Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
30. You haven't been following the story, clearly.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 06:21 PM
Jan 2014

The journal is HAND WRITTEN.

You do know it's possible for a forensic examiner to determine when something was written? They may not be able to get it down to a date-time grouping, but they can tell if something has been recently written or is older.

There's an entire subset of forensics devoted solely to document examination.

Here's one professional organization's website:

http://www.swafde.org/faq.html

And here's how they figure out when something was written:

Two new methods of determining the relative age of ballpoint inks has recently come to the forefront in forensic-document examination. Studies have shown that different inks have different drying times. The new method for analyzing the drying time of ink is done by chemical analysis. Unfortunately, this is a destructive process.

These new developments are extremely important when examining ledger or medical-record entries. It has been established that the longer ink has been on a sheet of paper, the slower it will dissolve in the various solvents used to analyze them. It is now possible to identify the age of ink to within a six-month period. This new process of dating the age of inks has had dramatic impact on the examination and detection of backdated documents. Many malpractice cases have been won due to the analysis of ink on questioned medical records.

http://www.evidencemagazine.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=267

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She is generally pretty awful Armstead Jan 2014 #1
Check out this tool's wiki: Wilms Jan 2014 #2
Lovely---a "neoconservative blogger." And we're supposed to rely on her for unbiased viewpoints? MADem Jan 2014 #5
The Post (R) shit the cred bed long ago Berlum Jan 2014 #10
This is great - DURHAM D Jan 2014 #9
Never trust a neocon. Kingofalldems Jan 2014 #23
I with you Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #3
What do you mean, "a little thin?" Please be specific. nt MADem Jan 2014 #6
You know exactly what I mean, but Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #8
I don't think you've quite explained your thinking yet. Demit Jan 2014 #13
I'm insinuating the journal narrative is thin. Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #16
I don't know about controversial, but it is oblique. Demit Jan 2014 #17
I'm good. Thanks. Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #19
Alone, perhaps. salin Jan 2014 #20
That's a great report Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #22
Perhaps, salin Jan 2014 #27
Fair enough Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #29
That's Fed money. Kingofalldems Jan 2014 #24
If I am reading correctly... the state is divvying up salin Jan 2014 #28
I think you're using a term you don't quite understand, actually. Demit Jan 2014 #21
Right. No, I'm just not taking the bait Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #25
You haven't been following the story, clearly. MADem Jan 2014 #30
Clearly. Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #32
It's not thin at all--she has a contemporaneous diary that is detailed. MADem Jan 2014 #34
Here's your quarter Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #35
What are you saying? I think we're starting to get a clue. nt MADem Jan 2014 #36
Have to agree seveneyes Jan 2014 #15
I invite your attention to advances in forensic science that have occurred over the last, errr, 100 MADem Jan 2014 #31
I expect she wrote a similar article about Fox and Benghazi? Barack_America Jan 2014 #4
Funny you should ask n2doc Jan 2014 #11
Blah,Blah,Blah otohara Jan 2014 #7
mrs rubin fails to see her own bias. spanone Jan 2014 #12
Another nobody pops up out of nowhere. nt Snotcicles Jan 2014 #14
Rubin must have photos of her boss with the nanny LittleBlue Jan 2014 #18
She writes like SHE was the nanny! MADem Jan 2014 #33
She is a tool of the right wing hrmjustin Jan 2014 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo's Jen Rubin: The Sca...»Reply #30