Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who determined that the NSA and TPP are the most important issues? [View all]ronnie624
(5,764 posts)398. Your post suggests
that you're unaware of the history of the working class struggle for social justice. It's as if there was never a labor movement in your own country. How very odd for someone who presumably identifies with the principles of equality and democracy.
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Job Loss, Lower Wages and Higher Drug Prices
The TPP would even elevate individual foreign firms to equal status with sovereign nations, empowering them to privately enforce new rights and privileges, provided by the pact, by dragging governments to foreign tribunals to demand taxpayer compensation over policies that they claim undermine their expected future profits.
We only know about the TPPs threats thanks to leaks the public is not allowed to see the draft TPP text. Even members of Congress, after being denied the text for years, are now only provided limited access. Meanwhile, more than 600 official corporate trade advisors have special access. The TPP has been under negotiation for five years, and the Obama administration wants to sign the deal by early 2014. Opposition to the TPP is growing at home and in many of the other countries involved.
The TPP would even elevate individual foreign firms to equal status with sovereign nations, empowering them to privately enforce new rights and privileges, provided by the pact, by dragging governments to foreign tribunals to demand taxpayer compensation over policies that they claim undermine their expected future profits.
We only know about the TPPs threats thanks to leaks the public is not allowed to see the draft TPP text. Even members of Congress, after being denied the text for years, are now only provided limited access. Meanwhile, more than 600 official corporate trade advisors have special access. The TPP has been under negotiation for five years, and the Obama administration wants to sign the deal by early 2014. Opposition to the TPP is growing at home and in many of the other countries involved.
http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=3129
More Power to Corporations to Attack Nations
A major goal of U.S. multinational corporations for the TPP is to impose on more countries a set of extreme foreign investor privileges and rights and their private enforcement through the notorious investor-state system. This system elevates individual corporations and investors to equal standing with each TPP signatory country's government- and above all of us citizens.
Under this regime, foreign investors can skirt domestic courts and laws, and sue governments directly before tribunals of three private sector lawyers operating under World Bank and UN rules to demand taxpayer compensation for any domestic law that investors believe will diminish their "expected future profits." Over $3 billion has been paid to foreign investors under U.S. trade and investment pacts, while over $14 billion in claims are pending under such deals, primarily targeting environmental, energy, and public health policies.
A major goal of U.S. multinational corporations for the TPP is to impose on more countries a set of extreme foreign investor privileges and rights and their private enforcement through the notorious investor-state system. This system elevates individual corporations and investors to equal standing with each TPP signatory country's government- and above all of us citizens.
Under this regime, foreign investors can skirt domestic courts and laws, and sue governments directly before tribunals of three private sector lawyers operating under World Bank and UN rules to demand taxpayer compensation for any domestic law that investors believe will diminish their "expected future profits." Over $3 billion has been paid to foreign investors under U.S. trade and investment pacts, while over $14 billion in claims are pending under such deals, primarily targeting environmental, energy, and public health policies.
http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=5411&frcrld=1
DELAURO: FOOD SAFETY CRITICAL ISSUE IN UPCOMING TRADE TALKS
As the Food and Drug Administrations (FDA) recent report on the safety of imported food emphasizes, the increasing globalization of Americas food supply is posing difficult challenges to both our regulatory system and public health. In 1994, the year Congress voted for United States membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO), half of the seafood consumed by Americans was imported. Today that figure is 84 percent.
Yet, our regulatory capacity has not kept up with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently concluding in a report that the FDA currently has only limited oversight, a reliance on the review of paper and not actual production facilities, and an ineffectively implemented sampling program that looks for only 16 drugs, compared to other countries that look for up to 57 drug residues. According to the GAO, FDA tests only 0.1 percent of all imported seafood products for only a few drug residues. Simultaneously, the food-safety related provisions of past U.S. trade agreements have imposed constraints on signatory countries domestic food safety standards and import protocols.
Accordingly, a TPP FTA has the potential to undermine the broadly supported public health goal that the food Americans consume must be safe. The FDA, for example, has already issued 25 import alerts for Vietnam this year with Vietnamese seafood detained for misbranding, E. coli and more. Seafood imports from Vietnam are plagued by unusually high levels of antibiotic residues, microbial contamination, and other serious food safety concerns confirmed by FDA laboratory testing. Between 2003 and 2006, more than one-fifth of all veterinary drug residues that FDA identified in imported seafood were in imports from Vietnam even as less than 4 percent of all imported seafood in the time period was shipped from that country.
