General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

5. It just wrong. They've had years to ensure that exactly this kind of inequity NOT be extant.

Reply to OKNancy (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 19, 2014, 08:49 AM

Jan 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WH delays implementation of equal coverage provsion thus enabling corporations to [View all] cali Jan 2014 OP

They got the rules laid down for the poor folks, folks what ain't got no voice Fumesucker Jan 2014 #1

it's just inexcusable. and illustrates something very ugly. cali Jan 2014 #2

Mockery works better than anger Fumesucker Jan 2014 #3

So, you agree with Issa that the IRS targeting geek tragedy Jan 2014 #43

mark me down as an apologist then because OKNancy Jan 2014 #4

It just wrong. They've had years to ensure that exactly this kind of inequity NOT be extant. cali Jan 2014 #5

They=IRS. nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #44

Two honest questions Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #6

I only have guesses. I'm guessing the argument isn't that he's waiving the law cali Jan 2014 #7

Hypothetical scenario -- Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #8

None of the above can be sued for the harm you posit. Romulox Jan 2014 #9

The government gets sued constantly for failing to abide by its own laws/rules. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #12

The government has what is known as "Sovereign Immunity". Romulox Jan 2014 #14

Google, "filed suit against the federal government" and then list each individual story separately. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #16

"the fed. government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity" Romulox Jan 2014 #17

So if some bureaucrat decides to destroy your livelihood Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #19

Knowing something isn't the same thing as being "OK with that". It's not advocacy, it's just fact. Romulox Jan 2014 #31

I didn't say you would advocate. I'm asking if you'd resign yourself without challenge. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #34

Basic administration law. joshcryer Jan 2014 #37

It's called selective enforcement Savannahmann Jan 2014 #40

Thank you for revealing yourself. geek tragedy Jan 2014 #42

Thank you very much. Savannahmann Jan 2014 #46

It was the *individual* mandate$$ that corporate insurers so desired. And that's what they got. Romulox Jan 2014 #10

More ProSense Jan 2014 #11

and your posts are an embarassment and not even tenuously related to reality or cali Jan 2014 #15

Want to ProSense Jan 2014 #18

Your posts deny reality, and really are nothing but cheerleading cali Jan 2014 #20

I really think ProSense Jan 2014 #21

I don't need to expend much energy, sadly. His record speaks for itself cali Jan 2014 #22

Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #23

I thought his legacy was going to be endless war in Syria? JoePhilly Jan 2014 #24

his foreign policy legacy is hardly anything to celebrate. cali Jan 2014 #25

Right, ending two wars, making real progress with Iran ... just awful. JoePhilly Jan 2014 #26

Hey, ProSense Jan 2014 #28

"...anti-Obama drivel based on an MSM report you don't even understand." Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #38

Cali agrees with Darrel Issa that Obama runs the IRS and geek tragedy Jan 2014 #45

There's a new one every day. woo me with science Jan 2014 #13

those who adore the President without any meacure of critical thought cali Jan 2014 #27

"provsion" "meacure" ProSense Jan 2014 #29

Gee, I wonder which way it will go... employees to get better coverage or the executives get worse? gtar100 Jan 2014 #30

Here's how it ProSense Jan 2014 #32

Regulations with actual teeth! That is so different from what we've been seeing in so many other gtar100 Jan 2014 #36

lets see frwrfpos Jan 2014 #33

The SC ruling on the Constitutionality of the ACA was late June 2012. JNinWB Jan 2014 #35

Bush tax cuts for the rich RandiFan1290 Jan 2014 #39

This post reminds me of Republicans bashing geek tragedy Jan 2014 #41