Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spin

(17,493 posts)
67. The question is if these restrictions will be enforced. ...
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 05:43 PM
Jan 2014

Years ago I worked for a company that made items for the government. This company had a good number of such contracts. Each had a "charge number" that you used when you worked on that program.

Some contracts were overrunning their budget and some were not. If your program was one of those which was overrunning, it was quite likely that the supervision would instruct you to charge your labor to a different contract that that was doing well. As an employee, you had no choice or you would be shown the door.

This offered my company a significant advantage in competition with much smaller government contractors who may have had only one or two contracts. We could easily underbid them and drive them out of business.

One day the government woke up to this fact and decided to correct it. The solution to this mischarging mess was simply to announce that if caught any supervisor who approved this mischarging could end up in prison and so could the VP who ran the entire show.

It was simply amazing how much things charged at work. The company suddenly decided to take mischarging seriously.

Obama can put all the words he wants on paper to protect our freedom but unless he is willing to ENFORCE these new rules, they will make little or no difference in the long run.

Time will tell if Obama is serious or not. Even if he is, it is quite possible that another future President may decide to not prosecute those who violate the privacy rights of our citizens.

I'm not sure that we will, or even can, protect the rights we were granted in the Bill of Rights in a world with the technology we have today.

I am also not sure that Obama and those we elect to Congress are actually running this nation right now. Perhaps a small cadre of people who work for the ultrasecret alphabet agencies and have access to all the mega-data are hiding behind a curtain and pulling strings that control our politicians. They would know all the personal secrets of everybody we elect and also where all the bodies are buried and could use that knowledge to pull the strings that control our elected representatives.

Now perhaps you will feel that I wear a tinfoil hat, but I will simply point out that J. Edgar Hoover was know as "the most powerful man in Washington" and the Congress and a good number of Presidents were unwilling to take him on as he knew all their secrets.

J. Edgar Hoover

John Edgar Hoover (January 1, 1895 – May 2, 1972) was the first Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the United States. Appointed director of the Bureau of Investigation—predecessor to the FBI—in 1924, he was instrumental in founding the FBI in 1935, where he remained director until his death in 1972 at age 77. Hoover is credited with building the FBI into a larger crime-fighting agency, and with instituting a number of modernizations to police technology, such as a centralized fingerprint file and forensic laboratories.

Late in life and after his death Hoover became a controversial figure, as evidence of his secretive actions became known. His critics have accused him of exceeding the jurisdiction of the FBI.[1] He used the FBI to harass political dissenters and activists, to amass secret files on political leaders,[2] and to collect evidence using illegal methods.[3] Hoover consequently amassed a great deal of power and was in a position to intimidate and threaten sitting Presidents.[4]

According to President Harry S. Truman, Hoover transformed the FBI into his private secret police force; Truman stated that "we want no Gestapo or secret police. FBI is tending in that direction. They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail. J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to take over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him".[5]...emphasis added
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Edgar_Hoover


Imagine how powerful J. Edgar Hoover would be today if he had access to the mega-data the NSA and other agencies are collecting.






