Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:15 PM Jan 2014

Supreme Court considers major change in public employee unions/ Court Split Ideologically [View all]


Supreme Court considers major change in public employee unions

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-considers-major-change-in-public-employee-unions/2014/01/21/6b4d2adc-82c4-11e3-bbe5-6a2a3141e3a9_story.html



By Robert Barnes, Tuesday, January 21, 6:20 PM E-mail the writer

The Supreme Court on Monday debated what one liberal justice said would be a “radical” restructuring of organized labor by prohibiting states from requiring public employees to pay fees to the unions that represent them.

The case from Illinois concerns home-care workers and whether those who do not join the public employees union must pay compulsory fees to cover the cost of collective bargaining. The Supreme Court since 1977 has said states have the power to require such payments — about half of them use it — so long as the fees are not used for political purposes.

The Supreme Court on Monday debated what one liberal justice said would be a “radical” restructuring of organized labor by prohibiting states from requiring public employees to pay fees to the unions that represent them.

The case from Illinois concerns home-care workers and whether those who do not join the public employees union must pay compulsory fees to cover the cost of collective bargaining. The Supreme Court since 1977 has said states have the power to require such payments — about half of them use it — so long as the fees are not used for political purposes.

But William L. Messenger, an attorney for the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, said the court should reconsider that precedent. Forcing public employees to support a union with which they might disagree violates their constitutional rights of association and free speech, he said.

“Our position is that in the public sector when government is involved, compulsory fees are illegal under the First Amendment,” Messenger said.

The case pits right-to-work supporters against labor unions and the Obama administration, and just as predictably mostly split the justices along ideological lines.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-considers-major-change-in-public-employee-unions/2014/01/21/6b4d2adc-82c4-11e3-bbe5-6a2a3141e3a9_story.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court considers m...