Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)

1. You're missing something here. It will be the WOMEN paying for their own ultrasounds ...

Reply to McCamy Taylor (Original post)

Sun Mar 18, 2012, 12:34 AM

Mar 2012

not taxpayer money.

And you can bet that the insurance companies will not cover the cost of the ultrasounds since they will be considered an unnecessary procedure - so like I said before the cost of the ultrasounds will be billed to the WOMEN having them.

So, where exactly is it that you think all that extra money would come from to pay for the things that you've listed in your OP?

I'm curious.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Healthcare resources being wasted on pre-abortion ultrasounds could be better spent.... [View all] McCamy Taylor Mar 2012 OP

You're missing something here. It will be the WOMEN paying for their own ultrasounds ... Tx4obama Mar 2012 #1

Wow do insurance companies really reject ultrasounds for pregnant women? dkf Mar 2012 #2

I do not think I have this wrong, because Tx4obama Mar 2012 #3