Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
21. I really think
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:45 AM
Jan 2014

"Your posts deny reality, and really are nothing but cheerleading that's all they've ever been.

Obama's legacy? corporate pal."

...that you trying hard to establish your superiority by constantly calling others "apologists" and claiming that supporting the President is "cheerleading." I mean, you're so anti-Obama that, here, in 2013, with three years left in his Presidency, you're spending every energy to discredit him and define his "legacy."

Here's a little "reality" for you to "deny," the record of your "corporate pal":

Why It Matters That Home Care Workers Just Got New Labor Rights
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023684107

There is no question that Dodd-Frank was a strong bill—the strongest in three generations.
http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf

Obama weighing executive action on minimum wage?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024354098

President Obama repeats call to end subsidies for Big Oil
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002436787

Lisa Jackson to Leave EPA: Earthjustice Statement

Statement from Earthjustice Vice President of Litigation Patti Goldman:


“America owes Lisa Jackson a debt of gratitude for her work to protect the public's health from polluters and their allies in Congress. For her efforts to clean up pollution and better protect the environment and public health, she faced a steady barrage from members of Congress and the industrial polluters who back them. Her detractors are the same people who told us taking lead out of gasoline in the 1970's would break the economy and that taking acid out of acid rain in the 1990's would ruin the country. In both cases, the environment and economy were strengthened and this is the approach Lisa Jackson took. There is a lot of unfinished business started by Jackson that the next EPA director will need to attend to. Whoever it is, they'll need the support of the President and they'll need to be ready for a non-stop barrage of attacks from the chemical, industrial and fossil fuel industries and their allies in Congress.

After 17 years of Earthjustice litigation it was Lisa Jackson who finally regulated mercury and other toxic pollutants coming from power plants. After a decade of litigation from Earthjustice and others, it was Lisa Jackson who supported and implemented regulations aimed at curbing greenhouse gases. After more than a decade of Earthjustice litigation it was Lisa Jackson who finally implemented the first regulation of mercury from cement kilns all over the country.”

http://earthjustice.org/news/press/2012/lisa-jackson-to-leave-epa-earthjustice-statement

The first lawsuit against Obama’s new coal limits just got filed
http://grist.org/climate-energy/the-first-lawsuit-against-obamas-new-coal-limits-just-got-filed/

WTO Upholds Obama’s Tire Industry Relief Decision

The World Trade Organization’s (WTO’s) Appellate Body yesterday upheld President Obama’s decision based on U.S. trade law to provide relief for American tire industry workers against surging imports from China of passenger and light truck tires.

In September 2009, Obama became the first president to enforce U.S. trade law when he imposed tariffs to protect domestic workers against a surge in tire imports from China. The original complaint came from the United Steelworkers (USW), and Obama’s decision led to a rebound in the tire industry.

http://blog.aflcio.org/2011/09/06/wto-upholds-obamas-tire-industry-relief-decision/


MEDICARE’S FINANCIAL CONDITION

Medicare’s financial condition is measured in several ways, including the solvency of the Part A Trust Fund, the annual growth in spending, and growth in spending on a per capita basis. Average annual growth in total Medicare spending is projected to be 6.6% between 2010 and 2019, but 3.5% on a per capita basis (assuming no reduction in physician fees).

The Part A Trust Fund is projected to be depleted in 2024— eight years longer than in the absence of the health reform law—at which point Medicare would not have sufficient funds to pay full benefits, even though revenue flows into the Trust Fund each year. Part A Trust Fund solvency is affected by growth in the economy, which directly affects revenue from payroll tax contributions, and by demographic trends: an increasing number of beneficiaries, especially between 2010 and 2030 when the baby boom generation reaches Medicare eligibility age, and a declining ratio of workers per beneficiary making payroll contributions (Figure 4).

http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7305-06.pdf

The ACA increased the Medicaid rebate percentage.
http://www.medicaid.gov/AffordableCareAct/Timeline/Timeline.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024309532#post2

Net Investment Income Tax

A new Net Investment Income Tax goes into effect starting in 2013. The 3.8 percent Net Investment Income Tax applies to individuals, estates and trusts that have certain investment income above certain threshold amounts. The IRS and the Treasury Department have issued proposed regulations on the Net Investment Income Tax. Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail or hand delivered to the IRS. For additional information on the Net Investment Income Tax, see our questions and answers.