As the Food and Drug Administrations (FDA) recent report on the safety of imported food emphasizes, the increasing globalization of Americas food supply is posing difficult challenges to both our regulatory system and public health. In 1994, the year Congress voted for United States membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO), half of the seafood consumed by Americans was imported. Today that figure is 84 percent.
Yet, our regulatory capacity has not kept up with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently concluding in a report that the FDA currently has only limited oversight, a reliance on the review of paper and not actual production facilities, and an ineffectively implemented sampling program that looks for only 16 drugs, compared to other countries that look for up to 57 drug residues. According to the GAO, FDA tests only 0.1 percent of all imported seafood products for only a few drug residues. Simultaneously, the food-safety related provisions of past U.S. trade agreements have imposed constraints on signatory countries domestic food safety standards and import protocols.
Accordingly, a TPP FTA has the potential to undermine the broadly supported public health goal that the food Americans consume must be safe. The FDA, for example, has already issued 25 import alerts for Vietnam this year with Vietnamese seafood detained for misbranding, E. coli and more. Seafood imports from Vietnam are plagued by unusually high levels of antibiotic residues, microbial contamination, and other serious food safety concerns confirmed by FDA laboratory testing. Between 2003 and 2006, more than one-fifth of all veterinary drug residues that FDA identified in imported seafood were in imports from Vietnam even as less than 4 percent of all imported seafood in the time period was shipped from that country.
http://delauro.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=406:-delauro-food-safety-critical-issue-in-upcoming-trade-talks&catid=7:2011-press-releases&Itemid=23
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
416 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The American people have decided how important they are. That's how democracy works.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#35
Wrong. The corporate media has decided how important they are. No democracy was involved.
baldguy
Jan 2014
#131
No, I didn't friggin list prosecution of crimes as "one of the accomplishments".
ProSense
Jan 2014
#42
The lack of prosecutions is important because it demonstrates that while Obama likes to talk
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#62
The lack of prosecutions places in question Obama's sincerity on the economic inequality issue.
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#115
No, it's not and no amount of text is going to make it relevant to the point. n/t
ProSense
Jan 2014
#281
There were plenty of legal grounds to prosecute some of the bankers based on old fashioned fraud
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#66
Someone did a phony alert on this- pretending you're calling the OP a Nazi!!
bettyellen
Jan 2014
#125
The package of regulations didn't deal with the most important cause of the corruption.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#40
OK, you don't think it goes far enough. What does that have to do with the point?
ProSense
Jan 2014
#47
You are ignoring one very important thing that has so angered the American people wise politicians
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#65
Mortgage companies and banks committed fraud but the individuals who actually committed the
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#56
To save time I would direct you to the subthread that begins with post 31
flying rabbit
Jan 2014
#143
Because the Fourth Amendment is a precious right. It is a matter of safeguarding the Constitution.
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#70
The many, many millions buying smartphones and going online don't seem terribly worried
ucrdem
Jan 2014
#81
Dismsising a whole slew of great progressive activists as "single issue advocates"?
YoungDemCA
Jan 2014
#20
What you are doing is dismissing the millions of Democrats who opposed these policies from the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#44
This NSA is populated with Bush appointees and loyalists. Why? Why were they not all fired?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#76
'Snowden and Greenwald didn't expose any' I guess that's why Obama was surprised by what he learned
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#130
"any statutory or ethical violations that would merit disciplinary action," and no,
ucrdem
Jan 2014
#135
So we were lied to again when we were told that Obama was surprised when he heard they had spied
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#138
Personally, I think that economic inequality is the biggest issue of our time.
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#72
"Free Trade" has done so much to screw up the economy since the 1990's. That it IS a core issue
Armstead
Jan 2014
#31
TPP is a continuation of previous "free trade policies" whose results are already known.
