Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
104. Wait
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 06:23 PM
Jan 2014
He has often appointed advisers and other high officials who come from the same Elitist and Corporate Swamp that has caused these problems. The same Wall St. Crowd that brought us financial deregulation, the same lobbyists who have screwed over the media, the same...etc.

...what does your opinion of his advisers have to do with policy? The President signed pushed for and enacted financial regulation.

There is no question that Dodd-Frank was a strong bill—the strongest in three generations. http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf

He threw truly universal health care under the bus, did not even support the public option and put in place a system that further enslaves us to the health insurance industry.

So he shouldn't discuss inquality because the health care law didn't go far enough? I'd say providing tens of millions of Americans with access to health care, expanding Medicaid, qualifies as addressing a critical related issue.

ACA Signups: KA-POW!! Medicaid Overhaul Posted, CA Updated, Grand Total approaches 12M!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024368026

He floated the idea of a chained CPI to SS, and has bought into the whole Austerity Uber Alles mantra of the conservatives.

OK, now you're saying talk matters, your citing a proposal that hasn't been enacted, and likely never will be. As it stands now, the President strengthened the safety net.

MEDICARE’S FINANCIAL CONDITION

Medicare’s financial condition is measured in several ways, including the solvency of the Part A Trust Fund, the annual growth in spending, and growth in spending on a per capita basis. Average annual growth in total Medicare spending is projected to be 6.6% between 2010 and 2019, but 3.5% on a per capita basis (assuming no reduction in physician fees).

The Part A Trust Fund is projected to be depleted in 2024— eight years longer than in the absence of the health reform law—at which point Medicare would not have sufficient funds to pay full benefits, even though revenue flows into the Trust Fund each year. Part A Trust Fund solvency is affected by growth in the economy, which directly affects revenue from payroll tax contributions, and by demographic trends: an increasing number of beneficiaries, especially between 2010 and 2030 when the baby boom generation reaches Medicare eligibility age, and a declining ratio of workers per beneficiary making payroll contributions (Figure 4).

http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7305-06.pdf


The ACA increased the Medicaid rebate percentage.
http://www.medicaid.gov/AffordableCareAct/Timeline/Timeline.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024309532#post2

He has negotiated bad trade agreements and is now trying to push through an awful one, the TPP.

This is, again, an opinion without evidence. I mean, you say they're bad, but can you point to the effects? Also, the TPP hasn't even seen the light of day yet. I understand protesting the potential negatives (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024365795#post24) in the proposal, but it has yet to impact anything.

I'd feel a lot better about him if he was consistent in favor of liberal/progressive goals and his deeds matched his rhetoric more often.

Given your objections, that's never going to happen.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

