Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm not generally in favor of "banning" stuff, but maybe Carl's Jr. went a bit too far (maybe NSFW) [View all]DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)107. when i was dating most times i was taken out
for a good dinner -- then sometimes dancing -- it was the late 60s. sex came afterward.
i remember one of my boyfriends saying after we had a great meal "good food, good booze, and a good woman -- what more can a man ask for?"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not generally in favor of "banning" stuff, but maybe Carl's Jr. went a bit too far (maybe NSFW) [View all]
Atman
Jan 2014
OP
I've boycotted Carl's for decades, always will. Kartcher was an anti choice
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#1
There seems to be no end to the hypocrisy of the RW-family-values-anti-gay-anti-women-corporate-
kelliekat44
Jan 2014
#33
Well Pretz, that's fine for you. I grew up where Carl was personally funding
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2014
#71
Their ads are either over the top sex or very mean spirited. I watch their ads and think
OregonBlue
Jan 2014
#15
"Are there any ads with hot-n-sexxxy, speedo-clad men writhing around?" Why, yes, actually...
Atman
Jan 2014
#46
I'm impressed that you have such authority on that posters 'obsession' as you put it
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2014
#122
I agree. There's nothing sexy about that. I actually thought it was pretty yucky
Number23
Jan 2014
#100
Not giving a shit about objectification is a funny way of demonstrating that one likes women. nt
redqueen
Jan 2014
#35
I'll just leave it at GOOD DECISION.... Uggh, objectifying for the "gawd almighty" dollar....
hlthe2b
Jan 2014
#18
No woman could eat that 700 calorie hamburger and drink that 350 calorie soda and still have...
Shoulders of Giants
Jan 2014
#22
Nobody said you had to eat like that every day. But I see the point, regardless. n/t
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#89
"Acting is the ability to have an orgasm over shampoo, hamburgers, or cleaning products"
FSogol
Jan 2014
#30
I ate at carls jr. on a road trip once I don't remember being impressed or blown away by it
Arcanetrance
Jan 2014
#37
I guess I'm numb to embarrassing food advertising. Because it doesn't factor in my choices one way
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#92
The problem is that stereotyping is so easy, both for those who create the ads and those who watch
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#94
Like someone else said, even those who like both fast food burgers and attractive women
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#90
Being that you went there for sexist reasons, did you open the door for anyone while there?
The Straight Story
Jan 2014
#103
Here's an ad for Burger King's "BK Super 7-incher"...I don't think it won any sensitivity awards.
Captain Stern
Jan 2014
#111
That, IMHO, is much worse than the silly ad in the OP. It's completely offensive
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#112