Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: U.S. rhino hunt auction winner fears for his safety [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)59. No, the government is saying that, as well as scientists
Knowlton's supporters say this conservation strategy is based in smart science. The International Union for Conservation of Nature supported the Dallas Safari Club's black rhino hunting permit auction.
The union says its mission is to work with governments and conservation groups around the world to find "practical solutions" to conservation efforts around the world.
It also says "trophy hunting is a fundamental pillar of Namibia's conservation approach and instrumental in its success." And that "well-managed recreational hunting and trophy hunting" have had a positive impact in "stimulating population increases for rhino."
The union says its mission is to work with governments and conservation groups around the world to find "practical solutions" to conservation efforts around the world.
It also says "trophy hunting is a fundamental pillar of Namibia's conservation approach and instrumental in its success." And that "well-managed recreational hunting and trophy hunting" have had a positive impact in "stimulating population increases for rhino."
http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/20/us/omaha-plant-fire/index.html?iref=allsearch
Believe this or not, but we do this as well in the US with far from threatened species such as the white tail deer. You want to tell me where the population would be right now if we did not hunt it? (Hint, there are no natural hunters of the species in the environment right now in sufficient numbers, such as wolves)
I would not engage in hunting. It is not something I would like to do or appeals to me, but godamit, there is solid science to this idea of population management. So you would rather leave a non breeding bull in the wild that is killing BREEDING BULLS? How is that going help the population to recover exactly? I will be over there in the corner, sitting down, waiting for THAT ANSWER.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep. He should be kept alive and speared on his horn for a good amount of time.
Arugula Latte
Jan 2014
#38
You want someone to be mutilated simply because they're going to hunt an animal?
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#41
That's sickening. Hunting a game animal is a perfectly moral and honorable activity.
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#47
I suppose the difference between myself and some on this thread is that I don't wish harm on those
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#53
News flash: rhinos aren't people, and we treat them differently than we do humans.
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#64
Nobody's trying to give them the right to vote. But killing them means you're a terrible person.
LeftyMom
Jan 2014
#65
The one is which the particular member being hunted is older, male, nonbreeding, and likely to
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#66
Oh, for the love of God. You can't "murder" a rhino, any more than you can "murder" a sardine.
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#69
Call it killing, then. It makes no difference. Killing an endangered species for sport. How moral.
kwassa
Jan 2014
#71
Yes, hunting is fun. If you don't enjoy it, I suggest you don't hunt. Problem solved, yes?
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#78
So, animals are supposed to die for your entertainment? Sounds pretty sick to me.
kwassa
Jan 2014
#82
It appears our fundamental difference is that I don't hope for the maiming of those with whom I
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#89
This isn't controlled hunting. This is a psychologically warped publicity stunt.
kwassa
Jan 2014
#90
Of course. Unless somebody auctions off the rights and transfers them to the rhino,
LeftyMom
Jan 2014
#62
Yeah, I don't feel like getting banned over your bloodlust issues, thanks anyway.
Arugula Latte
Jan 2014
#100
You do realize that what you're saying about this rhino is what the Hunting Club is saying...
joeybee12
Jan 2014
#31
I think the thought process is that they were going to kill it anyway
The Straight Story
Jan 2014
#11
Sounds like he may get a chance to wrongly kill someone based on SYG before he has a chance to kill
Baitball Blogger
Jan 2014
#26
Hey, you're right...re-read the article THE HUNTING CLUB says the rhino would LIKELY
joeybee12
Jan 2014
#29
Much as the Koch brothers are above criticism as they've given more than $600 million in pledged or
LanternWaste
Jan 2014
#37
Managed hunting is probably the best chance these animals have to avoid extinction
Taitertots
Jan 2014
#40
The Safari Club auctioned the permit to raise money for efforts to protect the black rhino. wtf?
spanone
Jan 2014
#44
Those wishing harm on someone for hunting an animal are reacting emotionally, not rationally.
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#54
Of course it's rational. Taking pleasure from an activity is a perfectly rational act.
Larsonb
Jan 2014
#85