and this month the administration is beating the drums for fast track as the President cali Jan 2014 #1
He's also ProSense Jan 2014 #2
"Batting zero..." This from the person whose flooded DU with Anti-Snowden Pro-NSA propaganda? Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #4
Here ProSense Jan 2014 #5
Deflect, sidestep and still "batting zero" see post #4 on that thread, here's your theme song Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #6
lol. what else is there? cali Jan 2014 #7
. Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #10
Facts? Still, you know the irony ProSense Jan 2014 #11
bwahahahaha. I love it when you get all agitated cali Jan 2014 #12
"Oh, and the Pope isn't pushing the tpp, pro." ProSense Jan 2014 #14
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #8
See post number 4 on that thread, seems you were doing that too Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #9
Its not deflection or sidestepping when you are the one trying to change the subject. phleshdef Jan 2014 #49
What does that have to do with anything in the OP of THIS thread? Number23 Jan 2014 #106
Agree! Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #3
Everything is not about the TPP (which is probably not going to pass anyway). Obama should pampango Jan 2014 #17
OMG RWNJ HEADS WILL EXPLODE! JaneyVee Jan 2014 #13
Not just the RW. ProSense Jan 2014 #15
Kick! n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #16
what on earth will you do when President Obama's term is over? cali Jan 2014 #18
Don't you ProSense Jan 2014 #19
Financial inequality, but not equality for women or LGBT people Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #20
If by ProSense Jan 2014 #21
Great post! dbackjon Jan 2014 #48
What the hell are they going to discuss? Glassunion Jan 2014 #22
What ProSense Jan 2014 #23
"Of course, Congress could help to advance this agenda." Glassunion Jan 2014 #24
Sure, Congress ProSense Jan 2014 #25
Seriously? NCTraveler Jan 2014 #26
You're ProSense Jan 2014 #28
Appreciate the backup. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #29
I see, ProSense Jan 2014 #30
Your post here needs to just stand on its own. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #31
Don't worry ProSense Jan 2014 #34
Your whole post is extremely strange. I wish you the best. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #35
No, it isn't, and in fact ProSense Jan 2014 #36
It took a little bit, but the hypocrisy is so blatant you couldn't hide from it forever. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #38
No, ProSense Jan 2014 #39
Good on you ProSense. I learned a valuable lesson here. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #40
Huh? LOL! BTW ProSense Jan 2014 #42
Thank you. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #43
Good photo-op. polichick Jan 2014 #27
Bully pulpit. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #32
Which one is the bully? :) polichick Jan 2014 #33
I think Francis would be the last person one should talk to about inequality. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #37
Yea because he's taking action ChangeUp106 Jan 2014 #41
What action? Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #44
When he takes action and removes hateful bigoted Cardinals dbackjon Jan 2014 #47
Wow Pro this post drew out the one issue wonders treestar Jan 2014 #45
Not one-issue wonders--- It's a whole host of things Obama has done Armstead Jan 2014 #88
No ProSense Jan 2014 #89
Ah the old cut-and-paste machine back in gear Armstead Jan 2014 #93
No, ProSense Jan 2014 #95
I made that distinction Armstead Jan 2014 #96
And ProSense Jan 2014 #98
I object to his actions that are contrary to his words Armstead Jan 2014 #99
This is ProSense Jan 2014 #100
In a nutshell... Armstead Jan 2014 #102
Wait ProSense Jan 2014 #104
What about the INEQUALITY that the Catholic Church spearheads against LGBT's? dbackjon Jan 2014 #46
"The Catholic Church is a leading supporter of HATRED and INEQUALITY WORLD WIDE against gays and pampango Jan 2014 #97
Kick! n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #50
Id like him to address poverty here in America frwrfpos Jan 2014 #51
Senator Sanders: ProSense Jan 2014 #52
imo we should start looking at political and church corruption as moral issues too... polichick Jan 2014 #54
Yeah, start ProSense Jan 2014 #56
Or you can look at the conflicts of interest our leaders have, or how... polichick Jan 2014 #57
Why "or"? I mean, Citizens United creates the worst "conflicts of interest." n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #58
The problem existed decades before Citizens United. We have members of Congress... polichick Jan 2014 #61
Really? ProSense Jan 2014 #64
Make that every Republican and every Third Way Dem. polichick Jan 2014 #66
OK by me. Here's a list ProSense Jan 2014 #67
Giffords, Sebelius, Salazar, Harman, Durbin, Daley - most out of office now... polichick Jan 2014 #68
So you want to remove people from office who are already "out of office" ProSense Jan 2014 #69
Being selected instead of elected does not make it better... polichick Jan 2014 #70
Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #71
You seem a bit nervous - don't want to finger your pals huh? polichick Jan 2014 #72
WTF? ProSense Jan 2014 #73
Nice try. You said to name names of those "enabling" the Third Way agenda... polichick Jan 2014 #74
Explain what that has to do with the issues you're dealing with related to your last comment? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #76
Your attempt to deflect ain't working. It's obvious you can't... polichick Jan 2014 #79
You know what this sounds like ProSense Jan 2014 #81
Okay, electing Third Way BAD; selecting Third Way GOOD. LOL polichick Jan 2014 #82
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #84
I know you have nothing - but even so, that's beyond lame... polichick Jan 2014 #105
LOL! ProSense Jan 2014 #107
Third Way needs to go - whether elected or selected. (Hopefully you can grasp that.) polichick Jan 2014 #108
Do you ProSense Jan 2014 #109
Inequality? Such as the Pope getting 80 million in 'Peter's Pence' donations Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #53
That makes no sense ProSense Jan 2014 #55
If they were meeting with a preacher who preaches legal inequality for millions Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #60
Again, ProSense Jan 2014 #62
Are you serious? 'They' in my post would be the FDR and LBJ of your imagination Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #78
Wait ProSense Jan 2014 #83
Yeah. Their talk will be as useful as a fart in the wind. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #59
This may come as a surprise ProSense Jan 2014 #63
I was talking about from the Pope's side of things. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #65
... in other people's countries. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2014 #75
For straight males in other countries. Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #80
Dang. This is working out better than I expected. Baitball Blogger Jan 2014 #77
The hilarious thing ProSense Jan 2014 #85
Well, I can see why some of them are skeptical. Baitball Blogger Jan 2014 #86
Well, ProSense Jan 2014 #87
I know. He could be a drover. Baitball Blogger Jan 2014 #90
It just seems that ProSense Jan 2014 #91
Better than "Bush To Discuss How to Increase Inequality With Pope Benedict In March". pampango Jan 2014 #92
Finally - someone to give it to Obama straight lame54 Jan 2014 #94
I know, right? ProSense Jan 2014 #101
Wow! A thread which unites the Obama Haters and the Pope Bashers. A remarkable achievement.nt bklyncowgirl Jan 2014 #103
Obama is aggressively pushing to *increase* inequality woo me with science Jan 2014 #110
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama To Discuss Inequali...»Reply #104