Armstead
Jan 2014
#43
I dion't see much of that going on, but feel free to fret about it if you want
Armstead
Jan 2014
#92
So this is whining about how others rank the importance of issues? Why should it matter
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#167
It will be if people ignore it. Which is the answer to your question. Why is it so important now?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#55
But Obama is sponsoring TPP. That's why we don't totally believe his sincerity about dealing
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#74
Tax cuts for the rich, corporate deregulation, 'right-to-work laws', slashing the safety net
pampango
Jan 2014
#136
You thought the Bush economy was fine? JAYSUS! No wonder folks are world's apart on economics
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#189
NAFTA included provisionbs that made it eassier and more attractive to remove econoimic sovergnty
Armstead
Jan 2014
#205
Try reading the services, financial serv and ag chapters of NAFTA, the WTO, or
OrwellwasRight
Jan 2014
#307
The percentage of middle class people that benefit enough from the stock market to make a difference
laundry_queen
Jan 2014
#268
1) To countries offering the lowest wages and most lax environmental regulations...
SMC22307
Jan 2014
#271
The overall results of NAFTA on the working class are negative in both the US and Mexico.
ronnie624
Jan 2014
#366
You said the economy was fine, I did not say that NAFTA was the sole cause
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#395
The TPP is a big obstacle to better wages for working people and for lifting up the middle class.
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#46
The most important issue is free and fair voting. If the corps control our votes, all other issues
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#49
Wow that's a lot of schutf and links. But none will matter if our votes go thru
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#246
How about you let each DUer decide for themselves what the most important issues
kelly1mm
Jan 2014
#59
The President did, by giving a speech today about the window dressing you are calling reform
bobduca
Jan 2014
#61
You decided NSA was important. Not long ago, you were posting almost Hourly Anti-Snowden,
Katashi_itto
Jan 2014
#68
No, I didn't. I can post about a number of things often and in a timely manner.
ProSense
Jan 2014
#78
That one particular post. You sometimes posted screeds. But it was mostly Pro NSA propaganda
Katashi_itto
Jan 2014
#106
Do an advanced search for the threads you started between June 6 and July 3 in GD
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#141
So are you saying we shouldn't pay any attention to your threads, because you babble
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#161
You say 'Volume doesn't equal "most important."'; so I ask you what does equal "most important"
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#163
You still aren't saying how we're meant to know what you think is important
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#166
So you can't justify starting about 5 NSA threads per day for a month, and then complaining
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#169
What the hell does "starting" threads about the NSA have to do with my point?
ProSense
Jan 2014
#171
No, it's when you start 150 of them in a month, a clear majority of the threads you started
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#177
Do you know how he created that surplus? By cutting social programs, by cutting
truedelphi
Jan 2014
#267
you don't think the TPP will impact inequality and the middle class? why do I hear "Aegukka"?
MisterP
Jan 2014
#109
some force or group within government or the MIC that ... gives marching orders
Ghost Dog
Jan 2014
#248
On DU you know the names and they're good at milking the same issues.
great white snark
Jan 2014
#139
The only "ex" freeper we have here on DU agrees with you 98% of the time. Ooops!
Romulox
Jan 2014
#154
No. The operative word is "freeper". Rightwing bullshit with a (D) after it remains rightwing
Romulox
Jan 2014
#157
151 House Dems Telling President They Will Not Support Outdated Fast Track for TPP
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#173
Maybe you can explain what the hell a letter to the President has to do with the OP?
ProSense
Jan 2014
#187
No clearly you need to think that or you wouldnt seem so condescending in every post
bobduca
Jan 2014
#201
I went ahead and decided that our surveillance state is pretty goddamned important.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2014
#193
DU Oxygen... rough estimate is 1 in 10 active posts...like owning the yellow and green properties...
Octafish
Jan 2014
#336
Nope went to shit and you cannot admit to it, it would cause you to admit to fault.
Rex
Jan 2014
#227
I'm not complaining about "nasty attacks" - your talking points don't upset me...
polichick
Jan 2014
#329
What do you see? Can you point to and provide actual evidence of what you "see"?
ProSense
Jan 2014
#358
That doesn't make sense. You're the one accusing people of being "paid shills/sock puppets"
ProSense
Jan 2014
#362
I don't deny anything I said - I deny there's a quote that backs up your reading...
polichick
Jan 2014
#374
The Hatch Act would have been violated. Can't you imagine the Issa hearing? nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#391
Can't make the TPP smell like anything but shit, so try to marginalize and minimize it.
djean111
Jan 2014
#295
Ending the costly trade agreements (&TPP) is essential to income equality.
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#399
Why so grumpy?- after all, the chocolate ration just got increased!
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#415