Additional Medicare Tax

A new Additional Medicare Tax goes into effect starting in 2013. The 0.9 percent Additional Medicare Tax applies to an individual’s wages, Railroad Retirement Tax Act compensation, and self-employment income that exceeds a threshold amount based on the individual’s filing status. The threshold amounts are $250,000 for married taxpayers who file jointly, $125,000 for married taxpayers who file separately, and $200,000 for all other taxpayers. An employer is responsible for withholding the Additional Medicare Tax from wages or compensation it pays to an employee in excess of $200,000 in a calendar year. The IRS and the Department of the Treasury have issued proposed regulations on the Additional Medicare Tax. Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail or hand delivered to the IRS. For additional information on the Additional Medicare Tax, see our questions and answers.

http://www.irs.gov/uac/Affordable-Care-Act-Tax-Provisions


BTW, you still haven't answered this question: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024356791#post31

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They got the rules laid down for the poor folks, folks what ain't got no voice Fumesucker Jan 2014 #1
it's just inexcusable. and illustrates something very ugly. cali Jan 2014 #2
Mockery works better than anger Fumesucker Jan 2014 #3
So, you agree with Issa that the IRS targeting geek tragedy Jan 2014 #43
mark me down as an apologist then because OKNancy Jan 2014 #4
It just wrong. They've had years to ensure that exactly this kind of inequity NOT be extant. cali Jan 2014 #5
They=IRS. nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #44
Two honest questions Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #6
I only have guesses. I'm guessing the argument isn't that he's waiving the law cali Jan 2014 #7
Hypothetical scenario -- Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #8
None of the above can be sued for the harm you posit. Romulox Jan 2014 #9
The government gets sued constantly for failing to abide by its own laws/rules. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #12
The government has what is known as "Sovereign Immunity". Romulox Jan 2014 #14
Google, "filed suit against the federal government" and then list each individual story separately. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #16
"the fed. government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity" Romulox Jan 2014 #17
So if some bureaucrat decides to destroy your livelihood Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #19
Knowing something isn't the same thing as being "OK with that". It's not advocacy, it's just fact. Romulox Jan 2014 #31
I didn't say you would advocate. I'm asking if you'd resign yourself without challenge. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #34
Basic administration law. joshcryer Jan 2014 #37
It's called selective enforcement Savannahmann Jan 2014 #40
Thank you for revealing yourself. geek tragedy Jan 2014 #42
Thank you very much. Savannahmann Jan 2014 #46
It was the *individual* mandate$$ that corporate insurers so desired. And that's what they got. Romulox Jan 2014 #10
More ProSense Jan 2014 #11
and your posts are an embarassment and not even tenuously related to reality or cali Jan 2014 #15
Want to ProSense Jan 2014 #18
Your posts deny reality, and really are nothing but cheerleading cali Jan 2014 #20
I really think ProSense Jan 2014 #21
I don't need to expend much energy, sadly. His record speaks for itself cali Jan 2014 #22
Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #23
I thought his legacy was going to be endless war in Syria? JoePhilly Jan 2014 #24
his foreign policy legacy is hardly anything to celebrate. cali Jan 2014 #25
Right, ending two wars, making real progress with Iran ... just awful. JoePhilly Jan 2014 #26
Hey, ProSense Jan 2014 #28
"...anti-Obama drivel based on an MSM report you don't even understand." Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #38
Cali agrees with Darrel Issa that Obama runs the IRS and geek tragedy Jan 2014 #45
There's a new one every day. woo me with science Jan 2014 #13
those who adore the President without any meacure of critical thought cali Jan 2014 #27
"provsion" "meacure" ProSense Jan 2014 #29
Gee, I wonder which way it will go... employees to get better coverage or the executives get worse? gtar100 Jan 2014 #30
Here's how it ProSense Jan 2014 #32
Regulations with actual teeth! That is so different from what we've been seeing in so many other gtar100 Jan 2014 #36
lets see frwrfpos Jan 2014 #33
The SC ruling on the Constitutionality of the ACA was late June 2012. JNinWB Jan 2014 #35
Bush tax cuts for the rich RandiFan1290 Jan 2014 #39
This post reminds me of Republicans bashing geek tragedy Jan 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WH delays implementation ...»Reply #21