Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
6. So take God out of the equation. Does this logic apply to EVERY beautiful thing?
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 07:32 PM
Mar 2012

Does it include the resources those Africans spent on their own religions before Western culture colonized them?

Are secular courts better excuses than religious ones for high culture? Would an atheist Bach have made better music?

For me it has a lot less to do with which principles you value and a lot more to do with whether your morality about it is pre-conventional, conventional, or post-conventional.


MOST IMPORTANTLY - are the two really comparable in the sense that one can spend similar amounts of money in one or the other place with the same results. Religions with the power to really help the "suffering African babies" would have the power to overthrow the global economy and force it to treat Africa differently on a grand scale.

Is anyone here advocating for religions that powerful? Really?

Personally I think the "argument" to be a cheap emotional thrill, of the sort that we insist right-wingers ought to rise above.

I choose art over guilt. Always. It leads people to more effective action.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hells yeah. Brickbat Mar 2012 #1
My sentiments exactly siligut Mar 2012 #2
I couldn't agree more! n/t LeftofObama Mar 2012 #3
!!! one_voice Mar 2012 #4
Apologetics needed in aisle five! GoneOffShore Mar 2012 #5
So take God out of the equation. Does this logic apply to EVERY beautiful thing? saras Mar 2012 #6
When the purpose of the "art" boasts a higher level of moral authority, yes MNBrewer Mar 2012 #23
Isn't this kind of flaming shit more appropriate for the so-called "Religion" Cage Match forum? MADem Mar 2012 #7
Sports stars dripping in jewles don't claim they are messengers of Christ whose message includes: Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #12
What's the difference what the sheep worship? Sports heroes or Jesus? It's all about the money. MADem Mar 2012 #13
Michael? Mr. Savage? MiddleFingerMom Mar 2012 #14
Looking in your mirror, are you? MADem Mar 2012 #22
HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA MiddleFingerMom Mar 2012 #24
Why do you think acting like a jerk is funny? Why do you think calling me Michael Savage is cute? MADem Mar 2012 #25
It's not that big of a leap to make Major Nikon Mar 2012 #15
It just depends on your definition of "poor" you see. MADem Mar 2012 #21
It's the hypocrisy. CrispyQ Mar 2012 #26
That's the Mormon temple in Salt Lake City. Romney is a Mormon who is pacalo Mar 2012 #28
As usual MFM, you are so correct...n/t monmouth Mar 2012 #8
Thank you. MiddleFingerMom Mar 2012 #9
Hey, what's the Merry Band doing out of the lounge? Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2012 #20
as a man once said (disputed) Demonaut Mar 2012 #10
but much more importantly, how many FEWER children would be going to bed hungry tonight... MiddleFingerMom Mar 2012 #11
exactly nt nadine_mn Mar 2012 #16
Where did you find this? Skidmore Mar 2012 #17
Sorry - it was one of the many many picdump sites that I go to. No clue - literally. MiddleFingerMom Mar 2012 #19
Sorry, I'm calling Bullshit MannyGoldstein Mar 2012 #18
Perhaps their god does not see this as hypocrisy. chknltl Mar 2012 #27
Bravo, MFM!!! pacalo Mar 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sometimes so-called "...»Reply #6