Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Vattel

(9,289 posts)

11. Um, I pointed out the inaccuracy. The problem is not the research

Reply to Progressive dog (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 24, 2014, 05:27 PM

Jan 2014

that, as you point out, shows that almost no responsible scientists dispute the claim that humans are causing global warming. The inaccuracy is in the article when it says that nearly 14,000 papers supported the claim that humans are causing global warming. The person who did the research is careful to point out that he was not looking at whether a paper supported or accepted or endorsed that claim.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Startling Number of Scientific Papers Disputed Human-Caused Global Warming Last Year [View all] sharp_stick Jan 2014 OP

I would love to see a little "global warming" this afternoon in northern Florida. ... spin Jan 2014 #1

It doesn't matter what is causing it so don't get sucked into playing that game. randome Jan 2014 #2

It does matter what is causing it! Vattel Jan 2014 #4

Disagree. Reducing fossil fuels is an immediate way to stem the problem. randome Jan 2014 #7

but the only justification for stemming fossil fuels is the fact that they geek tragedy Jan 2014 #10

Oy. Kind of like how treating a disease doesn't require knowing what causes it? geek tragedy Jan 2014 #6

What causes a heart attack? Diet? Weight? Indolence? randome Jan 2014 #8

no, they want to steer us away from the obvious answer: cutting carbon emissions nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #9

The article is not accurate. Vattel Jan 2014 #3

Actually the article is accurate Progressive dog Jan 2014 #5

Um, I pointed out the inaccuracy. The problem is not the research Vattel Jan 2014 #11

Sorry, I misunderstood your point Progressive dog Jan 2014 #13

no problem. cheers. Vattel Jan 2014 #14

Amazing is right. Octafish Jan 2014 #12