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#38
Is he your uncle or something? I just don't get the fronting for a Republican liar.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2014
#57
You are absolutely correct. And if the president had said that he was not reining in the NSA
totodeinhere
Jan 2014
#36
You know what's so overused that it is dull and damaging? Refering to any criticism as hate.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#122
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2014
#53
i think people have a problem with those who support the PRes more than actually caring
JI7
Jan 2014
#199
"The crew will snap to and present arms if the USS Inevitable should make port on the Potomac."
SMC22307
Jan 2014
#317
And they also said NSA acted legally and the only way to fix it was elect a better Congress.
pa28
Jan 2014
#125
A lot of us spent time looking at right wing forums during Dick n' Dubya's Excellent Adventure
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#181
Hateful thread. I've never supported the NSA or the Patriot Act and I still think this thread
Number23
Jan 2014
#187
The insults and personal attacks outnumber the recs considerably. And it ain't the president's
Number23
Jan 2014
#225
I've not defended the NSA ONCE. But this is EXACTLY the type of lying garbage that you are
Number23
Jan 2014
#351
Even the jury has seen through what you're trying to do. We'll see what Skinner says next
Number23
Jan 2014
#355
Doesn't everyone have an ignore feature? Lol. I was given the same order, so were others.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#360
You're wasting your time. I see the same old 'leave me alone' and 'you're stalking me' routine.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#359
It's so cute to see 3 of the FOUR people that I've repeatedly asked to put me on ignore
Number23
Jan 2014
#366
I asked you to put me on ignore, please do so. That is all I have to say to you.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#367
You've never asked me to and I've never needed to. You don't say anthing I find interesting
Number23
Jan 2014
#368
Please do not address me again. I asked you to use your ignore feature years ago.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#369
But weren't you the one braying upthread about how sooooo terribly weird it was
Number23
Jan 2014
#370
I thought it was all about "protecting the 4th" and didn't matter that the perps are RWNJs?
ucrdem
Jan 2014
#210
Now I understand the reason for that nonsense, word salad thread. Thanks. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2014
#224
Most of the people I've heard praising the NSA are terrified of spiders too.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2014
#229
A well thought out opinion with nuance that blistering critics from both parties can ignore.....
marble falls
Jan 2014
#252
I think the attitude of the people you are criticising is simply this is not a hair-on-fire issue.
DCBob
Jan 2014
#261
Nope. I defended the administration and there are no significant changes now. Just as I said
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#269
K&R for exposing the dishonesty and absurdity of the propaganda. nt
woo me with science
Jan 2014
#272