General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The rich say they pay 40% of all taxes and that's "unfair"... [View all]JHB
(38,203 posts)...pay attention to the income levels tax brackets used to affect:
Adjusting for inflation, before the Kennedy-era tax cuts typically over (sometimes well over) half the brackets affected incomes over $250,000, with about 40% affecting incomes above $500,000. Inflation eroded those levels (the brackets were not indexed for inflation) until the late 70s, when the top bracket dipped those into the single digits. Reagan's tax cuts cut even those further, eliminating brackets starting at over 500K entirely. And at the end of his term, the top bracket kicked in at roughly the median income, not anything that could be considered high (BushI went back on his "read my lips" line because these were unsustainably low).
It seems, to paraphrase Leona Helmsley, that income tax progressivity is for little people.

In case you're wondering why I picked 1942 as a start date, it's purely for readability, thanks to my graphics skills or lack thereof. I need to figure out how to pull off skipping some intervals, because some of those inflation-adjusted brackets reach higher. Much higher:
