Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Swagman

(1,934 posts)
11. is Anderson seeking 'relevance' or is he an 'egotist' as claimed about Snowden or Assange?
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 05:37 AM
Jan 2014

Snowden, Assange and Chelsea Manning are accused as "egotists' when speaking out. Unlike anyone else from all sides of politics. Everyone else makes a statement and you agree or disagree but this trio apparently must be derided, insulted and have false claims made about them, even on DU.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

did he use Google to confirm that? Whisp Jan 2014 #1
You mean Rogers? Who knows, now that he has been challenged for proof, he's in hiding! sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #2
I don't think he /she means Rodgers....they mean Cooper...what evidence did they present ? pkdu Jan 2014 #6
That is not the question people should be asking. CNN contacted Rogers who refused to speak to them. sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #7
Yo sabrina 1 (and anyone that cares) Titonwan Jan 2014 #14
Thank yuou Titowan, just saw it on DU. Excellent questions and answers from Snowden. So glad he is sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #67
He's a lot safer in Russia than some banana republic, nilesobek Jan 2014 #20
Erm NO....Cooper makes a claim ...he needs to defend it, that IS the question. Nt pkdu Jan 2014 #63
Anderson Cooper should prove that Snowden *isn't* a Russian spy? ronnie624 Jan 2014 #21
Cooper should defend his statement with evidence , as a reporter, abso- fuckin- lutely. Nt pkdu Jan 2014 #64
I have no doubt that Snowden's FSB lawyer confirmed that Snowden msanthrope Jan 2014 #19
I have no doubt you have some evidence of the ridiculous claim or you would never, ever sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #24
My dearest Sabrina--you misunderstand. Since Snowden is represented by an FSB lawyer, and msanthrope Jan 2014 #25
Got some links to what this lawyer has said? And the lawyer's name. I have no doubts otoh sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #34
Seriously....you don't know who Snowden's lawyer in Russia is? He's a book-lender. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #35
Yes, of course I know, I know who his lawyers are here. Care to provide the link where his lawyer sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #36
Go back and read what I wrote, Sabrina. You seem to be confused. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #38
I read what you wrote. You have no doubt that Cooper spoke to Anatoly Kucherena sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #42
Still ain't gettin' it, are you? msanthrope Jan 2014 #45
Don't worry, I get it, lol! Are you claiming that Snowden has no US attorneys? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #46
Can you name said counselor? I am unaware of the brave soul you claim has msanthrope Jan 2014 #47
Since the US stranded Snowden in Russia where he did not want to be, his father retained sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #48
Can you name that attorney????nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #51
After he was stranded in Russia by the US Government his father retained a US Attorney for him. I sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #53
Kindly name the attorney who has entered his appearance for Mr. Snowden? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #56
After the US Govt forced Snowden to remain in Russia sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #57
Again, can you kindly name Snowden's legal counsel in the US? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #58
Could you please state your opinion on the Republican moron who is currently in hiding, who sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #59
Again....can you kindly name Snowden's legal counsel in the US?????nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #60
So is Snowden a Russian Spy or not, in your opinion? Is there some reason why you are avoiding the sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #61
I never answer your questions. Tell me the name of Snowden's attorney, Sabrina!!! msanthrope Jan 2014 #62
Why don't you tell us the name of Snowden's attorney, I know you're dying to and we all know why! sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #65
Just tell us the name of.Mr. Snowden's American attorney. You seem to know it! nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #83
What s wrong with you? You can't find the answers yourself? riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #72
most aptly named bobduca Jan 2014 #80
Do you have the name of Mr. Snowden's American attorney? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #84
The ACLU has taken his case. I've already given a link about that riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #87
The ACLU has not been retained by Mr. Snowden, nor have they entered an appearance msanthrope Jan 2014 #88
Nobody has appeared in federal court for Snowden riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #90
You're now citing Tucker Carlson???? Fail..and lemme 'splain something to you.... msanthrope Jan 2014 #93
Again...kindly give me the name of Mr. Snowden's American lawyer. msanthrope Jan 2014 #82
Of course she knew and probably had a couple of links ready to try to discredit them. Isn't sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #86
Kindly tell us the name of Mr. Snowden's American attorney, please. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #89
Benjamin Wizner and Jessica Radack. Wizner is with the ACLU and Radack, a whistleblower herself... Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #91
Do you have a link to support that??? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #94
Why did the US Government strand Snowden in Russia? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #97
Sabrina, I don't answer your questions. you earned the honor of being the only DUer whose msanthrope Jan 2014 #98
You do answer my questions. See the previous sub thread. It's the other way around, I don't answer sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #99
I provided a link to Wizner in my post which you have ignored riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #101
Yeah...I don't click on the malware at Tucker Carlson's site. Do you have an actual.cite. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #102
