Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: One cannot simultaneously want the TPP and economic justice for the 99% [View all]whistler162
(11,155 posts)135. Wood pulp mostly.....
at least in my toilet paper products.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
One cannot simultaneously want the TPP and economic justice for the 99% [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Jan 2014
OP
yes but one can PRETEND to want economic justice for the 99% until one gets the TPP passed! nt
msongs
Jan 2014
#4
That's one of the better questions. Sunlight is probablhy the cure, but you can't bring enough alone
jtuck004
Jan 2014
#8
Krugman said it was nothing really to tout if you're for it or grieve over if you're against it.
ProgressSaves
Jan 2014
#6
Dr. Krugman is both brilliant and on the right side, socially. But keep in mind that he is
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2014
#36
You return trolls are so easy to spot. Good Riddance. I'll catch you again next time.
morningfog
Jan 2014
#120
nt = no text in the subject part of the response. The title is the full reply /nt
think
Jan 2014
#154
"It's been my experience . . . " since when - January 2 when you joined the site?
markpkessinger
Jan 2014
#87
One can't be for higher/progressive taxes, stronger unions, an effective safety net, a strong middle
pampango
Jan 2014
#13
Since Canada and Mexico are part of the TPP (which will supercede NAFTA), I would say the
pampango
Jan 2014
#16
Agreed. It a bit of a misnomer to call it a 'free trade' agreement, perhaps why those words are not
pampango
Jan 2014
#94
We know they are in there but don't yet know how strong and effective they are.
pampango
Jan 2014
#50
Nor can one want the TPP and transparent, non-corrupt governance simultaneously.
Faryn Balyncd
Jan 2014
#15
Lol, the hyperbole and hatred in this post is pretty classic. "sick, sick" "sociopaths" "violently
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#40
Frightened that this will go through, I'm wonder what the hell to do about it then.
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2014
#51
Truthfully, I don't think there is any creditable proof NAFTA ITSELF caused problems. The world has
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#101
Actually, I have never believed anyone but Oswald did it. This TPP, however, sure has become a
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#110
You too can't produce a concrete example of how it will hurt. And, I doubt you have the credentials
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#129
Surely you can respond with a a phrase of a few words, if you know of negative consequences.
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#131
Why should we impose our environmental laws on others. Heck, most are better than ours.
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#148
Manny.... It's all in the definitions. Everyone knows that the 0.01% knows best
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#66
K&R Every investor in Wall St is paying for it. No one works harder for it than them. nt
raouldukelives
Jan 2014
#81
"TPP is being pushed by The Only HopeTM for economic justice: ergo, it'll serve the 99%"
MisterP
Jan 2014
#109