Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

herding cats

(20,051 posts)
10. I didn't know about this!
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 10:32 PM
Jan 2014

From a different source, but still on topic.

Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver (D-Essex) said the bill would have written oversight into state law, rather than taking the Republican governor’s word for it.

“Residents devastated by this storm deserve the peace of mind that the billions in federal funds slated for the recovery will be administered efficiently and appropriately,” Oliver said. “This bill would have done that. Now all they have is a stated goal from the governor that can be broken or rescinded without the power of law. With his veto, the governor has weakened oversight and transparency of Hurricane Sandy relief funding.”

The Christie administration has already come under fire for awarding a no-bid debris-removal contract to a politically connected Florida firm, AshBritt, by “piggybacking” off an old Connecticut contract. The administration maintained the approach was the quickest way to clean up storm debris, and the work has since been competitively bid.

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/christie_vetoes_sandy_oversigh_1.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes he did! hrmjustin Jan 2014 #1
Cockroaches hate daylight. jsr Jan 2014 #2
Thank you for finding this. Raine1967 Jan 2014 #3
Premeditation to crime. jsr Jan 2014 #6
Very interesting! nt dorkzilla Jan 2014 #4
very interesting.... SummerSnow Jan 2014 #5
You know what else he vetoed? ProSense Jan 2014 #7
So basically Christie doesn't want anyone to know anything dorkzilla Jan 2014 #8
Christie doesn't want anyone to know anything rocktivity Jan 2014 #17
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #18
hee-hee. Baitball Blogger Jan 2014 #9
I didn't know about this! herding cats Jan 2014 #10
Smoking Gun #15 by my count. Kingofalldems Jan 2014 #11
For Christie there are only 2 possibilities, defacto7 Jan 2014 #12
No, Something Completely Different... Laxman Jan 2014 #16
and you don't call that defacto7 Jan 2014 #20
Oh why? 'Cause he better things to do with the Cha Jan 2014 #13
It's a good thing Obama is not running for President again. Christie would tarnish his image. nt kelliekat44 Jan 2014 #14
Yum! rocktivity Jan 2014 #15
Sounds like audit needed and all results posted to web on point Jan 2014 #19
No matter how all this eventually turns out calguy Jan 2014 #21
I wonder if that got overridden? Because they do have a "transparency" web site pnwmom Jan 2014 #22
That's why he's known as "Richard Cranium" in New Jersey! George II Jan 2014 #23
Curiouser and curiouser... The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2014 #24
Festivus for the rest of us!!! DillyDally Jan 2014 #25
Someone needs to send this to Josh Marshall and Steve Kornacki n/t RandySF Jan 2014 #26
Interesting how he BOOMS lists at the listener. Festivito Jan 2014 #27
Oops! malaise Jan 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Christie Vetoes Sandy Rel...»Reply #10