You're provided a link and won't open it? Then want to claim ignorance? riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #103
'willful ignorance' is spot on. bobduca Jan 2014 #104
Crickets. I guess if the answer doesn't come from Sabrina. ..? riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #95
Um...you need to refresh your page more often...not only did I answer, msanthrope Jan 2014 #96
You've been provided with links riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #100
It's a game, which I have always refused to play. And each time when someone provides the supposed sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #105
Seem you think badly of anyone that embarrasse your authoritarian leader figures Clapper and Alexand rhett o rick Jan 2014 #50
I am kissing whom??? What are you saying??? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #52
I asked how you rationalize supporting strong authoritarian Republicans like Clapper and Alexander. rhett o rick Jan 2014 #68
Actually, in this thread I'm just trying to.find out who has been retained by Mr. Snowden msanthrope Jan 2014 #85
Those two Clapper and Alexender are Bush loyalists. Makes you wonder why they were fired five years sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #66
I wish it were that simple. Had you asked that of Obama, he wouldnt have told you rhett o rick Jan 2014 #69
Write someone in. If enough people did that, what would happen? Let's say a movement grew among the sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #71
If you could get enough votes to be a spoiler, then maybe the Democratic Party would rhett o rick Jan 2014 #73
"other than the Republican's statements..." and a certain particularly vocal contingent on DU Electric Monk Jan 2014 #3
I don't know, but you can be sure they'll be here soon. Th1onein Jan 2014 #4
You're not the only one who wonders why they bother to come here where their views are so much in sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #5
I hope they bring some evidence with them. So far, like CNN, I've had no luck getting anything other sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #8
What's a 'CT'? (n/t) Titonwan Jan 2014 #10
'Conspiracy Theory'. randome Jan 2014 #17
They have lots of Commie conspiracy theoriies. The vivid old cold war imaginings similar to the sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #26
team players all! bobduca Jan 2014 #70
K&R Titonwan Jan 2014 #9
is Anderson seeking 'relevance' or is he an 'egotist' as claimed about Snowden or Assange? Swagman Jan 2014 #11
Gloria's little man is obviously an ODS afflicted racist. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #13
I think Snowden is irrelevant at this point, but how can anyone look at either of those Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #12
It could be because Rogers statement was so outrageous and the Media has become so irrelvant itself sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #27
Now you trust CNN?... SidDithers Jan 2014 #15
The news media is inconsistent. Titonwan Jan 2014 #18
What's important, ronnie624 Jan 2014 #22
`` G_j Jan 2014 #31
You noticed that too? Never a shred of evidence offered. The old accusation by inference tactic sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #49
The right wing corporate media is not trustworthy. Which is why Rogers took his Conspiracy Theory to sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #28
A helluva lot more than the NSA and their bosses. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #33
I trust CNN over a repub like Mike Rogers. Why do you trust wingnut republicans? last1standing Jan 2014 #76
It's a good thing Snowden's reputation is still intact. randome Jan 2014 #16
Compared to Congress' and especially Republicans in Congress? Latest polls show young people sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #30
Sorry To Nitpick, But... Liberal_Dog Jan 2014 #23
Thanks, I will edit that, definitely do not want to give him any ideas! sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #32
Of course, had he claimed the opposite whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #29
Doesn't matter if you like Snowden or hate him... NCTraveler Jan 2014 #37
Those defending him from smears are defending Whistle Blowers, not especially him. Just as they sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #39
Who in this world should care about defending him from smears. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #40
Who in this world should care about their Government Officials lying to them? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #41
It is pretty clear I am addressing some of the right people. Not all of them of course. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #43
Whistle Blowers laws don't need to be changed, they need to be abided by. Throwing Whistle Blowers sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Jan 2014 #109
If Anderson Cooper says it... HipChick Jan 2014 #54
If a Republican says it must be true is what you're saying? I don't want to misunderstand your sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #55
Guity till proved innocent, huh? Accused without proof by a wingnut and you support that. last1standing Jan 2014 #77
His passport was revoked 22 June. He flew to Moscow 23 June. struggle4progress Jan 2014 #74
Exactly, they stranded him in Russia and more and more people are asking 'WHY'? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #75
Ain't that the truth. Titonwan Jan 2014 #78
He should have had better advisors, they could have told him if he had a warrant for felony Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #79
I don't need to check, I know what would happen if someone didn't have a passport. That sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #81
And he was issued an Ecuadorian travel document (later revoked) in order to leave Hong Kong. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #92
Thank you, Luminous Animal. Facts are beautiful things! sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #106
And this from Snowden Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #107
That is a shame. I read that and hope he is in a better job by now. He is so right, the world sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thank you Anderson Cooper...»Reply #11