Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Trans-Pacific Partnership looks like a giant step toward the end of sovereign nations. [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)44. They don't call it 'Globalization' for nothing.
The Global Plutocracy
By Andre Damon and Barry Grey
Global Research, January 21, 2014
World Socialist Web Site
On the eve of the annual spectacle of parasitic wealth and power that is the World Economic Forum in the Alpine resort town of Davos, Switzerland, the Oxfam charity has issued a report warning of the unprecedented growth of social inequality throughout the world.
Describing a planet in the malevolent grip of handful of plutocrats, the report states that the richest 85 people in the world control as much wealth as the bottom fifty percent of the worlds population3.5 billion people! It notes that the richest one percent today controls 46 percent of the worlds wealth. Oxfam writes: The wealth of the one percent richest people in the world amounts to $110 trillion 65 times the total wealth of the bottom half of the worlds population.
The report includes a chart showing that since 2008, the United States has had the largest increase in social inequality of any developed country.
?rendition=image480
The impoverishment of the working class on the one side and further enrichment of the financial elite on the other have accelerated since the Wall Street crash of that year. While the wealth of the worlds billionaires has doubled, there are today over 1 billion people living on less than a dollar per day, and nearly half the worlds population, more than 3 billion people, subsist on less than $2.50 per day.
CONTINUED...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-global-plutocracy/5365647
By Andre Damon and Barry Grey
Global Research, January 21, 2014
World Socialist Web Site
On the eve of the annual spectacle of parasitic wealth and power that is the World Economic Forum in the Alpine resort town of Davos, Switzerland, the Oxfam charity has issued a report warning of the unprecedented growth of social inequality throughout the world.
Describing a planet in the malevolent grip of handful of plutocrats, the report states that the richest 85 people in the world control as much wealth as the bottom fifty percent of the worlds population3.5 billion people! It notes that the richest one percent today controls 46 percent of the worlds wealth. Oxfam writes: The wealth of the one percent richest people in the world amounts to $110 trillion 65 times the total wealth of the bottom half of the worlds population.
The report includes a chart showing that since 2008, the United States has had the largest increase in social inequality of any developed country.
?rendition=image480
The impoverishment of the working class on the one side and further enrichment of the financial elite on the other have accelerated since the Wall Street crash of that year. While the wealth of the worlds billionaires has doubled, there are today over 1 billion people living on less than a dollar per day, and nearly half the worlds population, more than 3 billion people, subsist on less than $2.50 per day.
CONTINUED...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-global-plutocracy/5365647
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Trans-Pacific Partnership looks like a giant step toward the end of sovereign nations. [View all]
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
OP
Yes I can see how those that support Wall Street would support Clinton-Sachs. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#91
Do you think that H. Clinton-Sachs is a progressive? Do you think her close ties with
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#118
By whose definition is H. Clinton a progressive? Does she support FDR type regulations?
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#120
See you're already doing it." Nyah nyah I deal with facts. You're just making stuff up."
Armstead
Jan 2014
#133
Do I understand you to say that you think that the TPP and NAFTA are progressive? nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#146
Socially progressive -- But a corporate conservative on issues of money and power
Armstead
Jan 2014
#125
That does. I will never support her, wouldn't have anyway because of her support for War, but that
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#92
I agree. Now is the time to make it clear that if Dems push her they will lose. So they better start
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#97
They need to own their shit, their wars and their selling out the middle class.
NYC_SKP
Jan 2014
#105
Exactly. And in many ways it's our fault too for looking the other way because the alternative is
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#117
Is this a rhetorical question implying that anyone who thinks there is a "they"
ChisolmTrailDem
Jan 2014
#56
The right is all over the "One World Government" and FTA's and the WTO (One World Economy?)
pampango
Jan 2014
#42
I was once surprised to hear a Canadian say that NAFTA "only benefited the US"..
whathehell
Jan 2014
#109
The poll does not have anything to do with the TPP. The far right believes it is the 'liberal elite'
pampango
Jan 2014
#112
Perhaps not. But we share little in terms of the tea party world view, I suspect.
pampango
Jan 2014
#136
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't our international treaties and agreements almost always
pampango
Jan 2014
#138
So where is this leading? Will there be one world government run by someone chosen by the
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#11
Whoever is really running the show has 30,000 armed Drones coming to watch you where you live/work.
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#24
No one in power is worried about the American Empire. They are looking to a World government.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#13
They get their empire via these trade agreements, it's just not the American Empire.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#29
Harnessing the US military and infrastructure but above all of us (is what I suspect).
FiveGoodMen
Jan 2014
#69
They (our politicians) are expecting to be taken care of after they destroy our country.
indie9197
Jan 2014
#38
The TPP be the end of the Bretton Woods? The intent of FDR's 1944 conference is still alive.
pampango
Jan 2014
#43
Of Course It Is... They Just Don't Know How To Explain It, Without Using The Word FASCISM...
WillyT
Jan 2014
#16
Right Wing Watch: The NAFTA Superhighway and North American Union are far-right conspiracy theories
pampango
Jan 2014
#41
Remember when the GOP blocked the UN disabilities treaty in the Senate in 2012?
Cali_Democrat
Jan 2014
#145
There is a huge divide between the republican base and politicians on NAFTA and 'free trade'
pampango
Jan 2014
#115
So you provide graphs to illustrate how the trade treaties have killed the USA
brentspeak
Jan 2014
#122
The graphs show US manufacturing employment has been declining since 1955. What "trade treaties"
pampango
Jan 2014
#135
Thanks for not anwering the question. The 40 year decline in manufacturing jobs did not
pampango
Jan 2014
#152
No doubt but this is still a pretty significant actual legal advancement of that conclusion.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#123
I don't see how really. We'd have to be of a mind to pretty much go rogue, drop out of the WTO,
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#162
I Agree, Sir: This Is 'Corporate Sovereignity', And It Is An Abomination
The Magistrate
Jan 2014
#37
Selective examples. Try Singapore for a "country" that "trades the most." Like 270% of its GDP.
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#100
Singapore and Hong Kong are essentially city-states but your point about the importance of
pampango
Jan 2014
#113
This was the ultimate goal of world elites all along. Now resource/energy control can proceed
ancianita
Jan 2014
#68
Yes. The beginning of the end of nation-states, and the change to corporate-states.
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#72
Yes, more or less. The American Revolutionary War was between the colonies and
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#156
I feel that a World Parliament would be a good first step, particularly if we want...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2014
#99
First off no, second off, learn how to spell corporate if you want to try to be condescending...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2014
#111
The US says it wants to "expand democratic values" but does the opposite
solarhydrocan
Jan 2014
#114