Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I hope it means they really are taking this seriously. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #1
You don't want a federal prosecutor after you modrepub Jan 2014 #3
Good points. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #5
The NJ legislative super committee is leaving this issue alone for now Gothmog Jan 2014 #8
she takes meticulous notes. they aren't going to be able to impugn her testimony or smear her bettyellen Jan 2014 #9
All true grantcart Jan 2014 #33
I think they are. herding cats Jan 2014 #6
Poor Fox News readers. They'll just have to continue relying on their comedy writers pacalo Jan 2014 #2
she knew better than to walk into that den of liars! bettyellen Jan 2014 #10
For sure -- I wish all Democrats would do the same. pacalo Jan 2014 #12
This is for the best herding cats Jan 2014 #4
Me as a layperson got that Cha Jan 2014 #7
You don't want to taint potential jurors Botany Jan 2014 #11
It is more about not having several different statements to defend Gothmog Jan 2014 #14
Fun! Cha Jan 2014 #15
Two people at risk means they can be played off against each other Babel_17 Jan 2014 #13
Right. The prosecutiors want to preserve the element of surprise or uncertainly BlueStreak Jan 2014 #35
Now that she can't talk to the media, watch the smear campaign against her. Mr.Bill Jan 2014 #16
I wish she had never gone public. She could have worn a wire and helped nab those thugs. cui bono Jan 2014 #17
After Bridgegate itsrobert Jan 2014 #18
Not much considering how sloppy they were with all the emails. n/t cui bono Jan 2014 #36
So very often, if a thing is not made public, it will be buried. rustbeltvoice Jan 2014 #21
Hope this means serious charges with serious consequences are in the works. obxhead Jan 2014 #19
They do seem to be holding funds from an area that had serious storm damage " fact". gordianot Jan 2014 #20
This means current level of evidence/knowledge indicates matter may go to indictment. Coyotl Jan 2014 #22
It will be fun to see who is indicted. Stuart G Jan 2014 #23
It will be months, I'm sure George II Jan 2014 #25
Makes sense - don't want to give them an excuse to appeal or have any charges dismissed George II Jan 2014 #24
It may not be a gag order. Sienna86 Jan 2014 #26
I do not think that it is a formal gag order Gothmog Jan 2014 #27
According to Rachel Maddow, the FBI is interviewing witnesses Gothmog Jan 2014 #28
I think it's too late. Damage is done. 2banon Jan 2014 #29
So true. The game is definitely rigged in favor of the powerful criminals, and against loudsue Jan 2014 #30
I'd be completely stunned if Christie doesn't walk away smelling like a rose.. 2banon Jan 2014 #34
But on the other hand Babel_17 Jan 2014 #38
good points. xing fingers justice prevails in this case. 2banon Jan 2014 #39
It Has To Do With The Integrity Of The Investigation DallasNE Jan 2014 #31
Good Explanation Gothmog Jan 2014 #32
Christie's is toast. MynameisBlarney Jan 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mayor Zimmer has been ask...»Reply #23