Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama To Discuss Inequality With Pope Francis In March [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)104. Wait
He has often appointed advisers and other high officials who come from the same Elitist and Corporate Swamp that has caused these problems. The same Wall St. Crowd that brought us financial deregulation, the same lobbyists who have screwed over the media, the same...etc.
...what does your opinion of his advisers have to do with policy? The President signed pushed for and enacted financial regulation.
There is no question that Dodd-Frank was a strong billthe strongest in three generations. http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf
He threw truly universal health care under the bus, did not even support the public option and put in place a system that further enslaves us to the health insurance industry.
So he shouldn't discuss inquality because the health care law didn't go far enough? I'd say providing tens of millions of Americans with access to health care, expanding Medicaid, qualifies as addressing a critical related issue.
ACA Signups: KA-POW!! Medicaid Overhaul Posted, CA Updated, Grand Total approaches 12M!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024368026
He floated the idea of a chained CPI to SS, and has bought into the whole Austerity Uber Alles mantra of the conservatives.
OK, now you're saying talk matters, your citing a proposal that hasn't been enacted, and likely never will be. As it stands now, the President strengthened the safety net.
The ACA increased the Medicaid rebate percentage.
http://www.medicaid.gov/AffordableCareAct/Timeline/Timeline.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024309532#post2
He has negotiated bad trade agreements and is now trying to push through an awful one, the TPP.
This is, again, an opinion without evidence. I mean, you say they're bad, but can you point to the effects? Also, the TPP hasn't even seen the light of day yet. I understand protesting the potential negatives (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024365795#post24) in the proposal, but it has yet to impact anything.
I'd feel a lot better about him if he was consistent in favor of liberal/progressive goals and his deeds matched his rhetoric more often.
Given your objections, that's never going to happen.
...what does your opinion of his advisers have to do with policy? The President signed pushed for and enacted financial regulation.
There is no question that Dodd-Frank was a strong billthe strongest in three generations. http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf
He threw truly universal health care under the bus, did not even support the public option and put in place a system that further enslaves us to the health insurance industry.
So he shouldn't discuss inquality because the health care law didn't go far enough? I'd say providing tens of millions of Americans with access to health care, expanding Medicaid, qualifies as addressing a critical related issue.
ACA Signups: KA-POW!! Medicaid Overhaul Posted, CA Updated, Grand Total approaches 12M!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024368026
He floated the idea of a chained CPI to SS, and has bought into the whole Austerity Uber Alles mantra of the conservatives.
OK, now you're saying talk matters, your citing a proposal that hasn't been enacted, and likely never will be. As it stands now, the President strengthened the safety net.
MEDICARES FINANCIAL CONDITION
Medicares financial condition is measured in several ways, including the solvency of the Part A Trust Fund, the annual growth in spending, and growth in spending on a per capita basis. Average annual growth in total Medicare spending is projected to be 6.6% between 2010 and 2019, but 3.5% on a per capita basis (assuming no reduction in physician fees).
The Part A Trust Fund is projected to be depleted in 2024 eight years longer than in the absence of the health reform lawat which point Medicare would not have sufficient funds to pay full benefits, even though revenue flows into the Trust Fund each year. Part A Trust Fund solvency is affected by growth in the economy, which directly affects revenue from payroll tax contributions, and by demographic trends: an increasing number of beneficiaries, especially between 2010 and 2030 when the baby boom generation reaches Medicare eligibility age, and a declining ratio of workers per beneficiary making payroll contributions (Figure 4).
http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7305-06.pdf
Medicares financial condition is measured in several ways, including the solvency of the Part A Trust Fund, the annual growth in spending, and growth in spending on a per capita basis. Average annual growth in total Medicare spending is projected to be 6.6% between 2010 and 2019, but 3.5% on a per capita basis (assuming no reduction in physician fees).
The Part A Trust Fund is projected to be depleted in 2024 eight years longer than in the absence of the health reform lawat which point Medicare would not have sufficient funds to pay full benefits, even though revenue flows into the Trust Fund each year. Part A Trust Fund solvency is affected by growth in the economy, which directly affects revenue from payroll tax contributions, and by demographic trends: an increasing number of beneficiaries, especially between 2010 and 2030 when the baby boom generation reaches Medicare eligibility age, and a declining ratio of workers per beneficiary making payroll contributions (Figure 4).
http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7305-06.pdf
The ACA increased the Medicaid rebate percentage.
http://www.medicaid.gov/AffordableCareAct/Timeline/Timeline.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024309532#post2
He has negotiated bad trade agreements and is now trying to push through an awful one, the TPP.
This is, again, an opinion without evidence. I mean, you say they're bad, but can you point to the effects? Also, the TPP hasn't even seen the light of day yet. I understand protesting the potential negatives (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024365795#post24) in the proposal, but it has yet to impact anything.
I'd feel a lot better about him if he was consistent in favor of liberal/progressive goals and his deeds matched his rhetoric more often.
Given your objections, that's never going to happen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
and this month the administration is beating the drums for fast track as the President
cali
Jan 2014
#1
"Batting zero..." This from the person whose flooded DU with Anti-Snowden Pro-NSA propaganda?
Katashi_itto
Jan 2014
#4
Deflect, sidestep and still "batting zero" see post #4 on that thread, here's your theme song
Katashi_itto
Jan 2014
#6
Its not deflection or sidestepping when you are the one trying to change the subject.
phleshdef
Jan 2014
#49
Everything is not about the TPP (which is probably not going to pass anyway). Obama should
pampango
Jan 2014
#17
It took a little bit, but the hypocrisy is so blatant you couldn't hide from it forever.
NCTraveler
Jan 2014
#38
I think Francis would be the last person one should talk to about inequality.
Vashta Nerada
Jan 2014
#37
"The Catholic Church is a leading supporter of HATRED and INEQUALITY WORLD WIDE against gays and
pampango
Jan 2014
#97
imo we should start looking at political and church corruption as moral issues too...
polichick
Jan 2014
#54
Why "or"? I mean, Citizens United creates the worst "conflicts of interest." n/t
ProSense
Jan 2014
#58
The problem existed decades before Citizens United. We have members of Congress...
polichick
Jan 2014
#61
Giffords, Sebelius, Salazar, Harman, Durbin, Daley - most out of office now...
polichick
Jan 2014
#68
Explain what that has to do with the issues you're dealing with related to your last comment? n/t
ProSense
Jan 2014
#76
Third Way needs to go - whether elected or selected. (Hopefully you can grasp that.)
polichick
Jan 2014
#108
Inequality? Such as the Pope getting 80 million in 'Peter's Pence' donations
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#53
If they were meeting with a preacher who preaches legal inequality for millions
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#60
Are you serious? 'They' in my post would be the FDR and LBJ of your imagination
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#78
Better than "Bush To Discuss How to Increase Inequality With Pope Benedict In March".
pampango
Jan 2014
#92
Wow! A thread which unites the Obama Haters and the Pope Bashers. A remarkable achievement.nt
bklyncowgirl
Jan 2014
#103