Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 12:06 PM Jan 2014

I've always been a single-payer advocate but I must admit... [View all]

...I had been lulled into complacency somewhat with the ACA.

The harsh ACA reality here in California is that insurance companies have combined extremely narrow and limited networks along with pitiful doctor choices for a toxic mix of substandard coverage.

People will be forced to seek care outside their networks to get adequate and in some cases the specialized care they will need to survive.

There will still be bankruptcies due to health care costs. Those with coverage are still going to see their rates rise to cover those who can't afford their care.

The ACA is a band-aid over a gaping wound.
We need a public health care system in the USA NOW more then ever!

--

Blue Shield will offer only limited network Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) and Exclusive Provider Organization(EPO)plans to all new individual buyers. All new customers who have been anticipating purchasing guaranteed issue individual insurance for themselves and their families, will have access to a network that excludes 65% of current Blue Shield doctors and all the University of California Medical Centers.

Network access will be determined by county of residence. In Marin and Alameda counties, for example, Blue Shield plans to use an Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO). Buyers will find their access to medical services restricted to the doctors and medical facilities within the EPO in their county or an EPO doctor in another county. If the policyholder crosses the Golden Gate Bridge or Bay Bridge to consult with a San Francisco PPO doctor, s/he will have no insurance. If a San Francisco resident moves to Alameda, s/he will not be able to keep her San Francisco doctors.

It appears that carriers are also able to exclude residents of specific zip codes from access to their insurance plans. If one carrier can exclude residents in certain zip codes, what is the rationale to require other carriers to cover residents in that same zip code? The ACA requires insurers to accept all applicants regardless of health conditions. But California is allowing exclusion by residence location.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-shargel/protect-californians-choi_b_4158146.html


35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neighborhood blacklisting? What could possibly go wrong!? nt Adrahil Jan 2014 #1
Which begs the question: SHRED Jan 2014 #8
And another... SHRED Jan 2014 #10
This is a genuine issue Yo_Mama Jan 2014 #16
Medicare for All is the solution, and Democratic candidates should be campaigning on that. Loudly Jan 2014 #2
There is a simple solution within the ACA. Two states already pnwmom Jan 2014 #3
Problem is, many of the providers are choosing not to participate. As usual, they want more money. Hoyt Jan 2014 #6
And Doctors also are refusing SHRED Jan 2014 #12
Exactly, askbthem why they are being greedy at expense of patients. Hoyt Jan 2014 #14
I wasn't. LWolf Jan 2014 #4
I've never seen ACA as the end game, but have been extremely grateful Skidmore Jan 2014 #5
+100000. We had to get through obstructors that defeated Hilliarycare and tried to defeat O'care. Hoyt Jan 2014 #7
Yeh, I see the ACA as a step toward eliminating private health insurance companies from the face Zorra Jan 2014 #9
How will it do that? SHRED Jan 2014 #11
You already answered that question. Zorra Jan 2014 #13
Or... SHRED Jan 2014 #15
bump... nt Jesus Malverde Jan 2014 #17
Two huge ACA reforms are needed: dawg Jan 2014 #18
yep! SHRED Jan 2014 #19
Sorry, but there are providers who don't make the quality or cost cut. Hoyt Jan 2014 #20
I don't think you understand me. dawg Jan 2014 #21
Unfortunately even with Medicare doctors are not required to accept Medicare lostincalifornia Jan 2014 #34
K&R That complacency one of its primary goals. Nothing about our health care system is designed Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #22
I will continue to advocate for Medicare for All, including dental, optical and hearing aids. Scuba Jan 2014 #23
We've mentioned these before, as I recall. Shandris Jan 2014 #32
Excellent points, thanks for posting. Scuba Jan 2014 #35
Perhaps one day we can figure a way to *trick* these amoral corporate behemoths to do our bidding. Romulox Jan 2014 #24
The ACA leads to universal care the way Free Trade leads to more jobs. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #25
I wonder if the ACA has save anyone's life yet. gulliver Jan 2014 #26
Then there's that stupid family glitch that makes low income families ineligible for subsidies. MrsKirkley Jan 2014 #27
I have all of the same doctors etc but better coverage.... Walk away Jan 2014 #28
This is a post of Oct 2013, by an insurance executive. lostincalifornia Jan 2014 #30
wow, what a surprise, an article by Susan Shargel, President, Shargel & Co Insurance Services. Hmmm lostincalifornia Jan 2014 #29
Have you checked into the coverage? SHRED Jan 2014 #31
Stanford, ucsf, Palo Alto medical foundation, ucla, all of those facilities accept the ACA lostincalifornia Jan 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've always been a single...