Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. Well, I've thought about it
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 11:28 AM
Jan 2014

And it comports with what I had been thinking about the Times's robust editorial stance regarding clemency for Snowden. Of course they want that, because they need the hackers to be their excuse to print the things they themselves would never report (and have never reported, because of a kind of journalistic "ethics" they've adopted regarding classified material). They can keep their noses clean while releasing documents obtained by others. It's a triple win: they get to end-run around their own rules about revealing classified material, sell lots of papers, and not even have to pay reporters!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Think about this quote by...»Reply #1