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

lipstick on the pig isn't enough nt grasswire Jan 2014 #1
How many ACLU hoops must the President jump through? They would end the NSA outright, Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #2
+1 n/t FSogol Jan 2014 #3
And then be the first to complain that the government didn't do enough to protect our kelliekat44 Jan 2014 #8
This exact quote could have been seen PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #11
What does the government do to protect our natural resources, energy grid, bank accounts, JDPriestly Jan 2014 #39
Good grief. The ACLU is one of the few organizations out there Mojorabbit Jan 2014 #10
Really... and on a "progressive" website, to boot.... hlthe2b Jan 2014 #19
I'm a Democrat, not a CATO Institute lovin' Civil Libertarian. Fuck Libertarians! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #24
I'm a progressive Democrat-- not an authoritarian --and one who cares about civil liberties hlthe2b Jan 2014 #25
Your "advice" is duly noted. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #27
I agree with you Progressive dog Jan 2014 #29
There are none, except those who play one "on the internet". Like Thom Hartmann says: Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #31
...Or are doing illegal drugs. eom Jamaal510 Jan 2014 #62
Exactly. They are Republicans at heart. n/t Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #70
Fuck authoritarian Republicans! Broward Jan 2014 #55
And "Fuck" libertarian Republicans as well! Fuck Republicans period! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #58
I frankly don't give a s**t what "you believe". We also have "a right" not to be blown up. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #23
Can you link to that part of the Constitution. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #33
Well hello Luminous(Fire)Animal(Dog)! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #34
¿Que? Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #51
No offense, but I never click on your links. But thanks anyhoo! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #57
No offense taken. I love you Tarheel_Dem. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #60
FEARMONGERING bobduca Jan 2014 #54
Don't be surprised. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #42
Fuck Comrade Snowden! May he live out his life in Putin's Russia. Couldn't happen to a nicer asshole Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #59
All the hoops required to restore constitutional normalcy. nt. Warren Stupidity Jan 2014 #15
And he listened treestar Jan 2014 #26
Exactly. There's no pleasing them no matter what he does. It's ODS at it's absolute worst. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #28
Oh yeah, and they're coming out of the damn woodwork.. Cha Jan 2014 #64
Oh, they've never gone away. They infest this board like a plague. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #69
Yeah, they're fucking gross.. got their "correct" talking points down.. Cha Jan 2014 #71
The weak minded idiot in the pink "bonnet" is proof positive they're here. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #72
Smooch smooch Stoooopid! Cha Jan 2014 #73
Poor, delicate, Obama, has to jump through civil liberties hoops. Tsk. Tsk. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #66
What's with all the extraneous commas? Education is fundamental. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #68
Thanks for the post and cross posts for follow up on the NSA issues. (nt) pinto Jan 2014 #4
This is a great chart. Thanks for posting nt riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #5
You're welcome. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #6
Talk is cheap. PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #7
Yeah, but ProSense Jan 2014 #9
I will give him props PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #12
You've all given that smiley such a bad rep. Union Scribe Jan 2014 #18
I like ProSense Jan 2014 #21
It's not laughter its just derisive scorn, one of your most time-worn tools bobduca Jan 2014 #43
No, ProSense Jan 2014 #44
I don't believe you. bobduca Jan 2014 #46
I don't care ProSense Jan 2014 #47
Cue canned laughter bobduca Jan 2014 #48
. ProSense Jan 2014 #50
His reforms are not sufficient. That is the problem. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #52
"The president’s own review panel recommended that bulk data collection be ended hlthe2b Jan 2014 #13
The ACLU just has ODS mindwalker_i Jan 2014 #14
The President takes the heat for 60 years of NSA spying... kelliekat44 Jan 2014 #16
This is a big issue too imo PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #17
+1 Jamaal510 Jan 2014 #30
+1 Blue_Tires Jan 2014 #32
You made coffee come out of my nose!!! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #35
Yep. 60 years of NSA spying and...the black guy is the fall guy Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #49
And we have a Democratic President to make the changes to make abuse less likely. neverforget Jan 2014 #61
Thanks Prosense. Cha Jan 2014 #20
You're welcome. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #22
Excerpt from ACLU email this afternoon. In the interest of fairness. Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #36
That's reflected in the chart. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #37
K&R. Thank you kindly. great white snark Jan 2014 #38
Thanks. ProSense Jan 2014 #40
I don't know why he does not do more to end this, it is a curious thing to me. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2014 #41
Good speech, good first start. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #45
Kick n Rec! sheshe2 Jan 2014 #53
Here is the speech: Coyotl Jan 2014 #56
NSA Critic Ron Wyden Commends 'Milestone' In Surveillance Reform.. Cha Jan 2014 #63
Yes, and if you ProSense Jan 2014 #75
As long as it's up here, you need a much bigger trowel if you're going to cover up this pig. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #65
The question is if these restrictions will be enforced. ... spin Jan 2014 #67
Thoughtful post. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2014 #76
After building that massive data collection facility, we're just going to leave it sitting empty? Shandris Jan 2014 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ACLU Comment on President...»Reply #67