Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thank you Anderson Cooper. 'No evidence that we could find that Snowden is a Russian Spy'! [View all]Swagman
(1,934 posts)11. is Anderson seeking 'relevance' or is he an 'egotist' as claimed about Snowden or Assange?
Snowden, Assange and Chelsea Manning are accused as "egotists' when speaking out. Unlike anyone else from all sides of politics. Everyone else makes a statement and you agree or disagree but this trio apparently must be derided, insulted and have false claims made about them, even on DU.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thank you Anderson Cooper. 'No evidence that we could find that Snowden is a Russian Spy'! [View all]
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
OP
You mean Rogers? Who knows, now that he has been challenged for proof, he's in hiding!
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#2
I don't think he /she means Rodgers....they mean Cooper...what evidence did they present ?
pkdu
Jan 2014
#6
That is not the question people should be asking. CNN contacted Rogers who refused to speak to them.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#7
Thank yuou Titowan, just saw it on DU. Excellent questions and answers from Snowden. So glad he is
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#67
Cooper should defend his statement with evidence , as a reporter, abso- fuckin- lutely. Nt
pkdu
Jan 2014
#64
I have no doubt you have some evidence of the ridiculous claim or you would never, ever
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#24
My dearest Sabrina--you misunderstand. Since Snowden is represented by an FSB lawyer, and
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#25
Got some links to what this lawyer has said? And the lawyer's name. I have no doubts otoh
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#34
Seriously....you don't know who Snowden's lawyer in Russia is? He's a book-lender. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#35
Yes, of course I know, I know who his lawyers are here. Care to provide the link where his lawyer
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#36
I read what you wrote. You have no doubt that Cooper spoke to Anatoly Kucherena
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#42
Don't worry, I get it, lol! Are you claiming that Snowden has no US attorneys?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#46
Since the US stranded Snowden in Russia where he did not want to be, his father retained
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#48
After he was stranded in Russia by the US Government his father retained a US Attorney for him. I
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#53
Could you please state your opinion on the Republican moron who is currently in hiding, who
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#59
So is Snowden a Russian Spy or not, in your opinion? Is there some reason why you are avoiding the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#61
I never answer your questions. Tell me the name of Snowden's attorney, Sabrina!!!
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#62
Why don't you tell us the name of Snowden's attorney, I know you're dying to and we all know why!
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#65
Just tell us the name of.Mr. Snowden's American attorney. You seem to know it! nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#83
The ACLU has not been retained by Mr. Snowden, nor have they entered an appearance
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#88
You're now citing Tucker Carlson???? Fail..and lemme 'splain something to you....
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#93
Of course she knew and probably had a couple of links ready to try to discredit them. Isn't
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#86
Benjamin Wizner and Jessica Radack. Wizner is with the ACLU and Radack, a whistleblower herself...
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#91
Sabrina, I don't answer your questions. you earned the honor of being the only DUer whose
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#98
You do answer my questions. See the previous sub thread. It's the other way around, I don't answer
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#99
Yeah...I don't click on the malware at Tucker Carlson's site. Do you have an actual.cite. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#102
You're provided a link and won't open it? Then want to claim ignorance?
riderinthestorm
Jan 2014
#103
It's a game, which I have always refused to play. And each time when someone provides the supposed
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#105
Seem you think badly of anyone that embarrasse your authoritarian leader figures Clapper and Alexand
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#50
I asked how you rationalize supporting strong authoritarian Republicans like Clapper and Alexander.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#68
Actually, in this thread I'm just trying to.find out who has been retained by Mr. Snowden
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#85
Those two Clapper and Alexender are Bush loyalists. Makes you wonder why they were fired five years
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#66
I wish it were that simple. Had you asked that of Obama, he wouldnt have told you
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#69
Write someone in. If enough people did that, what would happen? Let's say a movement grew among the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#71
If you could get enough votes to be a spoiler, then maybe the Democratic Party would
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#73
"other than the Republican's statements..." and a certain particularly vocal contingent on DU
Electric Monk
Jan 2014
#3
You're not the only one who wonders why they bother to come here where their views are so much in
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#5
I hope they bring some evidence with them. So far, like CNN, I've had no luck getting anything other
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#8
They have lots of Commie conspiracy theoriies. The vivid old cold war imaginings similar to the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#26
is Anderson seeking 'relevance' or is he an 'egotist' as claimed about Snowden or Assange?
Swagman
Jan 2014
#11
I think Snowden is irrelevant at this point, but how can anyone look at either of those
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2014
#12
It could be because Rogers statement was so outrageous and the Media has become so irrelvant itself
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#27
You noticed that too? Never a shred of evidence offered. The old accusation by inference tactic
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#49
The right wing corporate media is not trustworthy. Which is why Rogers took his Conspiracy Theory to
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#28
I trust CNN over a repub like Mike Rogers. Why do you trust wingnut republicans?
last1standing
Jan 2014
#76
Compared to Congress' and especially Republicans in Congress? Latest polls show young people
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#30
Those defending him from smears are defending Whistle Blowers, not especially him. Just as they
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#39
Who in this world should care about their Government Officials lying to them?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#41
It is pretty clear I am addressing some of the right people. Not all of them of course.
NCTraveler
Jan 2014
#43
Whistle Blowers laws don't need to be changed, they need to be abided by. Throwing Whistle Blowers
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#44
If a Republican says it must be true is what you're saying? I don't want to misunderstand your
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#55
Guity till proved innocent, huh? Accused without proof by a wingnut and you support that.
last1standing
Jan 2014
#77
Exactly, they stranded him in Russia and more and more people are asking 'WHY'?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#75
He should have had better advisors, they could have told him if he had a warrant for felony
Thinkingabout
Jan 2014
#79
I don't need to check, I know what would happen if someone didn't have a passport. That
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#81
And he was issued an Ecuadorian travel document (later revoked) in order to leave Hong Kong.
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#92
That is a shame. I read that and hope he is in a better job by now. He is so right, the world
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#108